IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v76y2023i1p135-159.html

Remote Work and Post-Bureaucracy: Unintended Consequences of Work Design for Gender Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Kim de Laat

Abstract

In-depth interviews with IT employees ( N = 84) working under two types of work design—a post-bureaucratic work design labeled “agile,†and a bureaucratic work design labeled “waterfall†—are used to examine gendered patterns in the adoption of remote work. Interviews reveal an unintended consequence of the agile model: It promotes a physical orientation that induces on-site work. Agile is gender-inegalitarian, with more women than men working remotely despite its perceived unacceptability, and low numbers of employees working remotely overall. By contrast, workers within a waterfall work design express a digital orientation to work and feel empowered to work remotely. The waterfall model is associated with gender egalitarianism; most employees opt to work remotely, and men and women do so in even numbers. Findings suggest that when compared to the post-bureaucratic work design, the bureaucratic work design provides more flexibility. This article refines our understanding of barriers to remote work and provides a lens on the gender dynamics underlying work design.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim de Laat, 2023. "Remote Work and Post-Bureaucracy: Unintended Consequences of Work Design for Gender Inequality," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 76(1), pages 135-159, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:76:y:2023:i:1:p:135-159
    DOI: 10.1177/00197939221076134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00197939221076134
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00197939221076134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen R. Barley & Gideon Kunda, 2001. "Bringing Work Back In," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 76-95, February.
    2. Erin Reid, 2015. "Embracing, Passing, Revealing, and the Ideal Worker Image: How People Navigate Expected and Experienced Professional Identities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 997-1017, August.
    3. Forrest Briscoe, 2007. "From Iron Cage to Iron Shield? How Bureaucracy Enables Temporal Flexibility for Professional Service Workers," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 297-314, April.
    4. Huub J.M. Ruël & Tanya Bondarouk & Stefan Smink, 2010. "The Waterfall Approach and Requirement Uncertainty: An In-Depth Case Study of an Enterprise Systems Implementation at a Major Airline Company," International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 43-60, April.
    5. Heejung Chung, 2020. "Gender, Flexibility Stigma and the Perceived Negative Consequences of Flexible Working in the UK," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 521-545, September.
    6. Alison T. Wynn & Aliya Hamid Rao, 2020. "Failures of Flexibility: How Perceived Control Motivates the Individualization of Work–Life Conflict," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 73(1), pages 61-90, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isabelle Allemand & Phan Huy Hieu Tran & Thu Ha Tran, 2025. "Women in Power and Female Employment," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 78(2), pages 304-329, March.
    2. Vanessa M. Conzon & James C. Mellody, 2025. "Concerted Quantification: How Knowledge Workers Limit Overwork While Maintaining Client Satisfaction," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1834-1860, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalya M. Alonso & Olivia (Mandy) O’Neill, 2022. "Going Along to Get Ahead: The Asymmetric Effects of Sexist Joviality on Status Conferral," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 1794-1815, September.
    2. Emily D. Heaphy & Špela Trefalt, 2024. "Hiding in Plain Sight: Co-Enacting the Sustainable Worker Schema in a Consulting Firm," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1271-1298, July.
    3. Vanessa M. Conzon & James C. Mellody, 2025. "Concerted Quantification: How Knowledge Workers Limit Overwork While Maintaining Client Satisfaction," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1834-1860, September.
    4. Vanessa Conzon & Ruthanne Huising, 2024. "Devoted but Disconnected : Managing Role Conflict Through Interactional Control," Post-Print hal-04553331, HAL.
    5. Melissa A. Valentine & Amy C. Edmondson, 2015. "Team Scaffolds: How Mesolevel Structures Enable Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Groups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 405-422, April.
    6. Ruth Bhekekile Shandu & Thokozani Ian Nzimakwe & Reward Utete, 2024. "Analysing the effects of flexible working conditions in the workplace: An exploratory study," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 6(6), pages 109-120, December.
    7. Barrett, Michael & Cooper, David J. & Jamal, Karim, 2005. "Globalization and the coordinating of work in multinational audits," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Namrata Malhotra & Timothy Morris, 2009. "Heterogeneity in Professional Service Firms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 895-922, September.
    9. Beth A. Bechky, 2006. "Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 3-21, February.
    10. Lucie Noury & Stéphan Pezé & Sébastien Gand, 2026. ""Consultants Who Pick Up Their Children Every Day Don't Exist": How Professionals Experience Conflicting Norms Through Successive Gendered Trials," Post-Print hal-05539480, HAL.
    11. Merkel, Janet & Suwala, Lech, 2021. "Intermediaries, work and creativity in creative and innovative sectors. The case of Berlin," EconStor Open Access Book Chapters, in: Culture, Creativity and Economy. Collaborative practices, value creation and spaces of creativity., pages 56-69, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    12. Ricardo Azambuja & Gazi Islam, 2019. "Working at the boundaries: Middle managerial work as a source of emancipation and alienation," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01959107, HAL.
    13. Naylor, Mary D. & Hirschman, Karen B. & Toles, Mark P. & Jarrín, Olga F. & Shaid, Elizabeth & Pauly, Mark V., 2018. "Adaptations of the evidence-based Transitional Care Model in the U.S," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 28-36.
    14. Erin A. Cech & William R. Rothwell, 2020. "LGBT Workplace Inequality in the Federal Workforce: Intersectional Processes, Organizational Contexts, and Turnover Considerations," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 73(1), pages 25-60, January.
    15. David C. Chan, 2018. "The Efficiency of Slacking off: Evidence From the Emergency Department," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 997-1030, May.
    16. Richard A. Hunt & Mathew L. A. Hayward, 2018. "Value Creation Through Employer Loans: Evidence of Informal Lending to Employees at Small, Labor-Intensive Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 284-303, April.
    17. Prithwiraj Choudhury & Kevin Crowston & Linus Dahlander & Marco S. Minervini & Sumita Raghuram, 2020. "GitLab: work where you want, when you want," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Carrie Oelberger, 2024. "Work Devotion as Identity Armor? How Single Professionals with Relationship Aspirations Use Career Decisions to Manage Their Identities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1443-1472, July.
    19. Kingshuk K. Sinha & Andrew H. Van de Ven, 2005. "Designing Work Within and Between Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 389-408, August.
    20. Eliot L. Sherman, 2020. "Discretionary Remote Working Helps Mothers Without Harming Non-mothers: Evidence from a Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1351-1374, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:76:y:2023:i:1:p:135-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.