IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v18y2017i2p291-307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping Open Innovation: A Bibliometric Review to Compare Developed and Emerging Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Fabianne de Paulo
  • Luísa Cagica Carvalho
  • Maria Teresa G.V. Costa
  • Jose Eduardo F. Lopes
  • Simone V.R. Galina

Abstract

Business and academic interests in open innovation have increased; however, the evolution of this topic in the emerging countries is unknown. This article aims to provide a bibliometric analysis of open innovation in developed and emerging countries. The research has covered 1,925 articles between the years 2000 and 2014 in Web of Science (WoS) database. The terms ‘open innovation’, ‘user innovation’, ‘cumulative innovation, ‘trading know-how’, ‘mass innovation’, ‘distributed innovation’, ‘innovative cooperation’ and ‘collaborative innovation’ have been selected as research keywords, considering their presence in the title, abstract or based on the keywords of the articles. The countries were divided into two groups (developed countries, i.e., G7, and emerging countries, i.e., Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa [BRICS]) depending on the degree of research maturity described in their studies on open innovation. Data analyses have revealed a significant increase in the research on open innovation in the past years. However, it was found that a huge discrepancy exists between the two groups on the number of publications and citations. This study confirms, through a bibliometric analysis, some differences which could be found between the two groups and their influence on the reversal of this scenario, which indirectly affects the development of the emerging countries. It was also found that the groups G7 or BRICS are not statistically important factors for the further development of open innovation research. Analyzing individually, G7 countries have greater relevance in the conduction of studies on open innovation, whereas the BRICS countries are still at an embryonic stage of research on this topic.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Fabianne de Paulo & Luísa Cagica Carvalho & Maria Teresa G.V. Costa & Jose Eduardo F. Lopes & Simone V.R. Galina, 2017. "Mapping Open Innovation: A Bibliometric Review to Compare Developed and Emerging Countries," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(2), pages 291-307, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:18:y:2017:i:2:p:291-307
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150916668600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150916668600
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150916668600?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Su, Hsin-Ning & Lee, Pei-Chun, 2012. "Framing the structure of global open innovation research," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 202-216.
    2. Meeta Dasgupta & A. Sahay & R. K. Gupta, 2009. "The Role of Knowledge Management in Innovation," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(04), pages 317-330.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marta Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado & Juan-José Nájera-Sánchez & Eva-María Mora-Valentín, 2018. "A Research Agenda on Open Innovation and Entrepreneurship: A Co-Word Analysis," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Julián David Cortés-Sánchez, 2019. "Innovation in Latin America through the lens of bibliometrics: crammed and fading away," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(2), pages 869-895, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alok Kumar Singh & Jyoti Verma & Rajeev Verma, 2020. "Understanding Role of Market-orientated IT Competence and Knowledge Sharing Mechanism in Gaining Competitive Advantage," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(2), pages 418-435, April.
    2. Nguyen Thi Duc Nguyen & Atsushi Aoyama, 2014. "Impact of Corporate Culture on the Relationship between Efficient Technology Transfer and Business Performance," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(4), pages 637-661, December.
    3. John R. Turner & Rose Baker, 2017. "Team Emergence Leadership Development and Evaluation: A Theoretical Model Using Complexity Theory," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Menike Atapattu & Gayani Ranawake, 2017. "Transformational and Transactional Leadership Behaviours and their Effect on Knowledge Workers' Propensity for Knowledge Management Processes," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(03), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Yanica Dimitrova, 2018. "The Culture of Innovation Model," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 39-68.
    6. Arif Hartono & Ratih Kusumawardhani, 2019. "Innovation Barriers and Their Impact on Innovation: Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing Firms," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(5), pages 1196-1213, October.
    7. Jose M Barrutia & Carmen Echebarria & Ainhize Gilsanz, 2011. "Social capital and innovation: an empirical analysis in the context of European regions," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1347, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Vandana Tamta & M. K. Rao, 2017. "Linking Emotional Intelligence to Knowledge Sharing Behaviour: Organizational Justice and Work Engagement as Mediators," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(6), pages 1580-1596, December.
    9. Ashutosh Shukla & Sunil Kumar Pandey & Ashish M. Dubey, 2020. "Determinants of Organizational Learning in a Firm: An Empirical Analysis of Indian IT Industry," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(4), pages 1051-1064, August.
    10. Evans Sokro & Soma Pillay, 2020. "Host Country Nationals’ Attitudes, Social Support and Willingness to Work with Expatriates," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(5), pages 1184-1199, October.
    11. Richa Chaudhary, 2014. "Occupational Self Efficacy Expectations among Indian Executives: Examining the Psychometric Properties of Occupational Self Efficacy Scale (OSES)," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(1), pages 47-58, March.
    12. Meeta Dasgupta, 2015. "Exploring the Relevance of Case Study Research," Vision, , vol. 19(2), pages 147-160, June.
    13. de Paulo, Alex Fabianne & Porto, Geciane Silveira, 2017. "Solar energy technologies and open innovation: A study based on bibliometric and social network analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 228-238.
    14. Pooja K. Singh & M. K. Rao, 2017. "HR Practices, Learning Culture and Human Capital: A Study on Indian Business and Professional Service Sector," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(3), pages 678-690, June.
    15. Rahul Raj & Kailash B.L. Srivastava, 2013. "The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning on the Relationship among Organizational Culture, HRM Practices and Innovativeness," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 38(3), pages 201-223, August.
    16. Hemlata Gangwar & Hema Date & R. Ramaswamy, 2015. "Developing a Cloud-Computing Adoption Framework," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(4), pages 632-651, August.
    17. Paola Castellani & Chiara Rossato & Elena Giaretta & Raffaela Davide, 2021. "Tacit knowledge sharing in knowledge-intensive firms: the perceptions of team members and team leaders," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 125-155, January.
    18. Hardeep Chahal & Jeevan Jyoti & Asha Rani, 2016. "The Effect of Perceived High-performance Human Resource Practices on Business Performance: Role of Organizational Learning," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(3_suppl), pages 107-132, June.
    19. Scuotto, Veronica & Del Giudice, Manlio & Peruta, Maria Rosaria della & Tarba, Shlomo, 2017. "The performance implications of leveraging internal innovation through social media networks: An empirical verification of the smart fashion industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 184-194.
    20. Darshna V. Banker & Kanika T. Bhal, 2020. "Understanding Compassion from Practicing Managers’ Perspective: Vicious and Virtuous Forces in Business Organizations," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(1), pages 262-278, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:18:y:2017:i:2:p:291-307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.