IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v19y2001i2p269-288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rescaling and Regional Governance: The English Regional Development Agencies and the Environment

Author

Listed:
  • David Gibbs
  • Andrew E G Jonas

Abstract

The establishment of Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) in the English regions will bring about an important change in UK regional governance. A key area of contention and struggle is likely to occur over the contribution of the RDAs to sustainable development. Although the pursuit of sustainable development is a stated goal of the RDAs, in this paper we argue that this goal is likely to be compromised by tensions and contradictions emerging in the evolving new governance landscape of England. In terms of promoting sustainable-development policy, the regional scale of the UK state is becoming materially and discursively significant, and a particular focus of struggles around economic and environmental issues. These struggles strategically intersect with wider processes of reregulation and rescaling in the UK state. We not only consider the practical policy implications of integrating the economy and environment at the regional scale, but also analyse emerging tensions in regional governance in the light of processes of social reregulation and rescaling within the UK state. We argue that theoretical approaches to the latter need to incorporate the uneven process of rescaling and the contingent nature of regional state forms and institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • David Gibbs & Andrew E G Jonas, 2001. "Rescaling and Regional Governance: The English Regional Development Agencies and the Environment," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 19(2), pages 269-288, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:19:y:2001:i:2:p:269-288
    DOI: 10.1068/c9908j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c9908j
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c9908j?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cynthia Horan & Andrew E. G. Jonas, 1998. "Governing Massachusetts: Uneven Development and Politics in Metropolitan Boston," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(0), pages 83-95, March.
    2. Tony Jackson & Peter Roberts, 1997. "Greening the Fife Economy: Ecological Modernization as a Pathway for Local Economic Development," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 615-630.
    3. D. Gibbs, 1998. "Regional development agencies and sustainable development," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 365-368.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalia Restrepo & Salvador Anton Clavé, 2019. "Institutional Thickness and Regional Tourism Development: Lessons from Antioquia, Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-25, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Jin-Li & Wang, Shih-Chuan & Yeh, Fang-Yu, 2006. "Total-factor water efficiency of regions in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 217-230, December.
    2. Tony Jackson & Jennifer Dixon, 2007. "The New Zealand Resource Management Act: An Exercise in Delivering Sustainable Development through an Ecological Modernisation Agenda," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 34(1), pages 107-120, February.
    3. Davide Luca, 2022. "National elections, sub-national growth: the politics of Turkey’s provincial economic dynamics under AKP rule [Shift-share designs: theory and inference]," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(4), pages 829-851.
    4. Aidan While & Andrew E G Jonas & David C Gibbs, 2004. "Unblocking the City? Growth Pressures, Collective Provision, and the Search for New Spaces of Governance in Greater Cambridge, England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(2), pages 279-304, February.
    5. M Baker & I Deas & C Wong, 1999. "Obscure Ritual or Administrative Luxury? Integrating Strategic Planning and Regional Development," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 26(5), pages 763-782, October.
    6. Krutilla Kerry & Alexeev Alexander, 2012. "The Normative Implications of Political Decision-Making for Benefit-Cost Analysis," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 1-36, May.
    7. Lynn Mainwaring & Richard Jones & David Blackaby, 2006. "Devolution, sustainability and GDP convergence: Is the Welsh agenda achievable?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 679-689.
    8. Wen-Min Lu & Shih-Fang Lo, 2012. "Constructing stratifications for regions in China with sustainable development concerns," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1807-1823, October.
    9. Richard Cowell & Susan Owens, 2006. "Governing Space: Planning Reform and the Politics of Sustainability," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(3), pages 403-421, June.
    10. Hu, Jin-Li & Wang, Shih-Chuan, 2006. "Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(17), pages 3206-3217, November.
    11. Shih-Heng Yu, 2019. "Benchmarking and Performance Evaluation Towards the Sustainable Development of Regions in Taiwan: A Minimum Distance-Based Measure with Undesirable Outputs in Additive DEA," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(3), pages 1323-1348, August.
    12. Darren Webb & Clive Collis, 2000. "Regional Development Agencies and the 'New Regionalism' in England," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9), pages 857-864.
    13. Paul Chatterton & David Bradley, 2000. "Bringing Britain Together?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 15(2), pages 98-111, July.
    14. Mark Jayne & Philip Hubbard & David Bell, 2013. "Twin Cities: Territorial and Relational Geographies of ‘Worldly’ Manchester," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(2), pages 239-254, February.
    15. W-M Lu & S-F Lo, 2007. "A benchmark-learning roadmap for regional sustainable development in China," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(7), pages 841-849, July.
    16. Tony Jackson, 2007. "Mainstreaming Sustainability in Local Economic Development Practice," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 22(1), pages 12-26, February.
    17. Shih-Heng Yu & Yu Gao & Yih-Chearng Shiue, 2017. "A Comprehensive Evaluation of Sustainable Development Ability and Pathway for Major Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    18. Paul Chatterton, 2002. "'Be Realistic: Demand the Impossible'. Moving Towards 'Strong' Sustainable Development in an Old Industrial Region?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 552-561.
    19. Kevin Ward & Andrew E G Jonas, 2004. "Competitive City-Regionalism as a Politics of Space: A Critical Reinterpretation of the New Regionalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(12), pages 2119-2139, December.
    20. Paul Benneworth & Peter Roberts, 2002. "Devolution, Sustainability and Local Economic Development: Impacts on Local Autonomy, Policymaking and Economic Development Outcomes," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 17(3), pages 239-252, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:19:y:2001:i:2:p:269-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.