IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v27y2000i6p801-814.html

Mapping Policy Discourse with CRANES: Spatial Understanding Support Systems as a Medium for Community Conflict Resolution

Author

Listed:
  • Masahide Horita

    (Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, England)

Abstract

In this paper I will report on the development of a new spatial understanding support system (SUSS) for representing community disputes. It is argued that the more traditional approach of spatial decision support systems (SDSS) has had limited success in its application to actual community conflicts. In this study I have therefore adopted an alternative approach to spatial decision support, broadly following the paradigm of soft operational research. A prototype system termed CRANES (coordinator for rational arguments through nested substantiation) has been developed based on this alternative approach, integrated with a GIS. CRANES is a computer-assisted communication tool that aims to structure conflicts with their geographical, strategic, and argumentative dimensions. In the case study CRANES was introduced into an actual consultation exercise on an urban regeneration scheme in London. Results show that the multidimensional representation realised by CRANES contributed to a richer understanding of other peoples' arguments. Furthermore these arguments structured by and stored in CRANES proved to be a useful public resource for future decision making. It is concluded that SUSS such as CRANES could be incorporated into a future consultation process for many real-world community conflicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Masahide Horita, 2000. "Mapping Policy Discourse with CRANES: Spatial Understanding Support Systems as a Medium for Community Conflict Resolution," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 27(6), pages 801-814, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:27:y:2000:i:6:p:801-814
    DOI: 10.1068/b2646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b2646
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b2646?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caruso, C. & Colorni, A. & Paruccini, M., 1993. "The regional urban solid waste management system: A modelling approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 16-30, October.
    2. Annette Hastings, 1999. "Discourse and Urban Change: Introduction to the Special Issue," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(1), pages 7-12, January.
    3. Masahide Horita, 2000. "Folding Arguments: A Method for Representing Conflicting Views of a Conflict," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 63-83, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruce Taylor & Tabatha Wallington & Sonja Heyenga & Ben Harman, 2014. "Urban Growth and Climate Adaptation in Australia: Divergent Discourses and Implications for Policy-making," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(1), pages 3-21, January.
    2. E D Adamides & P Mitropoulos & I Giannikos & I Mitropoulos, 2009. "A multi-methodological approach to the development of a regional solid waste management system," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(6), pages 758-770, June.
    3. Fleischmann, Moritz & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M. & Dekker, Rommert & van der Laan, Erwin & van Nunen, Jo A. E. E. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 1997. "Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Lorenzo Vidal & Javier Gil & Miguel A Martínez, 2024. "Accommodating ‘generation rent’: Unsettling dominant discourses on rental housing reform in Catalonia and Spain," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(11), pages 2060-2079, August.
    5. Bazzani, Guido Maria, 1998. "Integrated Soil Waste Management: A Multicriteria Approach," Conference Papers 14492, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    6. Hokkanen, Joonas & Salminen, Pekka, 1997. "Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 19-36, April.
    7. Min, Hokey & Ko, Hyun-Jeung, 2008. "The dynamic design of a reverse logistics network from the perspective of third-party logistics service providers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 176-192, May.
    8. Valentina Ferretti & Silvia Pomarico, 2012. "Integrated sustainability assessments: a spatial multicriteria evaluation for siting a waste incinerator plant in the Province of Torino (Italy)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 843-867, October.
    9. Jiang Xu, 2016. "Environmental discourses in China’s urban planning system: A scaled discourse-analytical perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(5), pages 978-999, April.
    10. Karagiannidis, Avraam & Moussiopoulos, Nicolas, 1997. "Application of ELECTRE III for the integrated management of municipal solid wastes in the Greater Athens Area," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 439-449, March.
    11. Kevin Fox Gotham, 2002. "Marketing Mardi Gras: Commodification, Spectacle and the Political Economy of Tourism in New Orleans," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(10), pages 1735-1756, September.
    12. Yu Maemura & Masahide Horita, 2012. "Humour in Negotiations: A Pragmatic Analysis of Humour in Simulated Negotiations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 821-838, November.
    13. Salema, Maria Isabel Gomes & Barbosa-Povoa, Ana Paula & Novais, Augusto Q., 2007. "An optimization model for the design of a capacitated multi-product reverse logistics network with uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(3), pages 1063-1077, June.
    14. Fazito, Mozart & Scott, Mark & Russell, Paula, 2016. "The dynamics of tourism discourses and policy in Brazil," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-17.
    15. Lundin, Johan F., 2012. "Redesigning a closed-loop supply chain exposed to risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 596-603.
    16. Daniel, S. E. & Diakoulaki, D. C. & Pappis, C. P., 1997. "Operations research and environmental planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 248-263, October.
    17. L K Chu & Y Shi & S Lin & D Sculli & J Ni, 2010. "Fuzzy chance-constrained programming model for a multi-echelon reverse logistics network for household appliances," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(4), pages 551-560, April.
    18. Thomas Buhler & Virginie Lethier, 2020. "Analysing urban policy discourses using textometry: An application to French urban transport plans (2000–2015)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(10), pages 2181-2197, August.
    19. Krikke, H.R. & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M. & Van Wassenhove, L.N., 2001. "Design of Closed Loop Supply Chains," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-45-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    20. Eskandarpour, Majid & Dejax, Pierre & Miemczyk, Joe & Péton, Olivier, 2015. "Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-32.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:27:y:2000:i:6:p:801-814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.