IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v49y2022i2p411-426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visualizing the potential for transit-oriented development: Insights from an open and interactive planning support tool in Flanders, Belgium

Author

Listed:
  • Freke Caset
  • Filipe M Teixeira

Abstract

This paper reports on the development trajectory of an empirical tool for transit-oriented development planning in Flanders, Belgium. The tool, StationsRadar, draws on a branch of empirical railway station assessment tools that aim to support transit-oriented development planning processes by visualizing the performance of station locations for a range of transport (‘node’) and land use (‘place’) accessibility indicators. At the root of this paper lies the observation that, while the vast majority of reviewed studies highlight the relevance of the developed tools for planning practice, little work is undertaken to systematically verify that claim. Against this backdrop, we invoke an experiential research strategy as recently proposed in the field of planning research; we organize a series of experiential workshops in which we probe the tool’s added value for regional planning in Flanders. In the process, we specifically work towards a qualitative appraisal of tool ‘usability’ and discuss how our findings bear relevance to the well-rehearsed practice of developing empirical transit-oriented development support tools. Additionally, we elaborate on and illustrate the ramifications of our findings in terms of the subsequent/iterative technical revision of the tool. We conclude this paper by putting forward three major usability recommendations pertaining to: interactive and diversified data visualizations, actor-mobilizing momentum in light of data transparency, and the integration of ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ data in light of crowdsourcing aspirations. We reflect on the broader technical and methodological challenges that come with implementing these in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Freke Caset & Filipe M Teixeira, 2022. "Visualizing the potential for transit-oriented development: Insights from an open and interactive planning support tool in Flanders, Belgium," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 411-426, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:49:y:2022:i:2:p:411-426
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083211010793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083211010793
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083211010793?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reid Ewing & Robert Cervero, 2010. "Travel and the Built Environment," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 265-294.
    2. Ibraeva, Anna & Correia, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida & Silva, Cecília & Antunes, António Pais, 2020. "Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 110-130.
    3. Cecília Silva & Anders Larsson, 2018. "Challenges for Accessibility Planning and Research in the Context of Sustainable Mobility," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2018/07, OECD Publishing.
    4. Singh, Yamini Jain & Lukman, Azhari & Flacke, Johannes & Zuidgeest, Mark & Van Maarseveen, M.F.A.M., 2017. "Measuring TOD around transit nodes - Towards TOD policy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 96-111.
    5. Nigro, Antonio & Bertolini, Luca & Moccia, Francesco Domenico, 2019. "Land use and public transport integration in small cities and towns: Assessment methodology and application," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 110-124.
    6. Vale, David S. & Viana, Cláudia M. & Pereira, Mauro, 2018. "The extended node-place model at the local scale: Evaluating the integration of land use and transport for Lisbon's subway network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 282-293.
    7. Silva, Cecília & Bertolini, Luca & te Brömmelstroet, Marco & Milakis, Dimitris & Papa, Enrica, 2017. "Accessibility instruments in planning practice: Bridging the implementation gap," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 135-145.
    8. Freke Caset & David S. Vale & Cláudia M. Viana, 2018. "Measuring the Accessibility of Railway Stations in the Brussels Regional Express Network: a Node-Place Modeling Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 495-530, September.
    9. Freke Caset & David S. Vale & Cláudia M. Viana, 2018. "Correction to: Measuring the Accessibility of Railway Stations in the Brussels Regional Express Network: a Node-Place Modeling Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 531-531, September.
    10. Pelzer, Peter, 2017. "Usefulness of planning support systems: A conceptual framework and an empirical illustration," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 84-95.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lahoorpoor, Bahman & Levinson, David M., 2020. "Catchment if you can: The effect of station entrance and exit locations on accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Yingqun Zhang & Rui Song & Rob van Nes & Shiwei He & Weichuan Yin, 2019. "Identifying Urban Structure Based on Transit-Oriented Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Weustenenk, Anne Gerda & Mingardo, Giuliano, 2023. "Towards a typology of mobility hubs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    4. Su, Shiliang & Zhang, Hui & Wang, Miao & Weng, Min & Kang, Mengjun, 2021. "Transit-oriented development (TOD) typologies around metro station areas in urban China: A comparative analysis of five typical megacities for planning implications," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Bahman Lahoorpoor & David Levinson, 2020. "Lahoorpoor, Bahman and Levinson, D. (2020) Catchment if you can: The effect of station entrance and exit locations on accessibility," Working Papers 2022-01, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    6. Zhang, Yuerong & Marshall, Stephen & Manley, Ed, 2019. "Network criticality and the node-place-design model: Classifying metro station areas in Greater London," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Nigro, Antonio & Bertolini, Luca & Moccia, Francesco Domenico, 2019. "Land use and public transport integration in small cities and towns: Assessment methodology and application," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 110-124.
    8. Liao, Cong & Scheuer, Bronte, 2022. "Evaluating the performance of transit-oriented development in Beijing metro station areas: Integrating morphology and demand into the node-place model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    9. Pezeshknejad, Parsa & Monajem, Saeed & Mozafari, Hamid, 2020. "Evaluating sustainability and land use integration of BRT stations via extended node place model, an application on BRT stations of Tehran," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    10. Zhang, Yuerong & Marshall, Stephen & Manley, Ed, 2021. "Understanding the roles of rail stations: Insights from network approaches in the London metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    11. Pajares, Elias & Büttner, Benjamin & Jehle, Ulrike & Nichols, Aaron & Wulfhorst, Gebhard, 2021. "Accessibility by proximity: Addressing the lack of interactive accessibility instruments for active mobility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Robillard, Arianne & Boisjoly, Geneviève & van Lierop, Dea, 2024. "Transit-oriented development and bikeability: Classifying public transport station areas in Montreal, Canada," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 79-91.
    13. Zhao, Yingrui & Hu, Songhua & Zhang, Ming, 2024. "Evaluating equitable Transit-Oriented development (TOD) via the Node-Place-People model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    14. Lei, Xinyue & Chen, Junlan & Zhu, Zhenjun & Guo, Xiucheng & Liu, Pei & Jiang, Xiaohong, 2022. "How to locate urban–rural transit hubs from the viewpoint of county integration?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 606(C).
    15. Phani Kumar, P. & Ravi Sekhar, Ch. & Parida, Manoranjan, 2018. "Residential dissonance in TOD neighborhoods," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 166-177.
    16. Lei Pang & Yuxiao Jiang & Jingjing Wang & Ning Qiu & Xiang Xu & Lijian Ren & Xinyu Han, 2023. "Research of Metro Stations with Varying Patterns of Ridership and Their Relationship with Built Environment, on the Example of Tianjin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Ben Derudder & Zachary Neal, 2018. "Uncovering Links Between Urban Studies and Network Science," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 441-446, September.
    18. Li, Xijing & Zhang, Mengmeng & Wang, Jionghua, 2022. "The spatio-temporal relationship between land use and population distribution around new intercity railway stations: A case study on the Pearl River Delta region, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    19. Yat Yen & Pengjun Zhao & Muhammad T Sohail, 2021. "The morphology and circuity of walkable, bikeable, and drivable street networks in Phnom Penh, Cambodia," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(1), pages 169-185, January.
    20. Zheng, Lingwei & Austwick, Martin Zaltz, 2023. "Classifying station areas in greater Manchester using the node-place-design model: A comparative analysis with system centrality and green space coverage," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:49:y:2022:i:2:p:411-426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.