IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jouent/v34y2025i3p491-521.html

Autobiographical Narratives of Entrepreneurship: Happy, Curious and Out to Make a Difference

Author

Listed:
  • Tyler F. Stillman

Abstract

There is a lively debate among scholars about the definition and dimensions of entrepreneurship. However, the public understanding often differs from that of academics. This investigation explores how ordinary individuals conceptualise entrepreneurship through the lens of their own experiences. In particular, this study obtained autobiographical narratives about both entrepreneurship and risk, and subjected those accounts to impartial analysis using language analysis software. Study 1 ( N = 51) used a within-subjects design, and Study 2 ( N = 130) used a between-subjects design. Across both methodologies, entrepreneurial experiences were marked not only by agentic action and a desire to benefit others but also by a notably positive tone and a sense of curiosity.

Suggested Citation

  • Tyler F. Stillman, 2025. "Autobiographical Narratives of Entrepreneurship: Happy, Curious and Out to Make a Difference," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 34(3), pages 491-521, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jouent:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:491-521
    DOI: 10.1177/09713557251369922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09713557251369922
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09713557251369922?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carter, Nancy M. & Gartner, William B. & Shaver, Kelly G. & Gatewood, Elizabeth J., 2003. "The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 13-39, January.
    2. Helene Ahl, 2006. "Why Research on Women Entrepreneurs Needs New Directions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(5), pages 595-621, September.
    3. James Waters & Nicos Nicolaou & Dimosthenis Stefanidis & Hariton Efstathiades & George Pallis & Marios Dikaiakos, 2021. "Exploring the sentiment of entrepreneurs on Twitter," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-25, July.
    4. Ramoglou, Stratos & Gartner, William B. & Tsang, Eric W.K., 2020. "“Who is an entrepreneur?” is (still) the wrong question," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 13(C).
    5. Hunt, Richard A. & Townsend, David M. & Lerner, Daniel A. & Brownell, Katrina M., 2024. "Pivot, persist or perish? Knowledge problems and the extraordinarily tight boundary conditions of entrepreneurs as scientists," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    6. Cooper, Arnold C. & Woo, Carolyn Y. & Dunkelberg, William C., 1988. "Entrepreneurs' perceived chances for success," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 97-108.
    7. Friederike Welter, 2011. "Contextualizing Entrepreneurship—Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 165-184, January.
    8. Lundmark, Erik & Milanov, Hana & Seigner, Benedikt David Christian, 2022. "Can it be measured? A quantitative assessment of critiques of the entrepreneurship literature," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    9. Alisa Jno-Charles & Raja Singaram & Miruna Radu-Lefebvre & William B. Gartner, 2025. "Determining when a new venture is legitimate: A changepoint analysis of social media rhetoric," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(6), pages 2507-2543, November.
    10. Marco Caliendo & Frank Fossen & Alexander Kritikos, 2009. "Risk attitudes of nascent entrepreneurs–new evidence from an experimentally validated survey," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 153-167, February.
    11. Alisa Jno-Charles & Raja Singaram & Miruna Radu-Lefebvre & William Gartner, 2025. "Determining when a new venture is legitimate: a changepoint analysis of social media rhetoric," Post-Print hal-05369326, HAL.
    12. Raymond K. Van Ness & Charles F. Seifert & Janet H. Marler & William J. Wales & Mark E. Hughes, 2020. "Proactive Entrepreneurs: Who Are They and How Are They Different?," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 29(1), pages 148-175, March.
    13. Dimo Dimov, 2011. "Grappling with the Unbearable Elusiveness of Entrepreneurial Opportunities," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 57-81, January.
    14. Staniewski, Marcin W. & Awruk, Katarzyna & Leonardi, Giuseppe & Słomski, Wojciech, 2024. "Family determinants of entrepreneurial success - The mediational role of self-esteem and achievement motivation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    15. Dimov, Dimo, 2024. "The future in the mirror and behind it: Scientists and more," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    16. Davidsson, Per, 2015. "Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 674-695.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erik Lundmark & Anna Krzeminska & Dean A. Shepherd, 2019. "Images of Entrepreneurship: Exploring Root Metaphors and Expanding Upon Them," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(1), pages 138-170, January.
    2. Virginie Vial & Katia Richomme Huet, 2017. "Women entrepreneurs in France," Post-Print hal-03628415, HAL.
    3. Mark D. Packard & Per L. Bylund, 2025. "Truth, knowledge, and entrepreneurship theory: arguments for a rationalist scientific epistemology," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 381-405, June.
    4. Michael Fritsch & Alina Rusakova, 2010. "Personality Traits, Self-Employment, and Professions," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 343, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    5. Alfredo De Massis & Josip Kotlar & Mike Wright & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2018. "Sector-Based Entrepreneurial Capabilities and the Promise of Sector Studies in Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(1), pages 3-23, January.
    6. Franczak, Jennifer & Lanivich, Stephen E. & Adomako, Samuel, 2023. "Filling institutional voids: Combinative effects of institutional shortcomings and gender on the alertness – Opportunity recognition relationship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    7. Francisco Liñán & Inmaculada Jaén & Domingo Martín, 2022. "Does entrepreneurship fit her? Women entrepreneurs, gender-role orientation, and entrepreneurial culture," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1051-1071, February.
    8. Davidsson, Per, 2022. "McBride and Wuebker's Socially Objective Opportunities: Do they move the field forward?," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    9. Gina Santos & Carla Susana Marques & João Ferreira, 2021. "The Influence of Embeddedness on Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Strategy: A Gender Perspective in the Agri-Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-29, August.
    10. Frederik von Briel & Per Davidsson & Jan Recker, 2018. "Digital Technologies as External Enablers of New Venture Creation in the IT Hardware Sector," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(1), pages 47-69, January.
    11. Schade, Philipp & Schuhmacher, Monika C., 2022. "Digital infrastructure and entrepreneurial action-formation: A multilevel study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(5).
    12. Mark D. Packard & Farsan Madjdi, 2026. "Seeing Expectations as “Opportunities†: Interpretive Philosophy and the Origins of “Opportunity†Perceptions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 50(3), pages 830-861, May.
    13. Weking, Jörg & Desouza, Kevin C. & Fielt, Erwin & Kowalkiewicz, Marek, 2023. "Metaverse-enabled entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    14. Justo, Rachida & DeTienne, Dawn R. & Sieger, Philipp, 2015. "Failure or voluntary exit? Reassessing the female underperformance hypothesis," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 775-792.
    15. Heiko Bergmann, 2017. "The formation of opportunity beliefs among university entrepreneurs: an empirical study of research- and non-research-driven venture ideas," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 116-140, February.
    16. Sergeeva, Anastasia & Bhardwaj, Akhil & Dimov, Dimo, 2021. "In the heat of the game: Analogical abduction in a pragmatist account of entrepreneurial reasoning," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(6).
    17. Christopher J. Boudreaux & Daniel L. Bennett & David S. Lucas & Boris N. Nikolaev, 2023. "Taking mental models seriously: institutions, entrepreneurship, and the mediating role of socio-cognitive traits," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 465-493, August.
    18. Jolien Roelandt & Petra Andries & Mirjam Knockaert, 2022. "The contribution of board experience to opportunity development in high-tech ventures," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 1627-1645, March.
    19. Martin Mabunda Baluku & Florence Nansubuga & Kathleen Otto & Lisa Horn, 2021. "Risk Aversion, Entrepreneurial Attitudes, Intention and Entry Among Young People in Uganda and Germany: A Gendered Analysis," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 7(1), pages 31-59, January.
    20. Francesca Picciaia, 2020. "Italian Female Social Entrepreneurship and Management: An Explorative Study on Social Cooperatives," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(2), pages 56-68, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jouent:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:491-521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ediindia.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.