IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v248y2024ics0951832024002278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability analysis of subsea control module based on dynamic Bayesian network and digital twin

Author

Listed:
  • Tao, Haohan
  • Jia, Peng
  • Wang, Xiangyu
  • Wang, Liquan

Abstract

The reliability evaluation of the subsea control module(SCM) is the key to ensure the safety and stability of subsea oil-gas production. The failure probability and reliability of SCM components are dependent on time and working conditions. To analyze the SCMs’ reliability considering varying working conditions, this paper proposed a new digital twin and dynamic Bayesian network(DBN) based model utilizing historical working condition data in reliability analysis. In the proposed framework, critical working condition data is obtained by sensor-based Digital Twin(DT) simulation and used for dynamically updating the parameters in the DBN reliability analysis model. The reliability evaluation of an actual SCM electric system was carried out. The results revealed the most probable failure mode and the most vulnerable components in the system. Finally, the fault prediction based on the back-forward analysis capacity of the proposed method was conducted to predict the probability of the faulty device when unexpected failures occur.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao, Haohan & Jia, Peng & Wang, Xiangyu & Wang, Liquan, 2024. "Reliability analysis of subsea control module based on dynamic Bayesian network and digital twin," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:248:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024002278
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024002278
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110153?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:248:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024002278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.