IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v44y2012i5p1101-1120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Social Networks in Geographic Space: Approach and Empirical Application

Author

Listed:
  • Theo Arentze
  • Pauline van den Berg
  • Harry Timmermans

Abstract

Social activities are responsible for a large proportion of travel demands of individuals. Modeling of the social network of a studied population offers a basis to predict social travel in a more comprehensive way than currently is possible. In this paper we develop a method to generate a whole social network for a given population focusing on friendship relationships. The core of the method is a friendship-formation model that predicts for any two given persons from a population the probability that a friendship relationship exists between the persons. The model takes into account the degree of similarity in attributes, geographic distance between the persons as well as threshold values representing the persons' opportunities and base preferences for engagement in a friendship relationship. We show how the model can be estimated on the basis of observed personal social networks from a sample of individuals. We estimate and test the model using data collected in a recent survey in Eindhoven, The Netherlands. The results indicate that the model is able to generate networks that display the same structural properties as we find in the sample data. A synthetic network generated in this way can be used to microsimulate social interactions in a population in geographic space

Suggested Citation

  • Theo Arentze & Pauline van den Berg & Harry Timmermans, 2012. "Modeling Social Networks in Geographic Space: Approach and Empirical Application," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(5), pages 1101-1120, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:44:y:2012:i:5:p:1101-1120
    DOI: 10.1068/a4438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a4438
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a4438?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Charypar & Kai Nagel, 2005. "Generating complete all-day activity plans with genetic algorithms," Transportation, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 369-397, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maness, Michael, 2017. "Comparison of social capital indicators from position generators and name generators in predicting activity selection," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 374-395.
    2. Arentze, Theo A., 2015. "Individuals' social preferences in joint activity location choice: A negotiation model and empirical evidence," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 76-84.
    3. Maness, Michael & Cirillo, Cinzia & Dugundji, Elenna R., 2015. "Generalized behavioral framework for choice models of social influence: Behavioral and data concerns in travel behavior," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 137-150.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gurumurthy, Krishna Murthy & Kockelman, Kara M., 2021. "Impacts of shared automated vehicles on airport access and operations, with opportunities for revenue recovery: Case Study of Austin, Texas," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Schwarz, Gregor & Bichler, Martin, 2022. "How to trade thirty thousand products: A wholesale market design for road capacity," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 167-185.
    3. Zahra Navidi & Nicole Ronald & Stephan Winter, 2018. "Comparison between ad-hoc demand responsive and conventional transit: a simulation study," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 147-167, May.
    4. Amit Agarwal & Benjamin Kickhöfer, 2018. "The correlation of externalities in marginal cost pricing: lessons learned from a real-world case study," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 849-873, May.
    5. Saadi, Ismaïl & Mustafa, Ahmed & Teller, Jacques & Cools, Mario, 2018. "Investigating the impact of river floods on travel demand based on an agent-based modeling approach: The case of Liège, Belgium," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 102-110.
    6. Hackney, Jeremy & Marchal, Fabrice, 2011. "A coupled multi-agent microsimulation of social interactions and transportation behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 296-309, May.
    7. Gunnar Flötteröd & Yu Chen & Kai Nagel, 2012. "Behavioral Calibration and Analysis of a Large-Scale Travel Microsimulation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 481-502, December.
    8. Francesco Ciari & Milos Balac & Michael Balmer, 2015. "Modelling the effect of different pricing schemes on free-floating carsharing travel demand: a test case for Zurich, Switzerland," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 413-433, May.
    9. Thibaut Dubernet & Kay Axhausen, 2015. "Implementing a household joint activity-travel multi- agent simulation tool: first results," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 753-769, September.
    10. Kaddoura, Ihab & Nagel, Kai, 2019. "Congestion pricing in a real-world oriented agent-based simulation context," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 40-51.
    11. Alejandro Rojano-Padrón & Marc Olivier Metais & Francisco J. Ramos-Real & Yannick Perez, 2023. "Tenerife’s Infrastructure Plan for Electromobility: A MATSim Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, January.
    12. Dimitrios Rizopoulos & Domokos Esztergár-Kiss, 2020. "A Method for the Optimization of Daily Activity Chains Including Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Huang, Arthur & Levinson, David, 2017. "A model of two-destination choice in trip chains with GPS data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 51-62.
    14. Konrad Meister & Martin Frick & Kay Axhausen, 2005. "A GA-based household scheduler," Transportation, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 473-494, September.
    15. Ren, Xiyuan & Chow, Joseph Y.J., 2022. "A random-utility-consistent machine learning method to estimate agents’ joint activity scheduling choice from a ubiquitous data set," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 396-418.
    16. Ihab Kaddoura & Benjamin Kickhöfer & Andreas Neumann & Alejandro Tirachini, 2015. "Agent-based optimisation of public transport supply and pricing: impacts of activity scheduling decisions and simulation randomness," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(6), pages 1039-1061, November.
    17. Jamil Hamadneh & Domokos Esztergár-Kiss, 2021. "The Influence of Introducing Autonomous Vehicles on Conventional Transport Modes and Travel Time," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-28, July.
    18. Badiola, Nicolás & Raveau, Sebastián & Galilea, Patricia, 2019. "Modelling preferences towards activities and their effect on departure time choices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 39-51.
    19. Ihab Kaddoura & Kai Nagel, 2018. "Simultaneous internalization of traffic congestion and noise exposure costs," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1579-1600, September.
    20. Dimitrios Rizopoulos & Domokos Esztergár-Kiss, 2023. "Heuristic time-dependent personal scheduling problem with electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 2009-2048, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:44:y:2012:i:5:p:1101-1120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.