IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v236y2022i2p357-370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk-informed reliability improvement optimization for verification and validation planning based on set covering modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Gongyu Wu
  • Zhaojun (Steven) Li
  • Pan Liu

Abstract

Verification and validation plays a crucial role in the new product development process since it is able to assure product performance and eventually determine customer satisfaction. The verification and validation planning assigns a set of verification and validation activities such as computational simulations and physical tests, which are proposed to mitigate the design risks of specific failure modes, to verify and validate that the product conforms to the design objectives. This article formulates the optimal verification and validation planning using set covering, set partition, and set packing concepts. An extended optimization model based on set covering is also formulated, which can well accommodate the requirements including minimizing the overall risk of the product design, meeting pre-specified risk thresholds of specific failure modes, and covering identified critical failure modes. Additional constraints such as the implementation sequences, time gaps of various types of verification and validation activities, and the distinct effectiveness of each verification and validation activity in reducing design risks are considered in the verification and validation planning optimization models. The decay of the improvement effectiveness of a failure mode with multiple verification and validation activities over time is also considered. The application of the proposed mathematical optimization models for product verification and validation planning is illustrated through the product development of a power generation system within a diesel engine.

Suggested Citation

  • Gongyu Wu & Zhaojun (Steven) Li & Pan Liu, 2022. "Risk-informed reliability improvement optimization for verification and validation planning based on set covering modeling," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(2), pages 357-370, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:2:p:357-370
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X19898294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X19898294
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X19898294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan & Yunfeng, Jiang, 2009. "Incorporating cost and environmental factors in quality function deployment using data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 711-723, June.
    2. Gupta, Abhishek & Pawar, Kulwant S. & Smart, Palie, 2007. "New product development in the pharmaceutical and telecommunication industries: A comparative study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 41-60, March.
    3. Gabriela Estrada & Dan L. Shunk & Feng Ju, 2018. "Systematic continuous improvement model for variation management of key characteristics running with low capability," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(6), pages 2370-2387, March.
    4. Tyson R. Browning, 2009. "The many views of a process: Toward a process architecture framework for product development processes," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 69-90, March.
    5. Mobin, Mohammadsadegh & Li, Zhaojun & Cheraghi, S. Hossein & Wu, Gongyu, 2019. "An approach for design Verification and Validation planning and optimization for new product reliability improvement," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Murthy, D.N.P. & Rausand, M. & Virtanen, S., 2009. "Investment in new product reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1593-1600.
    7. Ahmed, Hussam & Chateauneuf, Alaa, 2014. "Optimal number of tests to achieve and validate product reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 242-250.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lirong Cui & David W Coit, 2022. "Guest Editorial: SMRLO-2019 Special Issue," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(2), pages 223-224, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mobin, Mohammadsadegh & Li, Zhaojun & Cheraghi, S. Hossein & Wu, Gongyu, 2019. "An approach for design Verification and Validation planning and optimization for new product reliability improvement," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Li, Yan-Lai & Tang, Jia-Fu & Chin, Kwai-Sang & Jiang, Yu-Shi & Han, Yi & Pu, Yun, 2011. "Estimating the final priority ratings of engineering characteristics in mature-period product improvement by MDBA and AHP," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 575-586, June.
    3. Khalil, Y.F., 2019. "New statistical formulations for determination of qualification test plans of safety instrumented systems (SIS) subject to low/high operational demands," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 196-209.
    4. Samoilenko, Sergey & Osei-Bryson, Kweku-Muata, 2013. "Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for monitoring efficiency-based performance of productivity-driven organizations: Design and implementation of a decision support system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 131-142.
    5. Lai, Kee-hung & Wong, Christina W.Y., 2012. "Green logistics management and performance: Some empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing exporters," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 267-282.
    6. Xu, Jiuping & Li, Zongmin, 2012. "A review on Ecological Engineering based Engineering Management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 368-378.
    7. Rufo, M.J. & Martín, J. & Pérez, C.J., 2016. "A Bayesian negotiation model for quality and price in a multi-consumer context," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 132-141.
    8. Liu, John S. & Lu, Wen-Min, 2010. "DEA and ranking with the network-based approach: a case of R&D performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 453-464, December.
    9. Kim Davis & Thomas Mazzuchi & Shahram Sarkani, 2013. "Architecting technology transitions: A sustainability‐oriented sociotechnical approach," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 193-212, June.
    10. Pedroso, Marcelo Caldeira & Nakano, Davi, 2009. "Knowledge and information flows in supply chains: A study on pharmaceutical companies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 376-384, November.
    11. Chowdhury, Md. Maruf Hossan & Quaddus, Mohammed A., 2015. "A multiple objective optimization based QFD approach for efficient resilient strategies to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities: The case of garment industry of Bangladesh☆,☆☆☆This manuscript was pro," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 5-21.
    12. Lo Nigro, Giovanna & Morreale, Azzurra & Enea, Gianluca, 2014. "Open innovation: A real option to restore value to the biopharmaceutical R&D," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 183-193.
    13. Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan & Ramanathan, Usha, 2010. "A qualitative perspective to deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 228-232, June.
    14. Azadi, Majid & Farzipoor Saen, Reza, 2013. "A combination of QFD and imprecise DEA with enhanced Russell graph measure: A case study in healthcare," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 281-291.
    15. Jeffery L. Williams & Jerrell T. Stracener, 2013. "First steps in the development of a Program Organizational Architectural Framework (POAF)," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 45-70, March.
    16. Wang, Xin & Xie, Wei & Ye, Zhi-Sheng & Tang, Loon-Ching, 2017. "Aggregate discounted warranty cost forecasting considering the failed-but-not-reported events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 355-364.
    17. Yan, Tingting & Wagner, Stephan M., 2017. "Do what and with whom? Value creation and appropriation in inter-organizational new product development projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 1-14.
    18. Nafissa Jibet & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil & Blandine Chazelle & Dominique Laousse, 2023. "Renovating engineering departements' creation heritage to meet contemporary challenges: frugal validation patterns and constructive proof logics for new engineering rules," Post-Print hal-04074841, HAL.
    19. Pai Zheng & Xun Xu & Sheng Quan Xie, 2019. "A weighted interval rough number based method to determine relative importance ratings of customer requirements in QFD product planning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 3-16, January.
    20. Jianing Wu & Shaoze Yan, 2014. "An approach to system reliability prediction for mechanical equipment using fuzzy reasoning Petri net," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(1), pages 39-51, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:236:y:2022:i:2:p:357-370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.