IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i2p21582440211022740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pro-Poor Tourism and Local Practices: An Empirical Study of an Autonomous County in China

Author

Listed:
  • Shixian Wen
  • Xiaomei Cai
  • Jun (Justin) Li

Abstract

Pro-poor tourism increases net benefits for the poor or directs profits back into the community by employing local staff and manufacturing. Existing studies have provided a theoretical understanding of how pro-poor tourism can produce environmental, economic, social, and cultural impacts. Little research has been conducted on the power dynamics that are specific to pro-poor tourism, especially in developing countries. This study contributes to pro-poor tourism theory from an operation-level perspective by addressing the alignment and coordination of three stakeholders—local governments, tourism enterprises, and community residents—involved in implementing pro-poor tourism in an ethnic, autonomous county in southern China. The results indicate that in the absence of effective cooperation between the three major stakeholders in strategic tourism development aimed at poverty alleviation, substantially greater benefits will not be delivered to the poor. The findings of this study offer important insights into the roles that stakeholders could play at various stages of sustainable development in the long run. This study can also provide useful information to governments for policy replacements and adjustments.

Suggested Citation

  • Shixian Wen & Xiaomei Cai & Jun (Justin) Li, 2021. "Pro-Poor Tourism and Local Practices: An Empirical Study of an Autonomous County in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:21582440211022740
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211022740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211022740
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211022740?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Papathanassis, Alexis & Knolle, Friederike, 2011. "Exploring the adoption and processing of online holiday reviews: A grounded theory approach," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 215-224.
    2. Christian Rogerson, 2005. "Unpacking tourism SMMEs in South Africa: structure, support needs and policy response," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 623-642.
    3. Lor, Jean Junying & Kwa, Shelly & Donaldson, John A., 2019. "Making ethnic tourism good for the poor," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 140-152.
    4. Liu, Anyu & Wu, Doris Chenguang, 2019. "Tourism productivity and economic growth," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 253-265.
    5. Hiroaki Saito, 2017. "The Role of Intermediaries in Community Capacity Building: Pro-Poor Tourism Perspective," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-3.17.
    6. Rebecca Shah & Richard Batley, 2009. "Private-Sector Investment in Infrastructure: Rationale and Causality for Pro-poor Impacts," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 27(4), pages 397-417, July.
    7. Krzysztof Borodako & Jadwiga Berbeka & Michał Rudnicki, 2015. "Tourism Enterprises as Buyers of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(1), pages 21582440155, January.
    8. Waranpong Boonsiritomachai & Chanchai Phonthanukitithaworn, 2019. "Residents’ Support for Sports Events Tourism Development in Beach City: The Role of Community’s Participation and Tourism Impacts," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    9. Lamers, Machiel & van der Duim, René & van Wijk, Jakomijn & Nthiga, Rita & Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid J., 2014. "Governing conservation tourism partnerships in Kenya," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 250-265.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhaoguo Wang & Fengli Dong, 2022. "Experience of Pro-Poor Tourism (PPT) in China: A Sustainable Livelihood Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Xiaonan Qin & Yue Wang & Lina Liu & Wenhua Yuan & Jianchun Li, 2022. "Research on the Development Potential of China’s Pro-Poor Tourism Industry Based on Geographical Nature Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-24, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer Sin Hung von Zumbusch & Lidija Lalicic, 2020. "The role of co-living spaces in digital nomads’ well-being," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 439-453, September.
    2. Casaló, Luis V. & Flavián, Carlos & Guinalíu, Miguel & Ekinci, Yuksel, 2015. "Avoiding the dark side of positive online consumer reviews: Enhancing reviews' usefulness for high risk-averse travelers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1829-1835.
    3. Rahul Pramani & S. Veena Iyer, 2023. "Adoption of payments banks: a grounded theory approach," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(1), pages 43-57, March.
    4. Nicolau, Juan Luis & Sharma, Abhinav, 2022. "A review of research into drivers of firm value through event studies in tourism and hospitality: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research curated collection on drivers of firm value through event stu," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Oun-Joung Park & Jong-hyun Ryu, 2019. "Cognitive fit effects of online reviews on tourists’ information search," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 313-335, September.
    6. Jennifer Sin Hung von Zumbusch & Lidija Lalicic, 0. "The role of co-living spaces in digital nomads’ well-being," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    7. Larry Dwyer, 2022. "Productivity, Destination Performance, and Stakeholder Well-Being," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Wanjun Xia & Buhari Doğan & Umer Shahzad & Festus Fatai Adedoyin & Abiodun Popoola & Muhammad Adnan Bashir, 2022. "An empirical investigation of tourism-led growth hypothesis in the European countries: evidence from augmented mean group estimator," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 21(2), pages 239-266, May.
    9. Zhaoguo Wang & Fengli Dong, 2022. "Experience of Pro-Poor Tourism (PPT) in China: A Sustainable Livelihood Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Kashmala Latif & Muhammad Yousaf Malik & Abdul Hameed Pitafi & Shamsa Kanwal & Zara Latif, 2020. "If You Travel, I Travel: Testing a Model of When and How Travel-Related Content Exposure on Facebook Triggers the Intention to Visit a Tourist Destination," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    11. Ho, Chaang-Iuan & Lin, Meng-Hui & Chen, Hui-Mei, 2012. "Web users’ behavioural patterns of tourism information search: From online to offline," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1468-1482.
    12. Yoo Ri Kim & Anyu Liu & Allan M Williams, 2022. "Competitiveness in the visitor economy: A systematic literature review," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(3), pages 817-842, May.
    13. Jose Ramon Saura & Ana Reyes-Menendez & Cesar Alvarez-Alonso, 2018. "Do Online Comments Affect Environmental Management? Identifying Factors Related to Environmental Management and Sustainability of Hotels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    14. Xinxin Guo & Juho Pesonen & Raija Komppula, 2021. "Comparing online travel review platforms as destination image information agents," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 159-187, June.
    15. Filieri, Raffaele & Lin, Zhibin & Pino, Giovanni & Alguezaui, Salma & Inversini, Alessandro, 2021. "The role of visual cues in eWOM on consumers’ behavioral intention and decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 663-675.
    16. Ronnie Donaldson & Tina Odinakachi Iirmdu & Musfiqah Majiet & Pauline Van der Spuy, 2023. "Residents and Stakeholder Opinions on Township Tourism in Langa, Cape Town, South Africa," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Salandra, Rossella & Criscuolo, Paola & Salter, Ammon, 2021. "Directing scientists away from potentially biased publications: the role of systematic reviews in health care," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    18. Lifeng He & Dongmei Han & Xiaohang Zhou & Zheng Qu, 2020. "The Voice of Drug Consumers: Online Textual Review Analysis Using Structural Topic Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Ans Kolk & Miguel Rivera-Santos & Carlos Rufín, 2018. "Multinationals, international business, and poverty: A cross-disciplinary research overview and conceptual framework," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(1), pages 92-115, June.
    20. Babajide Abubakr Muritala & Maria-Victoria Sánchez-Rebull & Ana-Beatriz Hernández-Lara, 2020. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Online Reviews Research in Tourism and Hospitality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:21582440211022740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.