IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intdis/v16y2020i3p1550147720911558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability evaluation of dynamic face recognition systems based on improved Fuzzy Dynamic Bayesian Network

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiqiang Liu
  • Wenbo Zhu
  • Hongzhou Zhang
  • Shengjin Wang
  • Lu Fang
  • Weijun Hong
  • Hua Shao
  • Guopeng Wang

Abstract

The reliability of face recognition system has the characteristics of fuzziness, randomness, and continuity. In order to measure it in unconstrained scenes, we find out and quantify key broad-sense and narrow-sense influencing factors of reliability on the basis of analyzing operation states for six dynamic face recognition systems in the practical use of six public security bureaus. In this article, we propose a novel evaluation method with True Positive Identification Rate in dynamic and M:N mode and create a novel evaluation model of system reliability with the improved Fuzzy Dynamic Bayesian Network. Subsequently, we infer to solve the fuzzy reliability state probabilities of the six systems with Netica and get two most important factors with the improved fuzzy C-means algorithm. We verify the model by comparing the evaluation results with actual achievements of these systems. Finally, we find several vulnerabilities in the system with the least reliability and put forward a few optimization strategies. The proposed method combines advantages of the improved fuzzy C-means model with those of the dynamic Bayesian network to evaluate the reliability of the dynamic face recognition systems, making the evaluation results more reasonable and realistic. It starts a new research of face recognition systems in unconstrained scenes and contributes to the research on face recognition performance evaluation and system reliability analysis. Besides, the proposed method is of practical significance in improving the reliability of the systems in use.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiqiang Liu & Wenbo Zhu & Hongzhou Zhang & Shengjin Wang & Lu Fang & Weijun Hong & Hua Shao & Guopeng Wang, 2020. "Reliability evaluation of dynamic face recognition systems based on improved Fuzzy Dynamic Bayesian Network," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(3), pages 15501477209, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:16:y:2020:i:3:p:1550147720911558
    DOI: 10.1177/1550147720911558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1550147720911558
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1550147720911558?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Dooyoul & Choi, Dongsu, 2020. "Analysis of the reliability of a starter-generator using a dynamic Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Khakzad, Nima & Landucci, Gabriele & Reniers, Genserik, 2017. "Application of dynamic Bayesian network to performance assessment of fire protection systems during domino effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 232-247.
    3. Ajith Tom James & O. P. Gandhi & S. G. Deshmukh, 2018. "Fault diagnosis of automobile systems using fault tree based on digraph modeling," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(2), pages 494-508, April.
    4. A. N. Patowary & J. Hazarika & G. L. Sriwastav, 2018. "Reliability estimation of multi-component cascade system through Monte-Carlo simulation," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(6), pages 1279-1286, December.
    5. Chang, Yuanjiang & Wu, Xiangfei & Zhang, Changshuai & Chen, Guoming & Liu, Xiuquan & Li, Jiayi & Cai, Baoping & Xu, Liangbin, 2019. "Dynamic Bayesian networks based approach for risk analysis of subsea wellhead fatigue failure during service life," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 454-462.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Yinuo & Tian, Zhigang & He, Rui & Wang, Yifei & Xie, Shuyi, 2023. "Discovery of potential risks for the gas transmission station using monitoring data and the OOBN method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    2. Chuan Wang & Jun Gou & Yingcheng Tian & Hao Jin & Chao Yu & Yupeng Liu & Jiajun Ma & Yong Xia, 2022. "Reliability and availability evaluation of subsea high integrity pressure protection system using stochastic Petri net," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(3), pages 508-521, June.
    3. Chen, Chao & Yang, Ming & Reniers, Genserik, 2021. "A dynamic stochastic methodology for quantifying HAZMAT storage resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Bahareh Tajiani & Jørn Vatn, 2023. "Adaptive remaining useful life prediction framework with stochastic failure threshold for experimental bearings with different lifetimes under contaminated condition," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(5), pages 1756-1777, October.
    5. Zhang, Jiusi & Jiang, Yuchen & Li, Xiang & Huo, Mingyi & Luo, Hao & Yin, Shen, 2022. "An adaptive remaining useful life prediction approach for single battery with unlabeled small sample data and parameter uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    6. Khakzad, Nima, 2021. "Optimal firefighting to prevent domino effects: Methodologies based on dynamic influence diagram and mathematical programming," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    7. Adumene, Sidum & Khan, Faisal & Adedigba, Sunday & Zendehboudi, Sohrab & Shiri, Hodjat, 2021. "Dynamic risk analysis of marine and offshore systems suffering microbial induced stochastic degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    8. Singh, Kritika & Maiti, J, 2020. "A novel data mining approach for analysis of accident paths and performance assessment of risk control systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    9. Khakzad, Nima, 2023. "A methodology based on Dijkstra's algorithm and mathematical programming for optimal evacuation in process plants in the event of major tank fires," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    10. Misuri, Alessio & Landucci, Gabriele & Cozzani, Valerio, 2021. "Assessment of risk modification due to safety barrier performance degradation in Natech events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    11. Dongshi Sun & Di Guo & Danlan Xie, 2023. "Using Multicriteria Decision Making to Evaluate the Risk of Hydrogen Energy Storage and Transportation in Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-27, January.
    12. Fam, Mei Ling & He, Xuhong & Konovessis, Dimitrios & Ong, Lin Seng, 2020. "Using Dynamic Bayesian Belief Network for analysing well decommissioning failures and long-term monitoring of decommissioned wells," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    13. Guo, Yunlong & Jin, Yongxing & Hu, Shenping & Yang, Zaili & Xi, Yongtao & Han, Bing, 2023. "Risk evolution analysis of ship pilotage operation by an integrated model of FRAM and DBN," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    14. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & José Torres Farinha & José Edmundo de Almeida e Pais, 2021. "An Integrated Fuzzy Fault Tree Model with Bayesian Network-Based Maintenance Optimization of Complex Equipment in Automotive Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    15. Moradi, Ramin & Cofre-Martel, Sergio & Lopez Droguett, Enrique & Modarres, Mohammad & Groth, Katrina M., 2022. "Integration of deep learning and Bayesian networks for condition and operation risk monitoring of complex engineering systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    16. Guo, Xiaoxue & Ding, Long & Ji, Jie & Cozzani, Valerio, 2022. "A cost-effective optimization model of safety investment allocation for risk reduction of domino effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    17. Wojciech Wawrzyński & Mariusz Zieja & Justyna Tomaszewska & Mariusz Michalski, 2021. "Reliability Assessment of Aircraft Commutators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Mohamed Alawadhi & Jumah Almazrouie & Mohammed Kamil & Khalil Abdelrazek Khalil, 0. "Review and analysis of the importance of autonomous vehicles liability: a systematic literature review," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    19. Martin Folch-Calvo & Francisco Brocal-Fernández & Cristina González-Gaya & Miguel A. Sebastián, 2020. "Analysis and Characterization of Risk Methodologies Applied to Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-35, September.
    20. Jinhua Mi & Yuhua Cheng & Yufei Song & Libing Bai & Kai Chen, 2022. "Application of dynamic evidential networks in reliability analysis of complex systems with epistemic uncertainty and multiple life distributions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 311-333, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:16:y:2020:i:3:p:1550147720911558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.