IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v15y2014i1p47-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupational Self Efficacy Expectations among Indian Executives: Examining the Psychometric Properties of Occupational Self Efficacy Scale (OSES)

Author

Listed:
  • Richa Chaudhary

    (Richa Chaudhary, Research Scholar, Department of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India. E-mail: richa.chaudhary18@gmail.com)

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties of scores from occupational self efficacy scale (OSES) by Pethe et al. ( 1999 ). Data were obtained from Indian business executives, a population previously untested with OSES. Three interpretable factors were extracted as a result of exploratory factor analysis instead of six-factor structure proposed by the authors of the scale. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results provided support for superiority of three-factor model over alternative models. All the three factors were found to be internally consistent. Results indicated that Pethe et al.’s scale, with minor modification, showed promise for self-efficacy research.

Suggested Citation

  • Richa Chaudhary, 2014. "Occupational Self Efficacy Expectations among Indian Executives: Examining the Psychometric Properties of Occupational Self Efficacy Scale (OSES)," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(1), pages 47-58, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:15:y:2014:i:1:p:47-58
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150913515603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150913515603
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150913515603?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meeta Dasgupta & A. Sahay & R. K. Gupta, 2009. "The Role of Knowledge Management in Innovation," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(04), pages 317-330.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alok Kumar Singh & Jyoti Verma & Rajeev Verma, 2020. "Understanding Role of Market-orientated IT Competence and Knowledge Sharing Mechanism in Gaining Competitive Advantage," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(2), pages 418-435, April.
    2. Nguyen Thi Duc Nguyen & Atsushi Aoyama, 2014. "Impact of Corporate Culture on the Relationship between Efficient Technology Transfer and Business Performance," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(4), pages 637-661, December.
    3. John R. Turner & Rose Baker, 2017. "Team Emergence Leadership Development and Evaluation: A Theoretical Model Using Complexity Theory," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Menike Atapattu & Gayani Ranawake, 2017. "Transformational and Transactional Leadership Behaviours and their Effect on Knowledge Workers' Propensity for Knowledge Management Processes," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(03), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Yanica Dimitrova, 2018. "The Culture of Innovation Model," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 39-68.
    6. Arif Hartono & Ratih Kusumawardhani, 2019. "Innovation Barriers and Their Impact on Innovation: Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing Firms," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(5), pages 1196-1213, October.
    7. Jose M Barrutia & Carmen Echebarria & Ainhize Gilsanz, 2011. "Social capital and innovation: an empirical analysis in the context of European regions," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1347, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Vandana Tamta & M. K. Rao, 2017. "Linking Emotional Intelligence to Knowledge Sharing Behaviour: Organizational Justice and Work Engagement as Mediators," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(6), pages 1580-1596, December.
    9. Ashutosh Shukla & Sunil Kumar Pandey & Ashish M. Dubey, 2020. "Determinants of Organizational Learning in a Firm: An Empirical Analysis of Indian IT Industry," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(4), pages 1051-1064, August.
    10. Evans Sokro & Soma Pillay, 2020. "Host Country Nationals’ Attitudes, Social Support and Willingness to Work with Expatriates," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(5), pages 1184-1199, October.
    11. Meeta Dasgupta, 2015. "Exploring the Relevance of Case Study Research," Vision, , vol. 19(2), pages 147-160, June.
    12. Pooja K. Singh & M. K. Rao, 2017. "HR Practices, Learning Culture and Human Capital: A Study on Indian Business and Professional Service Sector," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(3), pages 678-690, June.
    13. Rahul Raj & Kailash B.L. Srivastava, 2013. "The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning on the Relationship among Organizational Culture, HRM Practices and Innovativeness," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 38(3), pages 201-223, August.
    14. Hemlata Gangwar & Hema Date & R. Ramaswamy, 2015. "Developing a Cloud-Computing Adoption Framework," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(4), pages 632-651, August.
    15. Paola Castellani & Chiara Rossato & Elena Giaretta & Raffaela Davide, 2021. "Tacit knowledge sharing in knowledge-intensive firms: the perceptions of team members and team leaders," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 125-155, January.
    16. Hardeep Chahal & Jeevan Jyoti & Asha Rani, 2016. "The Effect of Perceived High-performance Human Resource Practices on Business Performance: Role of Organizational Learning," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(3_suppl), pages 107-132, June.
    17. Alex Fabianne de Paulo & Luísa Cagica Carvalho & Maria Teresa G.V. Costa & Jose Eduardo F. Lopes & Simone V.R. Galina, 2017. "Mapping Open Innovation: A Bibliometric Review to Compare Developed and Emerging Countries," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(2), pages 291-307, April.
    18. Scuotto, Veronica & Del Giudice, Manlio & Peruta, Maria Rosaria della & Tarba, Shlomo, 2017. "The performance implications of leveraging internal innovation through social media networks: An empirical verification of the smart fashion industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 184-194.
    19. Darshna V. Banker & Kanika T. Bhal, 2020. "Understanding Compassion from Practicing Managers’ Perspective: Vicious and Virtuous Forces in Business Organizations," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(1), pages 262-278, February.
    20. Seyedeh Khadijeh Taghizadeh & Syed Abidur Rahman & Hasliza Abdul Halim & Noor Hazlina Ahmad, 2017. "Dwelling into Service Innovation Management Practices: A Comparison Between Telecommunication Industry in Malaysia and Bangladesh," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(1), pages 87-98, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:15:y:2014:i:1:p:47-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.