IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jodepp/v5y2020i1p9-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development, Ecology and Climate Change: Resistance by the Peasantry

Author

Listed:
  • Ole Busck
  • Johannes Dragsbaek Schmidt

Abstract

Critical theory like political ecology and peasant studies point to the insufficiency of adaptation strategies and call for more radical alternatives, such as the abandonment of development strategies based on fossil-fuelled industrialisation and urban-centred economic growth. They favour rural livelihood strategies based on sustainable natural resource management and organic/agro-ecological production, thus combining genuine development with resistance to the hegemony of that neoliberal-driven transformation of fundamental socio-economic structures in developing countries. This is associated with detrimental climatic and ecological consequences. This article offers a theoretical and conceptual framework for understanding the nexus of development, ecology and climate change, and explores significant patterns of community resistance evolving into promising strategies of reactions ‘from below’ against growth-driven development implicating ecocide. Such resistance opposes the regional and global obsession with excessive growth and poses new challenges to the international political system.

Suggested Citation

  • Ole Busck & Johannes Dragsbaek Schmidt, 2020. "Development, Ecology and Climate Change: Resistance by the Peasantry," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 5(1), pages 9-31, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jodepp:v:5:y:2020:i:1:p:9-31
    DOI: 10.1177/2455133320909912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2455133320909912
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2455133320909912?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dan Brockington & Stefano Ponte, 2015. "The Green Economy in the global South: experiences, redistributions and resistance," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(12), pages 2197-2206, December.
    2. Saturnino M. Borras & Jennifer C. Franco, 2018. "The challenge of locating land-based climate change mitigation and adaptation politics within a social justice perspective: towards an idea of agrarian climate justice," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 1308-1325, July.
    3. Carl Death, 2015. "Four discourses of the green economy in the global South," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(12), pages 2207-2224, December.
    4. Marc Edelman & Carlos Oya & Saturnino M Borras, 2013. "Global Land Grabs: historical processes, theoretical and methodological implications and current trajectories," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9), pages 1517-1531, October.
    5. Harvey, David, 2005. "The New Imperialism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199278084, Decembrie.
    6. Saturnino M Borras & Jennifer C Franco, 2013. "Global Land Grabbing and Political Reactions ‘From Below’," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9), pages 1723-1747, October.
    7. Sachs, Jeffrey D. & Warner, Andrew M., 2001. "The curse of natural resources," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(4-6), pages 827-838, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borras, Saturnino M. & Franco, Jennifer C. & Nam, Zau, 2020. "Climate change and land: Insights from Myanmar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Engström, Linda & Bélair, Joanny & Blache, Adriana, 2022. "Formalising village land dispossession? An aggregate analysis of the combined effects of the land formalisation and land acquisition agendas in Tanzania," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Femke van Noorloos & Christien Klaufus & Griet Steel, 2019. "Land in urban debates: Unpacking the grab–development dichotomy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(5), pages 855-867, April.
    4. Nanhthavong, Vong & Bieri, Sabin & Nguyen, Anh-Thu & Hett, Cornelia & Epprecht, Michael, 2022. "Proletarianization and gateways to precarization in the context of land-based investments for agricultural commercialization in Lao PDR," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    5. Tola Gemechu Ango, 2018. "“Medium-Scale” Forestland Grabbing in the Southwestern Highlands of Ethiopia: Impacts on Local Livelihoods and Forest Conservation," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Hochstetler, Kathryn, 2025. "The green economy and the Global South," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127335, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Hurtado-Hurtado, Carolina & Ortiz-Miranda, Dionisio & Arnalte-Alegre, Eladio, 2024. "Disentangling the paths of land grabbing in Colombia: The role of the state and legal mechanisms," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    8. Natacha Bruna, 2019. "Land of Plenty, Land of Misery: Synergetic Resource Grabbing in Mozambique," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Diana Mincytė & Renata Blumberg, 2024. "Family farms through the lens of geopolitics: rethinking agency and power in the Baltic borderlands," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(4), pages 1317-1333, December.
    10. Borras, Saturnino M. & Franco, Jennifer C. & Moreda, Tsegaye & Xu, Yunan & Bruna, Natacha & Afewerk Demena, Binyam, 2022. "The value of so-called ‘failed’ large-scale land acquisitions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    11. Uson, M., 2015. "Grabbing the 'clean slate' : The politics of the intersection of land grabbing, disasters and climate change," ISS Working Papers - General Series 603, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    12. Tamura, Yu, 2021. "Contexts behind differentiated responses to contract farming and large-scale land acquisitions in Central Mozambique: Post-war experiences, social relations, and power balance of local authorities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    13. Mariko L. Frame, 2022. "Ecological Imperialism: A World‐Systems Approach," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 81(3), pages 503-534, May.
    14. Dell'Angelo, Jampel & Navas, Grettel & Witteman, Marga & D'Alisa, Giacomo & Scheidel, Arnim & Temper, Leah, 2021. "Commons grabbing and agribusiness: Violence, resistance and social mobilization," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    15. Vorbrugg, Alexander (Форбруг, Александр), 2018. "Not about land, not quite a grab: Dispersed dispossession in rural Russia [Не Только О Земле И О Ее Захватах: Дисперсное Лишение Прав В Сельской России]," Russian Peasant Studies, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 3, pages 19-47.
    16. Balima, Hippolyte Weneyam, 2020. "Coups d’état and the cost of debt," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 509-528.
    17. Guy Michaels, 2011. "The Long Term Consequences of Resource‐Based Specialisation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(551), pages 31-57, March.
    18. Carsten Hefeker & Sebastian G. Kessing, 2017. "Competition for natural resources and the hold-up problem," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 50(3), pages 871-888, August.
    19. Carlos Morales, 2011. "Variedades de recursos naturales y crecimiento económico," Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, Universidad de los Andes,Facultad de Economía, CEDE, December.
    20. Hervé Corvellec & Johan Hultman & Anne Jerneck & Susanne Arvidsson & Johan Ekroos & Niklas Wahlberg & Timothy W. Luke, 2021. "Resourcification: A non‐essentialist theory of resources for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1249-1256, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jodepp:v:5:y:2020:i:1:p:9-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.