IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v38y2020i7-8p1348-1366.html

Waste and postsocialism in Estonia: Becoming European through the management of rubbish

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Martínez

    (Helsingin Yliopisto, Finland; University of Leicester, UK)

  • Kaia Beilmann

Abstract

This article explores notions of postsocialism and waste in relation to each other. The research approaches waste as a means of considering changing orders of knowledge, scripts and standards, which in our view is a key element of postsocialist societies. The research offers important information in relation to the ways in which waste practices have changed (or not) in accordance to EU regulations and standards in Estonia, and provides significant data to highlight the emergence of controversies and negotiations around this issue across different scales. It therefore aims to make an important contribution to future cross-cultural comparisons of the political implications of rubbish management; also to ongoing discussions about processes of Europeanization and how transnational socio-technical arrangements are assembled with local practices. After examining waste politics in Estonia, the article concludes that for this country, postsocialist transformations implied a break in orders of knowledge, as part of an intensive social negotiation within the framework of the EU. Nonetheless, it also foregrounds that waste practices show relevant continuities and complex scale effects in the new chain of connections and legislation.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Martínez & Kaia Beilmann, 2020. "Waste and postsocialism in Estonia: Becoming European through the management of rubbish," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(7-8), pages 1348-1366, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:38:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1348-1366
    DOI: 10.1177/2399654420925083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399654420925083
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399654420925083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N/A, 2010. "The UK economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 213(1), pages 3-3, July.
    2. Tauri Tuvikene, 2016. "Strategies for Comparative Urbanism: Post-socialism as a De-territorialized Concept," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 132-146, January.
    3. Garri Raagmaa & Tarmo Kalvet & Ragne Kasesalu, 2014. "Europeanization and De-Europeanization of Estonian Regional Policy," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 775-795, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brahmanand Mohanty & Martin Scherfler & Vikram Devatha, 2012. "Lifestyle Choices and Societal Behavior Changes as Local Climate Strategy," ADBI Working Papers 398, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    2. Urhammer, Emil & Røpke, Inge, 2013. "Macroeconomic narratives in a world of crises: An analysis of stories about solving the system crisis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 62-70.
    3. Thierry Madiès & Grégoire Rota-Grasiozi & Jean-Pierre Tranchant & Cyril Trépier, 2018. "The economics of secession: a review of legal, theoretical, and empirical aspects," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 154(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Andy Pike & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & John Tomaney & Gianpiero Torrisi & Vassilis Tselios, 2010. "In Search of the 'Economic Dividend' of Devolution: Spatial Disparities, Spatial Economic Policy and Decentralisation in the UK," SERC Discussion Papers 0062, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    5. Guido Sechi & Dmitrii Zhitin & Zaiga Krisjane & Maris Berzins, 2022. "Post-Soviet Suburbanization as Part of Broader Metropolitan Change: A Comparative Analysis of Saint Petersburg and Riga," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Simone Marsiglio, 2010. "Endogenous Growth, Population Growth and the Repugnant Conclusion," UNIMI - Research Papers in Economics, Business, and Statistics unimi-1103, Universitá degli Studi di Milano.
    7. Andy Pike & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & John Tomaney & Gianpiero Torrisi & Vassilis Tselios, 2012. "In Search of the ‘Economic Dividend’ of Devolution: Spatial Disparities, Spatial Economic Policy, and Decentralisation in the UK," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(1), pages 10-28, February.
    8. Bosello, Francesco & Davide, Marinella & Alloisio, Isabella, "undated". "Economic Implications of EU Mitigation Policies: Domestic and International Effects," EIA: Climate Change: Economic Impacts and Adaptation 234938, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    9. Kate Bayliss & Ben Fine & Mary Robertson, 2013. "From Financialisation to Consumption: The Systems of Provision Approach Applied to Housing and Water," Working papers wpaper02, Financialisation, Economy, Society & Sustainable Development (FESSUD) Project.
    10. La Torre, Davide & Marsiglio, Simone, 2010. "Endogenous technological progress in a multi-sector growth model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 1017-1028, September.
    11. Rowena Crawford & Andrew Hood, 2015. "A tale of three distributions: inheritances, wealth and lifetime income," IFS Working Papers W15/14, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    12. Diallo Mamadou Saliou Kokouma & Kaning Xu, 2013. "Attracting Chinese Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) to Africa: Determinants and Policies - The Case of Guinea," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(4), pages 52-71, October.
    13. Joya A. Kemper & C. Michael Hall & Paul W. Ballantine, 2019. "Marketing and Sustainability: Business as Usual or Changing Worldviews?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Luca, Davide, 2014. "Electoral politics and regional development: assessing the geographical allocation of public investment in Turkey," CEPR Discussion Papers 10043, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Somorin, Tosin Onabanjo & Kolios, Athanasios J., 2017. "Prospects of deployment of Jatropha biodiesel-fired plants in Nigeria’s power sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 726-739.
    16. Cecilia Pasquinelli & Mariapina Trunfio & Nicola Bellini & Simona Rossi, 2021. "Sustainability in Overtouristified Cities? A Social Media Insight into Italian Branding Responses to Covid-19 Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    17. Byron Miller & Kevin Ward & Ryan Burns & Victoria Fast & Anthony Levenda, 2021. "Worlding and provincialising smart cities: From individual case studies to a global comparative research agenda," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 655-673, February.
    18. Bernt, Matthias & Holm, Andrej, 2020. "Den Osten im Blick: Eine Replik," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 8(3), pages 151-156.
    19. Visintin Stefano & Maroto Andres & Di Meglio Gisela & Rubalcaba Luis, 2010. "The Role of Cost Related Factors in the Competitiveness of European Services," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, October.
    20. Fiorenza Carraro & Andrea Zatti, 2012. "Decentralized environmental taxation: a preliminary assessment," Chapters, in: Larry Kreiser & Ana Yábar Sterling & Pedro Herrera & Janet E. Milne & Hope Ashiabor (ed.), Carbon Pricing, Growth and the Environment, chapter 3, pages 33-49, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:38:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1348-1366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.