IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v51y2024i6p1290-1307.html

Where is it complex to reallocate road space?

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Valença
  • Filipe Moura
  • Ana Morais de Sá

Abstract

Road space distribution has traditionally been based on the hierarchical classification of streets. In arterials, the majority of space is dedicated to traffic lanes, whereas local streets typically have fewer traffic lanes and more space for parking or sidewalks. Within urban areas, road space is contested between two main types of spaces: corridors of movement, and places for access and standing/stillness/staying. Given the limited availability of urban space, particularly in central areas, deciding how to allocate space for these functions poses a dilemma and requires tradeoffs. Nonetheless, certain areas experience underutilization and inefficiencies in space utilization over time. In this context, we propose a site selection methodology to identify complex zones within a city where different types of users and demands compete for space. These zones present the potential for dynamically allocating road space based on fluctuating demands and policy objectives. This methodology serves as an initial guide for planners to identify zones that require a thorough evaluation of activities and diverse temporal-spatial demands when reallocating road space. We use network centrality, land use indicators, traffic, and public transport dynamics indicators to detect complex zones and apply them to a Lisbon case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Valença & Filipe Moura & Ana Morais de Sá, 2024. "Where is it complex to reallocate road space?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(6), pages 1290-1307, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:6:p:1290-1307
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083231217770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083231217770
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083231217770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cervero, Robert, 1996. "Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American Housing Survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 361-377, September.
    2. Wang, Fahui & Antipova, Anzhelika & Porta, Sergio, 2011. "Street centrality and land use intensity in Baton Rouge, Louisiana," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 285-293.
    3. Samuel Nello-Deakin, 2019. "Is there such a thing as a ‘fair’ distribution of road space?," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 698-714, September.
    4. De Gruyter, Chris & Zahraee, Seyed Mojib & Young, William, 2022. "Understanding the allocation and use of street space in areas of high people activity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Eric J. Miller, 2018. "Accessibility: measurement and application in transportation planning," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 551-555, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Gruyter, Chris & Davies, Liam & Li, Xiao & Jafari, Afshin & Yacoubian, Alexia & Amati, Marco, 2025. "Measuring use of the street space in central city areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    2. Rayaprolu, Hema & Levinson, David, 2024. "Co-evolution of public transport access and ridership," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Jung Hyun Woo, 2021. "Classification of TOD Typologies Based on Pedestrian Behavior for Sustainable and Active Urban Growth in Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Li, Jingjing & Kim, Changjoo & Sang, Sunhee, 2018. "Exploring impacts of land use characteristics in residential neighborhood and activity space on non-work travel behaviors," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 141-147.
    5. Clarke, Philippa & Ailshire, Jennifer A. & Lantz, Paula, 2009. "Urban built environments and trajectories of mobility disability: Findings from a national sample of community-dwelling American adults (1986-2001)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 964-970, September.
    6. Jean Ryan, 2020. "Examining the Process of Modal Choice for Everyday Travel Among Older People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Romanika Okraszewska & Aleksandra Romanowska & Marcin Wołek & Jacek Oskarbski & Krystian Birr & Kazimierz Jamroz, 2018. "Integration of a Multilevel Transport System Model into Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Zhong Zheng & Suhong Zhou & Xingdong Deng, 2022. "The spatially heterogeneous and double-edged effect of the built environment on commuting distance: Home-based and work-based perspectives," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-24, March.
    9. Guanwen Yin & Tianzi Liu & Yanbin Chen & Yiming Hou, 2022. "Disparity and Spatial Heterogeneity of the Correlation between Street Centrality and Land Use Intensity in Jinan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-23, November.
    10. Kyung Hwan Lee & Eun Jeong Ko, 2014. "Relationships between neighbourhood environments and residents' bicycle mode choice: a case study of Seoul," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 383-395, November.
    11. Souche, Stéphanie, 2009. "Un exemple d’estimation de la demande de transport urbain," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Editions NecPlus, vol. 2009(04), pages 759-779, December.
    12. Tu Anh Trinh & Ducksu Seo & Unchong Kim & Thi Nhu Quynh Phan & Thi Hai Hang Nguyen, 2022. "Air Transport Centrality as a Driver of Sustainable Regional Growth: A Case of Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    13. Scoppa, Martin & Bawazir, Khawla & Alawadi, Khaled, 2019. "Straddling boundaries in superblock cities. Assessing local and global network connectivity using cases from Abu Dhabi, UAE," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 770-782.
    14. Shasha Liu & Toshiyuki Yamamoto & Enjian Yao, 2023. "Joint modeling of mode choice and travel distance with intra-household interactions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1527-1552, October.
    15. Shih-Lung Shaw, 2023. "Time geography in a hybrid physical–virtual world," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 339-356, July.
    16. Chen, Cynthia & Mokhtarian, Patricia, 2008. "A Review and Discussion of the Literature on Travel Time and Money Expenditures," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt51d696jh, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    17. Chang-Deok Kang, 2019. "Effects of spatial access to neighborhood land-use density on housing prices: Evidence from a multilevel hedonic analysis in Seoul, South Korea," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(4), pages 603-625, May.
    18. Ahmed Ali Bindajam & Javed Mallick, 2020. "Impact of the Spatial Configuration of Streets Networks on Urban Growth: A Case Study of Abha City, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Enayat Mirzaei & Dominique Mignot, 2021. "An Empirical Analysis of Mode Choice Decision for Utilitarian and Hedonic Trips: Evidence from Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.
    20. Javier Asensio, 2002. "Transport Mode Choice by Commuters to Barcelona's CBD," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(10), pages 1881-1895, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:6:p:1290-1307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.