IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v44y2012i1p221-236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gentrifiers and Their Choice of Housing: Characteristics of the Households Living in New Developments in Swiss Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Rérat

    (Institute of Geography and Research Group in Territorial Economy, University of Neuchâtel, Espace Louis-Agassiz 1, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland)

Abstract

This paper draws on the literature on residential mobility in order to address the housing choice of gentrifiers and its different dimensions (profile, trajectories, and motivations). The gentrification literature is reviewed in regard to these dimensions. Empirical material is based on questionnaires sent to the inhabitants of new high-status developments (new-build gentrification) in two Swiss cities (Zurich and Neuchâtel). By pointing out some of the characteristics found in the Swiss context, the results contribute to an understanding of the attributes of contemporary gentrifiers, such as their diversity in terms of life-course position, the transitory stage that living in a gentrified neighbourhood may represent, and the predominance of the convenience of urban life (proximity and mobility) in their motivations.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Rérat, 2012. "Gentrifiers and Their Choice of Housing: Characteristics of the Households Living in New Developments in Swiss Cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(1), pages 221-236, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:44:y:2012:i:1:p:221-236
    DOI: 10.1068/a4496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a4496
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a4496?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Hamnett & Drew Whitelegg, 2007. "Loft Conversion and Gentrification in London: From Industrial to Postindustrial Land Use," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(1), pages 106-124, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olabisi S. Obaitor & Marion Stellmes & Tobia Lakes, 2024. "Exploring Spatio-Temporal Pattern of Gentrification Processes in Intracity Slums in the Lagos Megacity," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Tim Butler, 2007. "Re‐urbanizing London Docklands: Gentrification, Suburbanization or New Urbanism?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 759-781, December.
    3. Nagao, Kenkichi & Edgington, David W., 2023. "Local industrial displacement, zoning conflicts and monozukuri planning in Higashi Osaka, Japan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Nathan, Max, 2022. "Does light touch cluster policy work? Evaluating the tech city programme," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    5. Margarida Madaleno & Max Nathan & Henry Overman & Sevrin Waights, 2018. "Incubators, accelerators and regional economic development," CEP Discussion Papers dp1575, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    6. Mark Davidson, 2008. "Spoiled Mixture: Where Does State-led `Positive' Gentrification End?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2385-2405, November.
    7. T. C. Chang & Shirlena Huang, 2011. "Reclaiming the City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(10), pages 2085-2100, August.
    8. Alessandro Venerandi & Mattia Zanella & Ombretta Romice & Jacob Dibble & Sergio Porta, 2017. "Form and urban change – An urban morphometric study of five gentrified neighbourhoods in London," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(6), pages 1056-1076, November.
    9. Lance Freeman & Adele Cassola & Tiancheng Cai, 2016. "Displacement and gentrification in England and Wales: A quasi-experimental approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(13), pages 2797-2814, October.
    10. Katherine Brookfield & Charlotte Dimond & Susannah G. Williams, 2022. "Sustainability Messages in Residential Property Advertising," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Margarida Madaleno & Max Nathan & Henry Overman & Sevrin Waights, 2022. "Incubators, accelerators and urban economic development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(2), pages 281-300, February.
    12. Rosemary D.F. Bromley & Peter K. Mackie, 2009. "Displacement and the New Spaces for Informal Trade in the Latin American City Centre," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(7), pages 1485-1506, June.
    13. Chapple, Karen & Loukaitou-Sideris, Anastasia & Gonzalez, Silvia R. & Kadin, Dov & Poirer, Joseph, 2018. "Transit Oriented Development and Commercial Gentrification: Exploring the Linkages," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5ng0f1f6, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    14. Henning Füller & Boris Michel, 2014. "‘Stop Being a Tourist!’ New Dynamics of Urban Tourism in Berlin-Kreuzberg," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1304-1318, July.
    15. Kath Hulse & Margaret Reynolds, 2018. "Investification: Financialisation of housing markets and persistence of suburban socio-economic disadvantage," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(8), pages 1655-1671, June.
    16. Wonjun Cho & Minho Kim & Hyunjung Kim & Youngsang Kwon, 2020. "Transforming Housing to Commercial Use: A Case Study on Commercial Gentrification in Yeon-nam District, Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Yoonku Kwon & Shinha Joo & Soyoung Han & Chan Park, 2017. "Mapping the Distribution Pattern of Gentrification near Urban Parks in the Case of Gyeongui Line Forest Park, Seoul, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Darren P Smith & Tim Butler, 2007. "Conceptualising the Sociospatial Diversity of Gentrification: ‘To Boldly Go’ into Contemporary Gentrified Spaces, the ‘Final Frontier’?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(1), pages 2-9, January.
    19. Jinlong Gao & Zhixuan Wu & Jianglong Chen & Wen Chen, 2020. "Beyond the bid‐rent: Two tales of land use transition in contemporary China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1336-1356, September.
    20. Gordon L. Clark & Roberto Durán-Fernández & Kendra Strauss, 2010. "'Being in the market': the UK house-price bubble and the intended structure of individual pension investment portfolios," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 331-359, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:44:y:2012:i:1:p:221-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.