IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v20y1993i4p447-457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Choice Alternative to School Assignment

Author

Listed:
  • R L Church

    (National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis and Department of Geography, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060, USA)

  • O B Schoepfle

    (Department of Geography, Boston University, 675 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA)

Abstract

The problems associated with the reassignment of students to schools, whether the result of closures, expansions, grade reconfigurations, or district desegregation, are some of the most difficult problems that school administrators must face. These problems are compounded with the political backlash that can result whenever parents sense a loss of control over their schools. An increasingly popular approach to reassignment, however, is to allow ‘choice’. When parental choices are honored, the otherwise adversary relationships between parents and administrators are diminished and community support for schools is strengthened. In this paper is a series of mathematical programming formulations which can enable administrators rapidly to generate alternative assignment schemes that maximize choice. In addition, these multiobjective frameworks allow the explicit analysis of the trade-offs between a variety of important but competing objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • R L Church & O B Schoepfle, 1993. "The Choice Alternative to School Assignment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 20(4), pages 447-457, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:20:y:1993:i:4:p:447-457
    DOI: 10.1068/b200447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b200447
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b200447?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clarke, S. & Surkis, J., 1968. "An operations research approach to racial desegregation of school systems," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 259-272, July.
    2. C M S Sutcliffe & J L G Board, 1986. "Designing Secondary School Catchment Areas Using Goal Programming," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 18(5), pages 661-675, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lemberg, David S. & Church, Richard L., 2000. "The school boundary stability problem over time," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 159-176, September.
    2. Haase, Knut & Müller, Sven, 2013. "Management of school locations allowing for free school choice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 847-855.
    3. Eric Delmelle & Jean-Claude Thill & Dominique Peeters & Isabelle Thomas, 2014. "A multi-period capacitated school location problem with modular equipment and closest assignment considerations," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 263-286, July.
    4. Teixeira, Joao C. & Antunes, Antonio P., 2008. "A hierarchical location model for public facility planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 92-104, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malczewski, Jacek & Jackson, Marlene, 2000. "Multicriteria spatial allocation of educational resources: an overview," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 219-235, September.
    2. F Caro & T Shirabe & M Guignard & A Weintraub, 2004. "School redistricting: embedding GIS tools with integer programming," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(8), pages 836-849, August.
    3. Eric Delmelle & Jean-Claude Thill & Dominique Peeters & Isabelle Thomas, 2014. "A multi-period capacitated school location problem with modular equipment and closest assignment considerations," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 263-286, July.
    4. Lemberg, David S. & Church, Richard L., 2000. "The school boundary stability problem over time," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 159-176, September.
    5. G P Clarke & R Langley, 1996. "A Review of the Potential of GIS and Spatial Modelling for Planning in the New Education Market," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 14(3), pages 301-323, September.
    6. Elizondo, Rodolpho & Andrew Boyd, E. & Beauregard, Maxwell, 1997. "Evaluating school facility capacity and attendance boundaries using a large-scale assignment algorithm," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 155-161, April.
    7. Katarzyna Kopczewska, 2013. "The spatial range of local governments: does geographical distance affect governance and public service?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 51(3), pages 793-810, December.
    8. Mayerle, Sérgio F. & Rodrigues, Hidelbrando F. & Neiva de Figueiredo, João & De Genaro Chiroli, Daiane M., 2022. "Optimal student/school/class/teacher/classroom matching to support efficient public school system resource allocation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    9. Bouzarth, Elizabeth L. & Forrester, Richard & Hutson, Kevin R. & Reddoch, Lattie, 2018. "Assigning students to schools to minimize both transportation costs and socioeconomic variation between schools," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1-8.
    10. Itai Ashlagi & Peng Shi, 2016. "Optimal Allocation Without Money: An Engineering Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 1078-1097, April.
    11. Liao, Cong & Scheuer, Bronte & Dai, Teqi & Tian, Yuan, 2020. "Optimizing the spatial assignment of schools to reduce both inequality of educational opportunity and potential opposition rate through introducing random mechanism into proximity-based system," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:20:y:1993:i:4:p:447-457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.