IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v22y2015i15p1209-1223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of conference realignment on NCAA athletic departments

Author

Listed:
  • Adam J. Hoffer
  • Jared A. Pincin

Abstract

This study uses a panel of National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletic department revenue and expenditure data from 227 public colleges and universities to empirically investigate the effects of conference realignment over the period 2006-2011. The results show that schools moving into automatic-qualifying conferences experienced nearly $12.15 million in increased revenue, nearly matched by $10.12 million in added expenditures. Schools moving into any FBS conference saw revenues increase by $6.43 million, with expenses growing $5.03 million. Schools switching conferences to a non-FBS conference did not see a statistically significant change in revenues or expenses. Schools with football programs saw revenues increase by $2.94 million and profits increase by close to $1 million. Despite the increase in revenues, no change to institutional subsidies was observed.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam J. Hoffer & Jared A. Pincin, 2015. "The effects of conference realignment on NCAA athletic departments," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(15), pages 1209-1223, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:22:y:2015:i:15:p:1209-1223
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2015.1021448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2015.1021448
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2015.1021448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark D. Groza, 2010. "NCAA conference realignment and football game day attendance," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(8), pages 517-529, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caro Cary A., 2018. "The Impact of Competitive Markets on Recruiting: Lessons from Collegiate Athletics," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 79(1), pages 25-35, June.
    2. Craig A. Depken & Adam J. Hoffer & Abdul H. Kidwai, 2022. "An artefactual field experiment of group discrimination between sports fans," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 411-432, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel C. Hickman & Andrew G. Meyer, 2017. "Does Athletic Success Influence Persistence At Higher Education Institutions? New Evidence Using Panel Data," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 35(4), pages 658-676, October.
    2. Jason A. Winfree, 2020. "Rivalries, Bowl Eligibility, and Scheduling Effects in College Football," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 21(5), pages 477-492, June.
    3. Gregory A. Falls & Paul A. Natke, 2016. "College Football Attendance: A Panel Study of the Football Championship Subdivision," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(8), pages 530-540, December.
    4. Stefan Szymanski & Jason Winfree, 2018. "On The Optimal Realignment Of A Contest: The Case Of College Football," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(1), pages 483-496, January.
    5. Sarah Marx Quintanar & Cary Deck & Javier A. Reyes & Sudipta Sarangi, 2015. "You Are Close To Your Rival And Everybody Hates A Winner : A Study Of Rivalry In College Football," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 53(4), pages 1908-1918, October.
    6. Xin Meng & Zilin Tang & Leonard F. S. Wang, 2023. "Sport tickets pricing strategy with home team's crowd effect," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 839-847, March.
    7. Paul A. Natke & Elizabeth A. Thomas, 2019. "Does a marching band impact college Football game attendance? A panel study of Division II," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(16), pages 1354-1357, September.
    8. Gregory A. Falls & Paul A. Natke & Linlan Xiao, 2022. "College football attendance in the long run: The Football Championship Subdivision," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2172-2183, September.
    9. Watanabe, Nicholas M. & Yan, Grace & Soebbing, Brian P., 2019. "Market disruption as a regime for athlete activism: An economic analysis of college football player protests," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 600-612.
    10. Ken Sanford & Frank Scott, 2016. "Assessing the Intensity of Sports Rivalries Using Data From Secondary Market Transactions," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 17(2), pages 159-174, February.
    11. McDonald P. Mirabile, 2015. "The Determinants of Attendance at Neutral Site College Football Games," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 191-204, April.
    12. Jensen Jonathan A. & Turner Brian A., 2014. "What if statisticians ran college football? A re-conceptualization of the football bowl subdivision," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 37-48, January.
    13. Nicholas Masafumi Watanabe & George B Cunningham, 2020. "The impact of race relations on NFL attendance: An econometric analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Caro Cary A., 2018. "The Impact of Competitive Markets on Recruiting: Lessons from Collegiate Athletics," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 79(1), pages 25-35, June.
    15. Stacey L. Brook, 2019. "An estimation of NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision demand as a two‐part tariff," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 79-83, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:22:y:2015:i:15:p:1209-1223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.