IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jocore/v40y1996i3p502-516.html

When Is Universal Contribution Best for the Group?

Author

Listed:
  • Norman Frohlich

    (Faculty of Management, University of Manitoba)

  • Joe Oppenheimer

    (Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland)

Abstract

Social scientists from a variety of disciplines have long been captivated by the simplicity and elegance of the two-person, binary choice prisoners' dilemma (2 × 2 PD). Over the years, the domain of the research has been extended and applied to events that are neither two person nor binary. We use a defining characteristic of the 2 × 2 PD to identify situations under which full levels of contribution are suboptimal. We propose, on the basis of that characteristic, an extended definition and categorization of prisoners' dilemmas to n-person and nonbinary situations. The new distinction is shown to point to differing normative and strategic imperatives for the different categories of games.

Suggested Citation

  • Norman Frohlich & Joe Oppenheimer, 1996. "When Is Universal Contribution Best for the Group?," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(3), pages 502-516, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:40:y:1996:i:3:p:502-516
    DOI: 10.1177/0022002796040003006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022002796040003006
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0022002796040003006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary Miller, 1977. "Bureaucratic compliance as a game on the unit square," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 37-51, March.
    2. Sen, Amartya Kumar, 1970. "The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal," Scholarly Articles 3612779, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    3. Sen, Amartya, 1970. "The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(1), pages 152-157, Jan.-Feb..
    4. John Aldrich, 1977. "Liberal games: Further comments on social choice and game theory," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 29-34, June.
    5. Peter Bernholz, 1976. "Liberalism, Logrolling, And Cyclical Group Preferences," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 26-38, January.
    6. Nicholas Miller, 1977. "“Social preference” and game theory: A comment on “the dilemma of a paretian liberal”," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 23-28, June.
    7. Frohlich, Norman, 1992. "An Impartial Reasoning Solution to the Prisoner's Dilemma," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 447-460, December.
    8. Ostrom, Elinor & Walker, James & Gardner, Roy, 1992. "Covenants with and without a Sword: Self-Governance Is Possible," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 86(2), pages 404-417, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard N. Langlois, 2002. "Modularity in Technology and Organization," Chapters, in: Nicolai J. Foss & Peter G. Klein (ed.), Entrepreneurship and the Firm, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Wiebke Kuklys & Ingrid Robeyns, 2004. "Sens's Capability Approach to Welfare Economics," Papers on Strategic Interaction 2004-03, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group.
    3. Ben McQuillin & Robert Sugden, 2011. "The representation of alienable and inalienable rights: games in transition function form," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 37(4), pages 683-706, October.
    4. Antoinette Baujard, 2016. "Utilitarianism and anti-utilitarianism," Chapters, in: Gilbert Faccarello & Heinz D. Kurz (ed.), Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume III, chapter 40, pages 576-588, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Kretz, Claudio, 2021. "Consistent rights on property spaces," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    6. Broussolle, Damien, 2005. "Internal consistency of choice, Sen and the spirit of revealed preferences: A behaviorist approach," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 605-620, October.
    7. Leo Katz & Alvaro Sandroni, 2020. "Limits on power and rationality," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 54(2), pages 507-521, March.
    8. Andreas P. Kyriacou, 2005. "Rationality, Ethnicity And Institutions: A Survey Of Issues And Results," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 23-42, February.
    9. Michael Munger, 2006. "A Life Reexamined," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 499-500, September.
    10. Peter Cserne, "undated". "Freedom of choice and paternalism in contract law: a law and economics perspective," German Working Papers in Law and Economics 2006-1-1139, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    11. John W. Patty & Elizabeth Maggie Penn, 2022. "Algorithmic Fairness and Statistical Discrimination," Papers 2208.08341, arXiv.org.
    12. E. Guzzini & A. Palestrini, 2012. "Coase theorem and exchangeable rights in non-cooperative games," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 83-100, February.
    13. Youngsheng Xu & Naoki Yoshihara, 2019. "Efficiency invites Divide and Coercion in the Age of Increasing Returns to Scale," Working Papers SDES-2019-12, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised Nov 2019.
    14. Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit, 2020. "Arrow’s decisive coalitions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 54(2), pages 463-505, March.
    15. Gennady Bilych, 2014. "The Theory of Justice and Profit Maximization," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(1), pages 188-210, June.
    16. Bernholz, Peter, 1997. "Property rights, contracts, cyclical social preferences and the Coase theorem: A synthesis," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 419-442, September.
    17. Antoinette Baujard, 2006. "Une critique opérationnelle du welfarisme dans la prise de décision publique," Post-Print halshs-00155130, HAL.
    18. Mariotti, Marco & Veneziani, Roberto, 2013. "On the impossibility of complete Non-Interference in Paretian social judgements," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(4), pages 1689-1699.
    19. Athanassios Pitsoulis & Steffen Groß, 2015. "“The other side of the argument”: Isaiah Berlin versus F. A. von Hayek on liberty, public policies, and the market," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 475-494, December.
    20. Héctor Hermida-Rivera, 2025. "The implementability of liberalism," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 203(3), pages 493-501, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jocore:v:40:y:1996:i:3:p:502-516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.