IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v6y2005i1p41-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of Managers

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Abdul Azeem

    (Mohammed Abdul Azeem is Lecturer at Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad. E-mail: azeem1234@rediffmail.com)

Abstract

Managerial effectiveness means handling managerial functions with competence, which reflects the smooth working operations over a period of time, obtained within the laid down parameters of cost, time and productivity. Efficiency focuses on the input–output ratio, while effectiveness focuses on generating revenues, creating new markets and launching new products. To study the effectiveness of managers, the study has been carried out in two public and private sector organizations. It has made an attempt to segregate managers into highly effective and less effective groups, with an inter-company comparison.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Abdul Azeem, 2005. "Effectiveness of Managers," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 6(1), pages 41-54, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:6:y:2005:i:1:p:41-54
    DOI: 10.1177/097215090500600104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097215090500600104
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/097215090500600104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Child, 1975. "Managerial And Organizational Factors Associated With Company Performance‐Part Ii. A Contingency Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1‐2), pages 12-27, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weifeng Xu & Qingsong Ruan & Chang Liu, 2019. "Can the Famous University Experience of Top Managers Improve Corporate Performance? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Brian W. Kulik & Timothy Baker, 2008. "Putting the organization back into computational organization theory: a complex Perrowian model of organizational action," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 84-119, June.
    3. Kingshuk K. Sinha & Andrew H. Van de Ven, 2005. "Designing Work Within and Between Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 389-408, August.
    4. Claudio Vitari & Elisabetta Raguseo, 2019. "Big data analytics business value and firm performance: Linking with environmental context," Post-Print hal-02293765, HAL.
    5. Javed, Muzhar & Wang, Fangjun & Usman, Muhammad & Ali Gull, Ammar & Uz Zaman, Qamar, 2023. "Female CEOs and green innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    6. Florence Phua, 2006. "Predicting construction firm performance: an empirical assessment of the differential impact between industry- and firm-specific factors," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 309-320.
    7. Dominic, Theresia & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2015. "The Impact of External and Internal Factors on Strategic Management Practices of Agribusiness Firms in Tanzania," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 197072, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    8. Serra, Francisco & Pointon, John & Abdou, Hussein, 2012. "Factors influencing the propensity to export: A study of UK and Portuguese textile firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 210-224.
    9. Lena Kessel & Lorenz Graf-Vlachy, 2022. "Chief digital officers: the state of the art and the road ahead," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(4), pages 1249-1286, December.
    10. Xie, Xiao-Yun & Feng, Wen & Hu, Qiongjing, 2020. "Does new venture team power hierarchy enhance or impair new venture performance? A contingency perspective," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(6).
    11. Amy Van Looy & Joachim Van den Bergh, 2018. "The Effect of Organization Size and Sector on Adopting Business Process Management," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(6), pages 479-491, December.
    12. Wang, Eric T. G., 2001. "Linking organizational context with structure: a preliminary investigation of the information processing view," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 429-443, October.
    13. Magdalena Abt & Dodo zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, 2017. "Chief human resources officers on top management teams: an empirical analysis of contingency, institutional, and homophily antecedents," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 10(1), pages 49-77, June.
    14. P. Fahad & P. Mubarak Rahman, 2020. "Impact of corporate governance on CSR disclosure," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(2), pages 155-167, September.
    15. Florence Phua, 2005. "Determining the relationship between fee structure and project performance between firms: an empirical study based on institutional and task environment perspectives," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 45-56.
    16. Siyi Deng & Jie He, 2024. "Managerial inclusiveness and corporate innovation in China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(1), pages 381-410, March.
    17. Pascal Nguyen & Nahid Rahman & Ruoyun Zhao, 2018. "CEO characteristics and firm valuation: a quantile regression analysis," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(1), pages 133-151, March.
    18. Driss El Kadiri Boutchich, 2020. "Factors with significant impact on efficiency of research laboratories: case of the public university," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1317-1333, August.
    19. Ya You & Shuba Srinivasan & Koen Pauwels & Amit Joshi, 2020. "How CEO/CMO characteristics affect innovation and stock returns: findings and future directions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 1229-1253, November.
    20. Surajit Bag & Gautam Srivastava & Anass Cherrafi & Ahad Ali & Rajesh Kumar Singh, 2024. "Data‐driven insights for circular and sustainable food supply chains: An empirical exploration of big data and predictive analytics in enhancing social sustainability performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1369-1396, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:6:y:2005:i:1:p:41-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.