IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inafri/v15y2023i1p46-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Same Same, but Different: Ghana’s Sinohydro Deal as Evolved ‘Angola Model’?

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Purwins

Abstract

Ghana has gained international attention due to a controversial deal, which it has entered with the Chinese Sinohydro Corporation Limited. Sinohydro is investing $2 billion in infrastructure development, in return for refined bauxite over a 15-year period. When it comes to resource-backed loans between China and African governments, these types of cooperation are widely known as the Angola Model. Besides the criticism of resource-secured lending, in some African countries, these practices are declined, while in others it continues, but also evolve. For example in Guinea and in Ghana. This article takes a closer look at the structure and concerns regarding Ghana’s Sinohydro deal in comparison to the Angola Model. The main difference appears to be (a) the established para-state company charged with managing the extraction of bauxite and (b) the plans to develop an integrated bauxite–aluminum industry within Ghana. On the other side, environmental concerns regarding bypassing regulations or possible pollution remain the same.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Purwins, 2023. "Same Same, but Different: Ghana’s Sinohydro Deal as Evolved ‘Angola Model’?," Insight on Africa, , vol. 15(1), pages 46-70, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:inafri:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:46-70
    DOI: 10.1177/09750878221114381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09750878221114381
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09750878221114381?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Habiyaremye, Alexis, 2016. "Is Sino-African trade exacerbating resource dependence in Africa?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Brautigam, Deborah & Hwang, Jyhjong, 2016. "Eastern Promises: New Data on Chinese Loans in Africa, 2000 to 2014," SAIS-CARI Working Papers 2016/4, Johns Hopkins University, School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), China Africa Research Initiative (CARI).
    3. Landry, David, 2018. "The risks and rewards of resource-for-infrastructure deals: Lessons from the Congo's Sicomines agreement," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 165-174.
    4. Economy, Elizabeth & Levi, Michael, 2014. "By All Means Necessary: How China's Resource Quest is Changing the World," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199921782.
    5. Havard Halland & John Beardsworth & Bryan Land & James Schmidt, 2014. "Resource Financed Infrastructure : A Discussion on a New Form of Infrastructure Financing [Infrastructures financées par des ressources naturelles : Examen d'un nouveau mode de financement des infr," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 18554, December.
    6. Brooks, Andrew, 2017. "The End of Development," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9781786990211, Febrero.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mihalyi,David & Hwang,Jyhjong & Rivetti,Diego & Cust,James Frederick, 2022. "Resource-Backed Loans in Sub-Saharan Africa," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9923, The World Bank.
    2. Tom Ogwang & Frank Vanclay, 2021. "Resource-Financed Infrastructure: Thoughts on Four Chinese-Financed Projects in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Carsten Hefeker & Sebastian G. Kessing, 2017. "Competition for natural resources and the hold-up problem," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 50(3), pages 871-888, August.
    4. Xu, Jiajun & Ru, Xinshun & Song, Pengcheng, 2021. "Can a new model of infrastructure financing mitigate credit rationing in poorly governed countries?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 111-120.
    5. Marson, Marta & Savin, Ivan, 2022. "Complementary or adverse? Comparing development results of official funding from China and traditional donors in Africa," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 189-206.
    6. Rocío Rodríguez-Rivero & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Javier Romero & Luis Ballesteros-Sánchez, 2020. "Finding the Links between Risk Management and Project Success: Evidence from International Development Projects in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Richey, Lisa Ann & Ponte, Stefano, 2021. "Brand Aid and coffee value chain development interventions: Is Starbucks working aid out of business?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    8. Tom Goodfellow & Zhengli Huang, 2021. "Contingent infrastructure and the dilution of ‘Chineseness’: Reframing roads and rail in Kampala and Addis Ababa," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(4), pages 655-674, June.
    9. Jean-Pascal Nganou & Juste Some & Guy Tchuente, 2016. "Government Spending Multipliers in Natural Resource-Rich Developing Countries," Studies in Economics 1609, School of Economics, University of Kent.
    10. Anthony J. Venables, 2016. "Using Natural Resources for Development: Why Has It Proven So Difficult?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(1), pages 161-184, Winter.
    11. Landry, David, 2018. "The risks and rewards of resource-for-infrastructure deals: Lessons from the Congo's Sicomines agreement," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 165-174.
    12. Jun Rentschler & Morgan Bazilian, 2017. "Policy Monitor—Principles for Designing Effective Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reforms," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(1), pages 138-155.
    13. Kinfack, Emilie & Bonga-Bonga, Lumengo, 2020. "Trade Linkages and Business Cycle Co-movement: Analysis of Trade between African Economies and their Main Trading partners," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 73(2), pages 275-306.
    14. Liviu Stelian Begu & Maria Denisa Vasilescu & Larisa Stanila & Roxana Clodnitchi, 2018. "China-Angola Investment Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Clément Anne, 2016. "Are Commodity Price Booms an Opportunity to Diversify? Evidence from Resource-dependent Countries," Working Papers halshs-01381143, HAL.
    16. Claudio-Quiroga, Gloria & Gil-Alana, Luis A. & Maiza-Larrarte, Andoni, 2023. "Mineral prices persistence and the development of a new energy vehicle industry in China: A fractional integration approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    17. Wei Yang & Feihuang Xue & Jinfeng Shi & Yanmin Shao & Di Wang, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Trade Dependence Relationship of Asian Countries with China: Implications for China’s Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, September.
    18. Clement ANNE, 2016. "Are Commodity Price Booms an Opportunity to Diversify? Evidence from Resource-dependent Countries," Working Papers 201615, CERDI.
    19. Mukwaya, Rodgers & Mold, Andrew, 2018. "Modelling the economic impact of the China Belt and Road Initiative on countries in Eastern Africa," Conference papers 333014, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    20. Dollar, David, 2017. "United States-China two-way direct investment: Opportunities and challenges," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 14-26.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inafri:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:46-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.