IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v51y2007i3p408-430.html

Personality Traits and Foreign Policy Attitudes in German Public Opinion

Author

Listed:
  • Harald Schoen

    (Department of Political Science Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany)

Abstract

This article examines the effects of personality traits on attitudes toward foreign policy issues among the German public. Building on previous research, it argues that personality characteristics shape an individual's motivation, goals, and values, thereby providing criteria to evaluate external stimuli and affecting foreign policy opinions. An analysis of survey data from a random sample of Germans eligible to vote confirms that the personality traits play a role in attitudes toward foreign policy issues. By and large, personality affects foreign policy opinions roughly as strongly as traditional factors such as partisanship, ideology, and social background. Among the traits studied, agreeableness and openness render persons more supportive of international cooperation and more skeptical of the use of military force, whereas conscientiousness exhibits reverse effects. Thus, personality traits merit serious attention in analyses of public opinion on foreign policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Harald Schoen, 2007. "Personality Traits and Foreign Policy Attitudes in German Public Opinion," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 51(3), pages 408-430, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:51:y:2007:i:3:p:408-430
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002707300180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002707300180
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002707300180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hurwitz, Jon & Peffley, Mark, 1987. "How are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical Model," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 81(4), pages 1099-1120, December.
    2. Page, Benjamin I. & Shapiro, Robert Y., 1983. "Effects of Public Opinion on Policy," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 77(1), pages 175-190, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mujtaba Isani & Bernd Schlipphak, 2017. "The Desire for Sovereignty – An Explanation of EU Attitudes in the Arab World," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 502-517, May.
    2. Brender, Agnes, 2018. "Government Ideology and Arms Exports," ILE Working Paper Series 21, University of Hamburg, Institute of Law and Economics.
    3. Julie Hassing Nielsen, 2016. "Personality and Euroscepticism: The Impact of Personality on Attitudes Towards the EU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(5), pages 1175-1198, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qian Liu & Yingying Wang & Ning Kang, 2023. "Analyzing the Influence of BRI Foreign Direct Investment on Governance: Perspective from Southeast Asian Countries," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 15(2), pages 289-305, May.
    2. Eivind Hoff-Elimari & Anat Bardi & Simon Matti & Kristina Östman, 2014. "Collective action problems: Disentangling possible feedback loops between government policies and the public’s value-change," European Journal of Government and Economics, Europa Grande, vol. 3(1), pages 24-46, June.
    3. Miroslav Nincic, 1992. "A Sensible Public," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(4), pages 772-789, December.
    4. David H. Bearce & Thomas R. Cook, 2018. "The first image reversed: IGO signals and mass political attitudes," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 595-619, December.
    5. Philip J. Powlick, 1991. "The Attitudinal Bases for Responsiveness to Public Opinion among American Foreign Policy Officials," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(4), pages 611-641, December.
    6. Ronald H. Hinckley, 1988. "Public Attitudes toward Key Foreign Policy Events," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(2), pages 295-318, June.
    7. Niklas Harring & Sverker C. Jagers & Simon Matti, 2017. "Public Support for Pro-Environmental Policy Measures: Examining the Impact of Personal Values and Ideology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, April.
    8. repec:osf:osfxxx:y79u5_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Hank C. Jenkins-Smith & Neil J. Mitchell & Kerry G. Herron, 2004. "Foreign and Domestic Policy Belief Structures in the U.S. and British Publics," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 48(3), pages 287-309, June.
    10. Bakry, Assem M. & Darweesh, Salah, 1997. "Deep level defects in n- and p-type Fe implanted InP," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 161-165.
    11. Lamberova, Natalia, 2021. "The puzzling politics of R&D: Signaling competence through risky projects," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 801-818.
    12. Sarah D Kowitt & Seth M Noar & Leah M Ranney & Adam O Goldstein, 2017. "Public attitudes toward larger cigarette pack warnings: Results from a nationally representative U.S. sample," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, March.
    13. Nicole J Saam & Carmen Friedrich & Henriette Engelhardt, 2022. "The value conflict between freedom and security: Explaining the variation of COVID-19 policies in democracies and autocracies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Jeffrey W. Knopf, 1998. "How Rational Is “The Rational Public†?," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(5), pages 544-571, October.
    15. Bin Tang & Huimin Yu & Dechen Zhu, 2025. "Building Child-Friendly Cities: Role of Infringement Incidents in Policy Agenda Setting," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 18(3), pages 1277-1303, June.
    16. Robert Y. Shapiro & Benjamin I. Page, 1988. "Foreign Policy and the Rational Public," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(2), pages 211-247, June.
    17. Mohammad Reza Farzanegan & Sven Fischer, 2022. "Who supports war for justice and why? Evidence from Russia and Ukraine," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202216, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    18. Philipp Harms & Nils D. Steiner, 2023. "Attitudes towards Globalization: A Survey," Working Papers 2305, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    19. Jeremy Horpedahl, 2019. "Do the poor want to be regulated? Public opinion surveys on regulation in the United States, 1981–2002," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 27-42, July.
    20. Matthias Mader & Moritz Neubert & Felix Münchow & Stephanie C Hofmann & Harald Schoen & Konstantin Gavras, 2024. "Crumbling in the face of cost? How cost considerations affect public support for European security and defence cooperation," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(3), pages 483-503, September.
    21. Efe Tokdemir, 2021. "Feels like home: Effect of transnational identities on attitudes towards foreign countries," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(5), pages 1034-1048, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:51:y:2007:i:3:p:408-430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.