IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v17y2002i3p239-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Devolution, Sustainability and Local Economic Development: Impacts on Local Autonomy, Policymaking and Economic Development Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Benneworth

    (Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 7RU)

  • Peter Roberts

    (Professor of European Strategic Planning, Geddes Centre for Planning Research, University of Dundee, DD1 4HN, Scotland)

Abstract

In this paper, we examine how devolution has affected local sustainable development. We focus on attempting to gauge how devolution will affect the promotion of sustainable development in the English regions through an analysis of the changes to date in Scotland, Wales and London. This evaluation is made more difficult because of the range of changes which devolution involves - political, institutional, organizational and cultural, and it is hard to ascribe particular outcomes to particular changes. The focus of the paper is examining how local sustainability regimes have been affected by devolution in the three case study regions. We then conclude that devolution can only add value to existing arrangements if it creates an additional level of legitimacy which supports local coalitions deepening their commitment to the principles of local sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Benneworth & Peter Roberts, 2002. "Devolution, Sustainability and Local Economic Development: Impacts on Local Autonomy, Policymaking and Economic Development Outcomes," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 17(3), pages 239-252, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:17:y:2002:i:3:p:239-252
    DOI: 10.1080/02690940210152540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/02690940210152540
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02690940210152540?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simonis, Udo E., 1993. "Industrial restructuring: does it have to be "jobs vs. trees"?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 1-6.
    2. Mark Tewdwr-Jones & Nicholas Phelps, 2000. "Levelling the Uneven Playing Field: Inward Investment, Interregional Rivalry and the Planning System," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 429-440.
    3. Tony Jackson & Peter Roberts, 1997. "Greening the Fife Economy: Ecological Modernization as a Pathway for Local Economic Development," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 615-630.
    4. Richard Hales, 2000. "Land Use Development Planning and the Notion of Sustainable Development: Exploring Constraint and Facilitation within the English Planning System," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 99-121.
    5. Paul Benneworth & Leanne Conroy & Peter Roberts, 2002. "Strategic Connectivity, Sustainable Development and the New English Regional Governance," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 199-217.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sue Kidd & Thomas B Fischer, 2007. "Towards Sustainability: Is Integrated Appraisal a Step in the Right Direction?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(2), pages 233-249, April.
    2. Tony Jackson & Jennifer Dixon, 2007. "The New Zealand Resource Management Act: An Exercise in Delivering Sustainable Development through an Ecological Modernisation Agenda," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 34(1), pages 107-120, February.
    3. Simona Iammarino, 2018. "FDI and regional development policy," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(3), pages 157-183, December.
    4. Tian Yang & Jinsong Liu & Qianwei Ying & Tahir Yousaf, 2019. "Media Coverage and Sustainable Stock Returns: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Jifei Zhang & Chunyan Liu & Fei Chang, 2019. "A New Approach for Multifunctional Zoning of Territorial Space: The Panxi Area of the Upper Yangtze River in China Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Peter Loukopoulos & Roland W Scholz, 2004. "Sustainable Future Urban Mobility: Using ‘Area Development Negotiations’ for Scenario Assessment and Participatory Strategic Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(12), pages 2203-2226, December.
    7. David Gibbs & Andrew E G Jonas, 2001. "Rescaling and Regional Governance: The English Regional Development Agencies and the Environment," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 19(2), pages 269-288, April.
    8. Edward J Malecki, 2007. "Cities and Regions Competing in the Global Economy: Knowledge and Local Development Policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(5), pages 638-654, October.
    9. Peter Roberts & Tony Jackson, 2002. "Sustainable development and the management of the Scottish environment: stringing the beads," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(3), pages 179-186.
    10. Iain Begg, 2002. "'Investability': The Key to Competitive Regions and Cities?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 187-193.
    11. Shameen Prashantham & Sumelika Bhattacharyya, 2020. "MNE–SME co-innovation in peripheral regions," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(2), pages 134-153, June.
    12. David Counsell & Graham Haughton, 2003. "Regional Planning Tensions: Planning for Economic Growth and Sustainable Development in Two Contrasting English Regions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 21(2), pages 225-239, April.
    13. Fennie M van Straalen & Leonie B Janssen-Jansen & Adri van den Brink, 2014. "Delivering Planning Objectives through Regional-Based Land-Use Planning and Land Policy Instruments: An Assessment of Recent Experiences in the Dutch Provinces," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(3), pages 567-584, June.
    14. Mia Gray & Anna Barford, 2018. "The depths of the cuts: the uneven geography of local government austerity," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(3), pages 541-563.
    15. Nicholas A. Phelps & Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 2001. "Globalisation, Regions and the State: Exploring the Limitations of Economic Modernisation through Inward Investment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(8), pages 1253-1272, July.
    16. Nicholas A. Phelps & Andrew Wood, 2018. "Promoting the global economy: The uneven development of the location consulting industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(6), pages 1336-1354, September.
    17. Sungjo Hong & Ihl Kweon & Bum-Hyun Lee & Heechul Kim, 2019. "Indicators and Assessment System for Sustainability of Municipalities: A Case Study of South Korea’s Assessment of Sustainability of Cities (ASC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, November.
    18. Danson, Michael & Todeva, Emanuela, 2016. "Government and Governance of Regional Triple Helix Interactions," MPRA Paper 76780, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Toni Darbas, 2008. "Reflexive Governance of Urban Catchments: A Case of Deliberative Truncation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(6), pages 1454-1469, June.
    20. Andrew Crawley & Max Munday & Rick Delbridge, 2020. "Selling The Region: The Problems of a Multi‐Agency Approach in Promoting Regional Economies," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 397-412, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:17:y:2002:i:3:p:239-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.