Author
Listed:
- Shuli Luo
- Sylvia Y. He
- Linqi Song
- Sisi Jian
- Yepeng Yao
Abstract
Public transit systems are essential to urban mobility, serving millions of daily commuters. To develop a more responsive, equitable, and efficient public transportation system, it is crucial for transportation planners and policymakers to gain a comprehensive understanding of the diverse travel experiences of transit users. Social media platforms offer valuable, continuous feedback, enabling transit providers to identify issues, make real-time adjustments, and plan long-term improvements. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have attracted significant attention in the urban planning field due to their exceptional performance in natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Using a Weibo dataset related to the Shenzhen metro system (2018–2019) in China, this study developed a two-stage analysis framework to evaluate LLMs’ capabilities in transit service management acting as customer experience analyst and transport planner respectively. We employed LLMs including GPT-3.5 and GPT-4o, utilizing zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought prompting techniques. Our findings demonstrate that LLMs consistently excel in the classification task and the policy recommendation task when benchmarked against the traditional Bag of Words (BOW) model. The systematic error analysis revealed three types of hallucinations: overthinking, contextual reasoning error, and ambiguity error. Despite these challenges, this research underscores the potential of LLMs in enhancing transit service quality assessment and emphasizes the importance of domain-specific expert rationale in designing prompts and interpreting results. Our study provides valuable insights for transportation planners aiming to leverage advanced NLP techniques for more responsive and data-driven service improvements.
Suggested Citation
Shuli Luo & Sylvia Y. He & Linqi Song & Sisi Jian & Yepeng Yao, 2026.
"Exploring the potential of large language models (LLMs) in analyzing passengers’ perceptions of transit service quality,"
Environment and Planning B, , vol. 53(1), pages 90-106, January.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:envirb:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:90-106
DOI: 10.1177/23998083251382840
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:53:y:2026:i:1:p:90-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.