IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jospec/v17y2016i2p159-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Intensity of Sports Rivalries Using Data From Secondary Market Transactions

Author

Listed:
  • Ken Sanford
  • Frank Scott

Abstract

Assessing the intensity of college football rivalries is an annual exercise of sports columnists. Fan polling, average ticket price, and even the bad behaviors of athletes have been used to quantify and rank rivalries. For economists, market prices of tickets have an appealing behavioral interpretation as they represent fans’ marginal willingness to substitute game attendance for other sources of utility. We have collected secondary market data on 278,117 individual ticket sales at different points in the season for 171 home games played by Southeastern Conference (SEC) member football teams over a 2-year period. Our rich data set allows us to control for the quality of the seats and the effects of on-field successes or failures during the season. Since we use data from 2 successive years, we are also able to normalize the level effect on prices of certain stadiums. We construct a willingness-to-pay measure of fan interest in various matchups and use this to compare the intensity of different rivalries for SEC schools.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken Sanford & Frank Scott, 2016. "Assessing the Intensity of Sports Rivalries Using Data From Secondary Market Transactions," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 17(2), pages 159-174, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jospec:v:17:y:2016:i:2:p:159-174
    DOI: 10.1177/1527002514527112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1527002514527112
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1527002514527112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Holmes, 2011. "Win or Go Home: Why College Football Coaches Get Fired," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 12(2), pages 157-178, April.
    2. Wayne DeSarbo & Robert Madrigal, 2012. "Exploring the Demand Aspects of Sports Consumption and Fan Avidity," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 199-212, April.
    3. repec:wly:soecon:v:81:1:y:2014:p:23-55 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Mark D. Groza, 2010. "NCAA conference realignment and football game day attendance," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(8), pages 517-529, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sung, Hojun & Mills, Brian M. & Tainsky, Scott, 2017. "From schadenfreude to mitfreude? Estimating viewership loss and rivalrous relationships in otherwise neutral markets," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 159-169.
    2. Cody T. Havard & Frederick G. Grieve & Megan E. Lomenick, 2020. "Marvel, DC, and Sport: Investigating Rivalry in the Sport and Comic Settings," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(3), pages 1075-1089, May.
    3. Craig A. Depken & Adam J. Hoffer & Abdul H. Kidwai, 2022. "An artefactual field experiment of group discrimination between sports fans," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 411-432, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gregory A. Falls & Paul A. Natke & Linlan Xiao, 2022. "College football attendance in the long run: The Football Championship Subdivision," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2172-2183, September.
    2. Daniel C. Hickman & Andrew G. Meyer, 2017. "Does Athletic Success Influence Persistence At Higher Education Institutions? New Evidence Using Panel Data," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 35(4), pages 658-676, October.
    3. Jason A. Winfree, 2020. "Rivalries, Bowl Eligibility, and Scheduling Effects in College Football," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 21(5), pages 477-492, June.
    4. Jeremy J. Foreman & Brian P. Soebbing & Chad S. Seifried, 2019. "The impact of deviance on head coach dismissals and implications of a personal conduct policy," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 491-501, October.
    5. Michael A. Roach, 2022. "Career concerns and personnel investment in the Major League Baseball player draft," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(1), pages 413-426, January.
    6. Stefan Szymanski & Jason Winfree, 2018. "On The Optimal Realignment Of A Contest: The Case Of College Football," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(1), pages 483-496, January.
    7. Xin Meng & Zilin Tang & Leonard F. S. Wang, 2023. "Sport tickets pricing strategy with home team's crowd effect," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 839-847, March.
    8. Michael J. Fry & Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, 2012. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Analytics in Sports, Part I: General Sports Applications," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 105-108, April.
    9. Deepak Srivastav & Puram Praveen & Rudra Sensarma & Anand Gurumurthy, 2021. "Does salary dispersion affect team performance in cricket? Evidence from the Indian Premier League," Working papers 441, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    10. Paul A. Natke & Elizabeth A. Thomas, 2019. "Does a marching band impact college Football game attendance? A panel study of Division II," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(16), pages 1354-1357, September.
    11. Ira Horowitz, 2017. "An Efficiency Evaluation of Men’s College Basketball Coaches," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 62(1), pages 77-98, March.
    12. Yvon Rocaboy & Marek Pavlik, 2020. "Performance Expectations of Professional Sport Teams and In-Season Head Coach Dismissals—Evidence from the English and French Men’s Football First Divisions," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Kurt W. Rotthoff & Kaylyn R. Sanbower, 2016. "Professional ‘amateurs’ in the NCAA: the impact of downstream demand," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 373-376, March.
    14. McDonald P. Mirabile, 2015. "The Determinants of Attendance at Neutral Site College Football Games," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 191-204, April.
    15. Salaga, Steven & Juravich, Matthew, 2020. "National Football League head coach race, performance, retention, and dismissal," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 978-991.
    16. Jensen Jonathan A. & Turner Brian A., 2014. "What if statisticians ran college football? A re-conceptualization of the football bowl subdivision," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 37-48, January.
    17. Wangrow, David B. & Schepker, Donald J. & Barker, Vincent L., 2018. "Power, performance, and expectations in the dismissal of NBA coaches: A survival analysis study," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 333-346.
    18. Nicholas M. Watanabe & Grace Yan & Brian P. Soebbing, 2019. "Market disruption as a regime for athlete activism: An economic analysis of college football player protests," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 600-612, December.
    19. Lefgren, Lars J. & Platt, Brennan & Price, Joseph & Higbee, Samuel, 2019. "Outcome based accountability: Theory and evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 121-137.
    20. Gilfix Zach & Meyerson James & Addona Vittorio, 2020. "Longevity differences in the tenures of American and foreign Major League Soccer managers," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 17-26, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jospec:v:17:y:2016:i:2:p:159-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.