IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v237y2023i3p524-545.html

System-level failure prognostics: Literature review and main challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Ferhat Tamssaouet
  • Khanh TP Nguyen
  • Kamal Medjaher
  • Marcos Eduardo Orchard

Abstract

This paper reviews methods and practices for addressing the concepts of system-level prognostics (SLP) and system remaining useful life (SRUL) estimation applied to multicomponent systems. A precise definition of SLP is provided, emphasizing the advantages of its use in terms of identifying the scope of SLP applications. In addition, a comprehensive review of the literature is provided to properly classify and compare the findings of previously published studies in the field of SLP and evaluate the effectiveness of the available methodologies within the different stages of prognostic development. Finally, and considering that SLP is still a relatively recent research field, we also provide a thorough discussion on the main challenges that remain to be solved before achieving complete technology transfer, as well as future research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferhat Tamssaouet & Khanh TP Nguyen & Kamal Medjaher & Marcos Eduardo Orchard, 2023. "System-level failure prognostics: Literature review and main challenges," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(3), pages 524-545, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:237:y:2023:i:3:p:524-545
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X221118448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X221118448
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X221118448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nguyen, Khanh T.P. & Medjaher, Kamal, 2019. "A new dynamic predictive maintenance framework using deep learning for failure prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 251-262.
    2. F. Tamssaouet & S. Amari, 2018. "Modelling and temporal evaluation of networked control systems using timed automata with guards and (max,+) algebra," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(10), pages 2073-2088, July.
    3. John J. McCall, 1965. "Maintenance Policies for Stochastically Failing Equipment: A Survey," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(5), pages 493-524, March.
    4. Khorasgani, Hamed & Biswas, Gautam & Sankararaman, Shankar, 2016. "Methodologies for system-level remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 8-18.
    5. Wenshuo Tang & Darius Roman & Ross Dickie & Valentin Robu & David Flynn, 2020. "Prognostics and Health Management for the Optimization of Marine Hybrid Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    6. Linkan Bian & Nagi Gebraeel, 2014. "Stochastic framework for partially degradation systems with continuous component degradation‐rate‐interactions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(4), pages 286-303, June.
    7. Shafiee, Mahmood & Finkelstein, Maxim & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2015. "An opportunistic condition-based maintenance policy for offshore wind turbine blades subjected to degradation and environmental shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 463-471.
    8. Olde Keizer, Minou C.A. & Flapper, Simme Douwe P. & Teunter, Ruud H., 2017. "Condition-based maintenance policies for systems with multiple dependent components: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 405-420.
    9. Qianhui Wu & Keqin Ding & Biqing Huang, 2020. "Approach for fault prognosis using recurrent neural network," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(7), pages 1621-1633, October.
    10. Niu, Gang & Jiang, Junjie, 2017. "Prognostic control-enhanced maintenance optimization for multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 218-226.
    11. Mengyao Gu & Youling Chen, 2019. "Two improvements of similarity-based residual life prediction methods," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 303-315, January.
    12. Cho, Danny I. & Parlar, Mahmut, 1991. "A survey of maintenance models for multi-unit systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 1-23, March.
    13. Nguyen, T.P. Khanh & Yeung, Thomas G. & Castanier, Bruno, 2013. "Optimal maintenance and replacement decisions under technological change with consideration of spare parts inventories," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 472-477.
    14. Rommert Dekker & Ralph Wildeman & Frank Duyn Schouten, 1997. "A review of multi-component maintenance models with economic dependence," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 45(3), pages 411-435, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    2. Liu, Xinbao & Yang, Tianji & Pei, Jun & Liao, Haitao & Pohl, Edward A., 2019. "Replacement and inventory control for a multi-customer product service system with decreasing replacement costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 561-574.
    3. Olde Keizer, Minou C.A. & Flapper, Simme Douwe P. & Teunter, Ruud H., 2017. "Condition-based maintenance policies for systems with multiple dependent components: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 405-420.
    4. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    5. Petchrompo, Sanyapong & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2019. "A review of asset management literature on multi-asset systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 181-201.
    6. Berrade, M.D. & Scarf, P.A. & Cavalcante, C.A.V., 2018. "Conditional inspection and maintenance of a system with two interacting components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 533-544.
    7. Jaturonnatee, J. & Murthy, D.N.P. & Boondiskulchok, R., 2006. "Optimal preventive maintenance of leased equipment with corrective minimal repairs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 201-215, October.
    8. Jiawen Hu & Zuhua Jiang & Haitao Liao, 2017. "Preventive maintenance of a batch production system under time-varying operational condition," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(19), pages 5681-5705, October.
    9. Zhang, Xiaohong & Zeng, Jianchao, 2017. "Joint optimization of condition-based opportunistic maintenance and spare parts provisioning policy in multiunit systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 479-498.
    10. Olde Keizer, Minou C.A. & Teunter, Ruud H. & Veldman, Jasper, 2016. "Clustering condition-based maintenance for systems with redundancy and economic dependencies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 531-540.
    11. Petchrompo, Sanyapong & Li, Hao & Erguido, Asier & Riches, Chris & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2020. "A value-based approach to optimizing long-term maintenance plans for a multi-asset k-out-of-N system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    12. Retsef Levi & Thomas Magnanti & Yaron Shaposhnik, 2019. "Scheduling with Testing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 776-793, February.
    13. Aghezzaf, El-Houssaine & Khatab, Abdelhakim & Tam, Phuoc Le, 2016. "Optimizing production and imperfect preventive maintenance planning׳s integration in failure-prone manufacturing systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 190-198.
    14. Abu MD Ariful Islam & Jørn Vatn, 2023. "Condition-based multi-component maintenance decision support under degradation uncertainties," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(4), pages 961-979, December.
    15. Shahraki, Ameneh Forouzandeh & Yadav, Om Prakash & Vogiatzis, Chrysafis, 2020. "Selective maintenance optimization for multi-state systems considering stochastically dependent components and stochastic imperfect maintenance actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    16. Wang, Yukun & Li, Xiaopeng & Chen, Junyan & Liu, Yiliu, 2022. "A condition-based maintenance policy for multi-component systems subject to stochastic and economic dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    17. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    18. Urbani, Michele & Brunelli, Matteo & Punkka, Antti, 2023. "An approach for bi-objective maintenance scheduling on a networked system with limited resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 101-113.
    19. Hu, Jiawen & Shen, Jingyuan & Shen, Lijuan, 2020. "Opportunistic maintenance for two-component series systems subject to dependent degradation and shock," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    20. Wang, Jingjing & Qiu, Qingan & Wang, Huanhuan, 2021. "Joint optimization of condition-based and age-based replacement policy and inventory policy for a two-unit series system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:237:y:2023:i:3:p:524-545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.