IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v20y2008i3p343-365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Emotional Dynamics: Currency Versus Field

Author

Listed:
  • David L. Sallach

    (Center for Complex Adaptive Agent Systems Simulation, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Building 900, Argonne, IL 60439-4832, 630-252-5760, Computation Institute, University of Chicago, sallach@anl.gov)

Abstract

Randall Collins has introduced a simplified model of emotional dynamics in which emotional energy, heightened and focused by interaction rituals, serves as a common denominator for social exchange: a generic form of currency, except that it is active in a far broader range of social transactions. While the scope of this theory is attractive, the specifics of the model remain unconvincing. After a critical assessment of the currency theory of emotion, a field model of emotion is introduced that adds expressiveness by locating emotional valence within its cognitive context, thereby creating an integrated orientation field. The result is a model which claims less in the way of motivational specificity, but is more satisfactory in modeling the dynamic interaction between cognitive and emotional orientations at both individual and social levels.

Suggested Citation

  • David L. Sallach, 2008. "Modeling Emotional Dynamics: Currency Versus Field," Rationality and Society, , vol. 20(3), pages 343-365, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:20:y:2008:i:3:p:343-365
    DOI: 10.1177/1043463108092532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463108092532
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1043463108092532?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sniderman, Paul M. & Hagen, Michael G. & Tetlock, Philip E. & Brady, Henry E., 1986. "Reasoning Chains: Causal Models of Policy Reasoning in Mass Publics," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 405-430, October.
    2. Randall Collins, 1993. "Emotional Energy as the Common Denominator of Rational Action," Rationality and Society, , vol. 5(2), pages 203-230, April.
    3. Brady, Henry E. & Sniderman, Paul M., 1985. "Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 79(4), pages 1061-1078, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Boyns & Sarah Luery, 2015. "Negative Emotional Energy: A Theory of the “Dark-Side” of Interaction Ritual Chains," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Achim Schlüter & Insa Theesfeld, 2010. "The grammar of institutions: The challenge of distinguishing between strategies, norms, and rules," Rationality and Society, , vol. 22(4), pages 445-475, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Buckley, Peter J. & Cross, Adam & De Mattos, Claudio, 2015. "The principle of congruity in the analysis of international business cooperation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 1048-1060.
    2. Paul Froese & F. Carson Mencken, 2009. "A U.S. Holy War? The Effects of Religion on Iraq War Policy Attitudes," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 90(1), pages 103-116, March.
    3. Paul Marx, 2019. "Should we study political behaviour as rituals? Towards a general micro theory of politics in everyday life," Rationality and Society, , vol. 31(3), pages 313-336, August.
    4. Achim Schlüter & Insa Theesfeld, 2010. "The grammar of institutions: The challenge of distinguishing between strategies, norms, and rules," Rationality and Society, , vol. 22(4), pages 445-475, November.
    5. Kevin Arceneaux & Robin Kolodny, 2009. "Educating the Least Informed: Group Endorsements in a Grassroots Campaign," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(4), pages 755-770, October.
    6. Julio Rotemberg, 2009. "Attitude-dependent altruism, turnout and voting," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 223-244, July.
    7. Joo, Dongoh & Tasci, Asli D.A. & Woosnam, Kyle M. & Maruyama, Naho U. & Hollas, Chadley R. & Aleshinloye, Kayode D., 2018. "Residents' attitude towards domestic tourists explained by contact, emotional solidarity and social distance," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 245-257.
    8. Wallis, Joe, 2006. "Evaluating economic theories of NPOs: A survey, a case study and some new directions for socio-economics," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 959-979, December.
    9. Lihi Lahat & Gila Menahem, 2009. "Causes and Remedies for Poverty: Perceptions among Local Elected Leaders in Israel," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), pages 1-31, July.
    10. Arthur Lupia & Adam S. Levine & Jesse O. Menning & Gisela Sin, 2005. "Were Bush Tax Cut Supporters “Simply Ignorant?” A Second Look at Conservatives and Liberals in “Homer Gets a Tax Cut”," Public Economics 0510004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Creed Tumlison & Rachael M. Moyer & Geoboo Song, 2017. "The Origin and Role of Trust in Local Policy Elites’ Perceptions of High‐Voltage Power Line Installations in the State of Arkansas," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(5), pages 1018-1036, May.
    12. Tiziana Casciaro & Miguel Sousa Lobo, 2015. "Affective Primacy in Intraorganizational Task Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 373-389, April.
    13. James Adams & Simon Weschle & Christopher Wlezien, 2021. "Elite Interactions and Voters’ Perceptions of Parties’ Policy Positions," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(1), pages 101-114, January.
    14. repec:esm:wpaper:esmt-13-02 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Zachary Elkins & Beth Simmons, 2005. "On Waves, Clusters, and Diffusion: A Conceptual Framework," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 598(1), pages 33-51, March.
    16. Wallis, Joe, 1999. "Understanding the role of leadership in economic policy reform," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 39-53, January.
    17. Damon M. Centola, 2013. "Homophily, networks, and critical mass: Solving the start-up problem in large group collective action," Rationality and Society, , vol. 25(1), pages 3-40, February.
    18. Beckert, Jens, 1999. "Economic Action and Embeddedness: The Problem of the Structure of Action," Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics, Working Paper Series qt6jc6f1q6, Center for Culture, Organizations and Politics of theInstitute for Research on Labor and Employment, UC Berkeley.
    19. Kayla S. Canelo, 2022. "Citations to Interest Groups and Acceptance of Supreme Court Decisions," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 189-222, March.
    20. Larry M. Bartels, 2016. "Failure to Converge," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 667(1), pages 143-165, September.
    21. Eric S. Dickson & Kenneth Scheve, 2006. "Social Identity, Political Speech, and Electoral Competition," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 18(1), pages 5-39, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:20:y:2008:i:3:p:343-365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.