IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v227y2013i4p411-424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bayesian network to evaluate underground rails maintenance strategies in an automation context

Author

Listed:
  • Laurent Bouillaut
  • Olivier Francois
  • Stéphane Dubois

Abstract

Reliability analysis has become an integral part of system design and operation. This is especially true for systems performing critical tasks, such as mass transportation systems. This explains the numerous advances in the field of reliability modeling. More recently, some studies involving the use of Bayesian networks have been proven relevant to represent complex systems and perform reliability studies. In previous works, a generic methodology was introduced for developing a decision support tool to evaluate complex systems maintenance strategies. This article deals with development of such a decision tool dedicated to the maintenance of Paris metro rails. Indeed, owing to fulfillment of high-performance levels of safety and availability (the latter being especially critical at peak hours), operators need to estimate, hour by hour their ability to prevent or to detect broken rails. To address this problem, a decision support tool was developed, the aim of this article is to evaluate, compare and optimize various operating and maintenance strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurent Bouillaut & Olivier Francois & Stéphane Dubois, 2013. "A Bayesian network to evaluate underground rails maintenance strategies in an automation context," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(4), pages 411-424, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:227:y:2013:i:4:p:411-424
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X13481306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X13481306
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X13481306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Langseth, Helge & Portinale, Luigi, 2007. "Bayesian networks in reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 92-108.
    2. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Medina-Oliva, G. & Weber, P. & Iung, B., 2013. "PRM-based patterns for knowledge formalisation of industrial systems to support maintenance strategies assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 38-56.
    2. Song, Kai & Shi, Jian & Yi, Xiaojian, 2020. "A time-discrete and zero-adjusted gamma process model with application to degradation analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    3. Thomas Michael Welte & Iver Bakken Sperstad & Espen Høegh Sørum & Magne Lorentzen Kolstad, 2017. "Integration of Degradation Processes in a Strategic Offshore Wind Farm O&M Simulation Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    5. Pan, Yue & Ou, Shenwei & Zhang, Limao & Zhang, Wenjing & Wu, Xianguo & Li, Heng, 2019. "Modeling risks in dependent systems: A Copula-Bayesian approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 416-431.
    6. Phuc Do & Christophe Bérenguer, 2022. "Residual life-based importance measures for predictive maintenance decision-making," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 98-113, February.
    7. Wang, Xiaolin & Liu, Bin & Zhao, Xiujie, 2021. "A performance-based warranty for products subject to competing hard and soft failures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    8. Nicolai, R.P. & Frenk, J.B.G. & Dekker, R., 2007. "Modelling and Optimizing Imperfect Maintenance of Coatings on Steel Structures," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-043-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    9. Lin Wang & Zhiqiang Lu & Yifei Ren, 2019. "A rolling horizon approach for production planning and condition-based maintenance under uncertain demand," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(6), pages 1014-1028, December.
    10. Liang, Qingzhu & Yang, Yinghao & Peng, Changhong, 2023. "A reliability model for systems subject to mutually dependent degradation processes and random shocks under dynamic environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    11. Shen, Jingyuan & Cui, Lirong & Ma, Yizhong, 2019. "Availability and optimal maintenance policy for systems degrading in dynamic environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 133-143.
    12. Rogerson, Ellen C. & Lambert, James H., 2012. "Prioritizing risks via several expert perspectives with application to runway safety," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 22-34.
    13. Maxim Finkelstein & Ji Hwan Cha, 2022. "Reducing degradation and age of items in imperfect repair modeling," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(4), pages 1058-1081, December.
    14. Lu, Biao & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2017. "Opportunistic preventive maintenance scheduling for serial-parallel multistage manufacturing systems with multiple streams of deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 116-127.
    15. Xudan Chen & Guoxun Ji & Xinli Sun & Zhen Li, 2019. "Inverse Gaussian–based model with measurement errors for degradation analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(6), pages 1086-1098, December.
    16. Liu, Xingheng & Matias, José & Jäschke, Johannes & Vatn, Jørn, 2022. "Gibbs sampler for noisy Transformed Gamma process: Inference and remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    17. Giorgio, Massimiliano & Pulcini, Gianpaolo, 2018. "A new state-dependent degradation process and related model misidentification problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 1027-1038.
    18. Ibsen Chivatá Cárdenas & Saad S.H. Al‐Jibouri & Johannes I.M. Halman & Frits A. van Tol, 2014. "Modeling Risk‐Related Knowledge in Tunneling Projects," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 323-339, February.
    19. Marquez, David & Neil, Martin & Fenton, Norman, 2010. "Improved reliability modeling using Bayesian networks and dynamic discretization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 412-425.
    20. George-Williams, Hindolo & Patelli, Edoardo, 2017. "Efficient availability assessment of reconfigurable multi-state systems with interdependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 431-444.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:227:y:2013:i:4:p:411-424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.