IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v43y2016i6p1096-1117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equitable distribution of open space: Using spatial analysis to evaluate urban parks in Curitiba, Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Joseli Macedo
  • Mônica A Haddad

Abstract

Urban parks are community assets, providing people places to play and rest. Access to parks in urban environments promotes social equity and improves quality of life for surrounding neighborhoods. In this context, social equity is related to accessibility, i.e. the possibility of walking or biking from home to a public park, giving people who do not have access to a variety of entertainment an option that is a public good. This paper examines the spatial distribution of urban parks in the city of Curitiba, Brazil, and how it relates to the socio-economic conditions of surrounding neighborhoods. Curitiba is known for its urban parks; however, no systematic study has been conducted to verify which neighborhoods enjoy park access within walking distance and what the socio-economic differences are between the better and worse served neighborhoods. In addition, we investigate if access to green open space has improved between the last two decennial census, a period marked by unprecedented socio-economic affluence in Brazil. Research questions, to be addressed using spatial analysis, focus on equitable distribution, and spatial evolution of parks and social equity. Variables include measurable walking distances from census tracts to parks, income data from the 2000 and 2010 Brazilian decennial censuses, and qualitative data of urban parks in Curitiba. Findings offer recommendations for future implementation of additional parks in Curitiba so that all areas of the city have adequate green open space and all citizens have equal access to recreation and leisure opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseli Macedo & Mônica A Haddad, 2016. "Equitable distribution of open space: Using spatial analysis to evaluate urban parks in Curitiba, Brazil," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(6), pages 1096-1117, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:43:y:2016:i:6:p:1096-1117
    DOI: 10.1177/0265813515603369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0265813515603369
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0265813515603369?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel Guillain & Julie Le Gallo & Celine Boiteux-Orain, 2006. "Changes in Spatial and Sectoral Patterns of Employment in Ile-de-France, 1978-97," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(11), pages 2075-2098, October.
    2. Jared Hewko & Karen E Smoyer-Tomic & M John Hodgson, 2002. "Measuring Neighbourhood Spatial Accessibility to Urban Amenities: Does Aggregation Error Matter?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(7), pages 1185-1206, July.
    3. Rachel Guillain & Julie Le Gallo & Céline Boiteux-Orain, 2006. "Changes in spatial and sectoral patterns of employment in Ile-de-France, 1978-1997," Post-Print hal-00485018, HAL.
    4. Rachel Guillain & Julie Le Gallo & Céline Boîteux-Orain, 2006. "Changes in spatial and sectoral patterns of employment in Ile-de-France, 1978-1997," Post-Print halshs-00109434, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Qiong & Chand, Satish, 2015. "Spatial spillovers of regional wages: Evidence from Chinese provinces," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 97-109.
    2. Triki, Mohamed Bilel, 2019. "The Italian wage curve revisited: A local and spatial cointegration," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 55, pages 73-90.
    3. Maite Blázquez & Carlos Llano & Julian Moral, 2010. "Commuting Times: Is There Any Penalty for Immigrants?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(8), pages 1663-1686, July.
    4. Miquel-Àngel García-López, 2010. "The Accessibility City. When Transport Infrastructure Matters in Urban Spatial Structure," Working Papers XREAP2010-01, Xarxa de Referència en Economia Aplicada (XREAP), revised Feb 2010.
    5. Robert Manduca, 2021. "The spatial structure of US metropolitan employment: New insights from administrative data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1357-1372, June.
    6. Luca Salvati & Giuseppe Venanzoni & Pere Serra & Margherita Carlucci, 2016. "Scattered or polycentric? Untangling urban growth in three southern European metropolitan regions through exploratory spatial data analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 57(1), pages 1-29, July.
    7. Ivan Muñiz & Miguel-Àngel García-López, 2012. "Chaos and order in the contemporary city. The impact of urban spatial structure on population density and commuting distance in Barcelona, 1986-2001," Working Papers wpdea1207, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    8. Gabriel Rodríguez & Juan Palomino, 2019. "Peru's Regional Growth and Convergence in 1979-2017: An Empirical Spatial Panel Data Analysis," Documentos de Trabajo / Working Papers 2019-478, Departamento de Economía - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
    9. Andrew Robert Watkins, 2009. "The Dynamics of Urban Economies: Melbourne 1971 to 2006," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(8), pages 1553-1576, July.
    10. Amaya Vega & Aisling Reynolds-Feighan, 2008. "Employment Sub-centres and Travel-to-Work Mode Choice in the Dublin Region," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(9), pages 1747-1768, August.
    11. Akiko Sakanishi, 2020. "Spatial analysis of female labor force participation rates in Japan," International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 351-361, August.
    12. Andrea L. Sparks & Neil Bania & Laura Leete, 2011. "Comparative Approaches to Measuring Food Access in Urban Areas," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(8), pages 1715-1737, June.
    13. Jacobson, Jerry Owen & Robinson, Paul & Bluthenthal, Ricky N., 2007. "A multilevel decomposition approach to estimate the role of program location and neighborhood disadvantage in racial disparities in alcohol treatment completion," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 462-476, January.
    14. Maria Teresa Borzacchiello & Peter Nijkamp & Eric Koomen, 2010. "Accessibility and Urban Development: A Grid-Based Comparative Statistical Analysis of Dutch Cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(1), pages 148-169, February.
    15. Zuo, Jialing & Zheng, Wei & Hong, Jingke, 2024. "Interactions between centrality and commuting costs in a mountainous city: Implications for jobs-housing relationships and land use policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Richard Fry & Scott Orford & Sarah Rodgers & Jennifer Morgan & David Fone, 2020. "A best practice framework to measure spatial variation in alcohol availability," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(3), pages 381-399, March.
    17. Chen, Wendong & Cheng, Long & Chen, Xuewu & Chen, Jingxu & Cao, Mengqiu, 2021. "Measuring accessibility to health care services for older bus passengers: A finer spatial resolution," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    18. Jamie E L Spinney & Hugh Millward, 2013. "Investigating Travel Thresholds for Sports and Recreation Activities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(3), pages 474-488, June.
    19. Yoo Min Park & Mei-Po Kwan, 2020. "Understanding Racial Disparities in Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution: Considering the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Population Distribution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-14, February.
    20. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Sajadi, Afshin, 2024. "Principles of just urban land use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:43:y:2016:i:6:p:1096-1117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.