IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v49y2022i8p2250-2266.html

Where the Crosswalk Ends: Mapping Crosswalk Coverage via Satellite Imagery in San Francisco

Author

Listed:
  • Marcel E. Moran

Abstract

Marked crosswalks are the primary means of safeguarding pedestrian travel at intersections in American cities. In the face of decades-high pedestrian fatalities nationwide, the provision of adequate crosswalks is highly salient. Though, how they are spatially distributed across an entire city, and vary by neighborhood, has drawn little academic scrutiny. Given that, this study utilizes satellite imagery to map the presence of marked crosswalks throughout San Francisco, a dense, walkable city that has struggled to reach its pedestrian-safety goals. For the first time, this allows for a calculation of “crosswalk coverage†for the city as a whole. Manual review of satellite imagery documents that crosswalks are present at 58% of San Francisco’s roughly 6,400 intersections, though they are not evenly distributed across neighborhoods. Both hotspot analysis and comparing crosswalk coverage by Census tracts demonstrates that northern neighborhoods—even outside of the downtown core—maintain higher percentages of intersections with crosswalks than those in the southern half. Intersections exhibit crosswalk “corridor effects,†in that crosswalks often cluster along certain streets, including (but not limited to) commercial areas. In addition, crosswalks in four neighborhoods were analyzed to a deeper extent, including category (e.g., ladder, continental, and standard), condition, and “completeness†or the number of adjacent blocks with a connecting crosswalk. Across these roughly 1,000 intersections, coverage varied from 51% in the Bayview (a historic African American community) to 83% in Pacific Heights (a high-income, majority-white neighborhood). Though these patterns track somewhat with local pedestrian and automobile volumes, crosswalk coverage diverges from these data in many ways, indicating other factors at play in their distribution. Overall, satellite imagery can be used to identify marked crosswalks at scale, evaluate their quality, and probe geographic variation. Armed with such granular data, planners can consider the ways in which crosswalks are present throughout cities—and where notable gaps exist—in their pursuit of Vision Zero goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcel E. Moran, 2022. "Where the Crosswalk Ends: Mapping Crosswalk Coverage via Satellite Imagery in San Francisco," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(8), pages 2250-2266, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:49:y:2022:i:8:p:2250-2266
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083221081530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083221081530
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083221081530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schneider, Robert J. & Henry, Todd & Mitman, Meghan F. & Stonehill, Laura & Koehler, Jesse, 2013. "Development and Application of the San Francisco Pedestrian Intersection Volume Model," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8cs2g40c, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Grisé, Emily & Buliung, Ron & Rothman, Linda & Howard, Andrew, 2018. "A geography of child and elderly pedestrian injury in the City of Toronto, Canada," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 321-329.
    3. Welch, Timothy F., 2013. "Equity in transport: The distribution of transit access and connectivity among affordable housing units," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 283-293.
    4. Jennifer Pharr & Courtney Coughenour & Timothy Bungum, 2013. "Environmental, Human and Socioeconomic Characteristics of Pedestrian Injury and Death in Las Vegas, NC," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 2(10), pages 31-39, October.
    5. Ewing, R. & Schieber, R.A. & Zegeer, C.V., 2003. "Urban Sprawl as a Risk Factor in Motor Vehicle Occupant and Pedestrian Fatalities," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(9), pages 1541-1545.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meiqing Li & Hao Sheng & Jeremy Irvin & Heejung Chung & Andrew Ying & Tiger Sun & Andrew Y Ng & Daniel A Rodriguez, 2023. "Marked crosswalks in US transit-oriented station areas, 2007–2020: A computer vision approach using street view imagery," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(2), pages 350-369, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moran, Marcel E., 2022. "Where the Crosswalk Ends: Mapping Crosswalk Coverage via Satellite Imagery in San Francisco," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt67447864, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Anura Amarasinghe & Gerard D'Souza & Cheryl Brown & Tatiana Borisova, 2006. "A Spatial Analysis of Obesity in West Virginia," Working Papers Working Paper 2006-13, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
    3. Najaf, Pooya & Thill, Jean-Claude & Zhang, Wenjia & Fields, Milton Greg, 2018. "City-level urban form and traffic safety: A structural equation modeling analysis of direct and indirect effects," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 257-270.
    4. Grisé, Emily & Buliung, Ron & Rothman, Linda & Howard, Andrew, 2018. "A geography of child and elderly pedestrian injury in the City of Toronto, Canada," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 321-329.
    5. Kevin X. Li & Tae-Joon Park & Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Heather McLaughlin & Wenming Shi, 2018. "Container Transport Network for Sustainable Development in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Kelobonye, Keone & McCarney, Gary & Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia) & Swapan, Mohammad Shahidul Hasan & Mao, Feng & Zhou, Heng, 2019. "Relative accessibility analysis for key land uses: A spatial equity perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 82-93.
    7. Pasha, Obed & Wyczalkowski, Chris & Sohrabian, Dro & Lendel, Iryna, 2020. "Transit effects on poverty, employment, and rent in Cuyahoga County, Ohio," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 33-41.
    8. Courtney Coughenour & Hanns de la Fuente-Mella & Alexander Paz, 2019. "Analysis of Self-Reported Walking for Transit in a Sprawling Urban Metropolitan Area in the Western U.S," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, February.
    9. repec:rri:wpaper:200613 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Daniel Oviedo & Luis A. Guzman, 2020. "Revisiting Accessibility in a Context of Sustainable Transport: Capabilities and Inequalities in Bogotá," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Kangxu Wang & Weifeng Wang & Tongtong Li & Shengjun Wen & Xin Fu & Xinhao Wang, 2023. "Optimizing Living Service Amenities for Diverse Urban Residents: A Supply and Demand Balancing Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    12. Badland, Hannah & Pearce, Jamie, 2019. "Liveable for whom? Prospects of urban liveability to address health inequities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 94-105.
    13. Gabriella Vitorino Guimarães & Tálita Floriano Santos & Vicente Aprigliano Fernandes & Jorge Eliécer Córdoba Maquilón & Marcelino Aurélio Vieira da Silva, 2020. "Assessment for the Social Sustainability and Equity under the Perspective of Accessibility to Jobs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Badland, Hannah & Whitzman, Carolyn & Lowe, Melanie & Davern, Melanie & Aye, Lu & Butterworth, Iain & Hes, Dominique & Giles-Corti, Billie, 2014. "Urban liveability: Emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 64-73.
    15. Eda Ustaoglu & Brendan Williams & Laura O. Petrov & Harutyun Shahumyan & Hedwig Van Delden, 2017. "Developing and Assessing Alternative Land-Use Scenarios from the MOLAND Model: A Scenario-Based Impact Analysis Approach for the Evaluation of Rapid Rail Provisions and Urban Development in the Greater Dublin Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, December.
    16. Mariano Gallo & Mario Marinelli, 2020. "Sustainable Mobility: A Review of Possible Actions and Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-39, September.
    17. Xia, Jianhong(Cecilia) & Nesbitt, Joshua & Daley, Rebekah & Najnin, Arfanara & Litman, Todd & Tiwari, Surya Prasad, 2016. "A multi-dimensional view of transport-related social exclusion: A comparative study of Greater Perth and Sydney," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 205-221.
    18. Reid Ewing & Shima Hamidi & James B Grace, 2016. "Urban sprawl as a risk factor in motor vehicle crashes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(2), pages 247-266, February.
    19. Christopher Coyne & Abigail Hall & Patrick McLaughlin & Ann Zerkle, 2014. "A hidden cost of war: the impact of mobilizing reserve troops on emergency response times," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 289-303, December.
    20. Rubensson, Isak & Susilo, Yusak & Cats, Oded, 2020. "Fair accessibility – Operationalizing the distributional effects of policy interventions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    21. Boarnet, Marlon G & Bostic, Raphael & Williams, Danielle & Santiago-Bartolomei, Raul & Rodnyansky, Seva & Eisenlohr, Andy, 2017. "Affordable Housing in Transit-Oriented Developments: Impacts on Driving and Policy Approaches," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt487994z4, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:49:y:2022:i:8:p:2250-2266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.