IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v42y2010i3p545-562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Floating Choices: A Generational Perspective on Intentions of Rural–Urban Migrants in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongshan Yue

    (School of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710049, China, and Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA)

  • Shuzhuo Li

    (Institute for Population and Develoment Studies, School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710049, China)

  • Marcus W Feldman

    (Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA)

  • Haifeng Du

    (Center for Public Administration and Complexity Science, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710049, China)

Abstract

Using data from a 2005 survey of rural–urban migrants in Shenzhen, we investigate the intentions of two groups of migrants. We use the birth years from 1970 to 1980 as a reasonable range of dividing lines to separate the two groups. For each year we divide the sample into those born before that year and those born in or after that year. These are referred to as the old generation and the new generation, respectively. Three possible development trajectories are considered: settling in cities, returning home to seek a nonagricultural job, and returning home to farm. We find that members of the new generation have stronger desires to do nonfarm work, and that returning to seek a nonagricultural job has become the most important planned trajectory for this generation. Sharp differences exist between the two generations in the reasons that underlie their intentions. For the old generation, conditions such as age, family responsibility, and type of job are important determinants of intentions, while other conditions such as initial migration motives, social capital, and socioeconomic conditions of origin areas are important for the intentions of the new generation. Thus the new generation is more likely to view migration as a form of investment with the accumulation of human capital and social capital. Those migrants from the old generation who have higher education levels also intend to seek a nonfarm job. However, because of the combined effects of life cycle and the market transition in China, these intentions are not as strong as those of the new generation. We discuss economic and policy implications of our findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongshan Yue & Shuzhuo Li & Marcus W Feldman & Haifeng Du, 2010. "Floating Choices: A Generational Perspective on Intentions of Rural–Urban Migrants in China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(3), pages 545-562, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:42:y:2010:i:3:p:545-562
    DOI: 10.1068/a42161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a42161
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a42161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ellis, Mark & Goodwin-White, Jamie, 2006. "1.5 Generation Internal Migration in the US: Dispersion from States of Immigration?," IZA Discussion Papers 2274, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Wenfei Winnie Wang & C Cindy Fan, 2006. "Success or Failure: Selectivity and Reasons of Return Migration in Sichuan and Anhui, China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(5), pages 939-958, May.
    3. Oded Stark, 1991. "The Migration of Labor," Blackwell Books, Wiley Blackwell, number 1557860300, June.
    4. Zhao, Yaohui, 2002. "Causes and Consequences of Return Migration: Recent Evidence from China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 376-394, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dan Li & Yulei Weng & Xiaocong Yang & Kai Zhao, 2019. "Self-Deprecation or Self-Sufficient? Discrimination and Income Aspirations in Urban Labour Market Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Kilian Pamela Hartmann & Kraas Frauke & Schiller Daniel, 2012. "Workplace quality and labour turnover in the electronics industry of the Pearl River Delta, China," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 56(1-2), pages 58-79, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li Hao, 2022. "Impact of Relaxing the Hukou Constraints on Return Migration Intentions: Evidence from China," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(2), pages 583-607, April.
    2. Xiaoyan Mu & Anthony Gar-On Yeh & Xiaohu Zhang & Jiejing Wang & Jian Lin, 2022. "Moving down the urban hierarchy: Turning point of China’s internal migration caused by age structure and hukou system," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(7), pages 1389-1405, May.
    3. Coniglio, Nicola & De Arcangelis, Giuseppe & Serlenga, Laura, 2006. "Intentions to Return of Undocumented Migrants: Illegality as a Cause of Skill Waste," IZA Discussion Papers 2356, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Démurger, Sylvie & Xu, Hui, 2011. "Return Migrants: The Rise of New Entrepreneurs in Rural China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 1847-1861.
    5. Lianying Yao & Xuewen Li & Rongrong Zheng & Yiye Zhang, 2022. "The Impact of Air Pollution Perception on Urban Settlement Intentions of Young Talent in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Alan de Brauw & Scott Rozelle, 2003. "Household Investment through migration in Rural China," Department of Economics Working Papers 2003-01, Department of Economics, Williams College.
    7. Ji, Yueqing & Yu, Xiaohua & Zhong, Funing, 2012. "Machinery investment decision and off-farm employment in rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 71-80.
    8. Zane Varpina & Kata Fredheim, 2022. "The Covid-19 pandemic’s impact on migrants’ decision to return home to Latvia," SSE Riga/BICEPS Occasional Papers 16, Baltic International Centre for Economic Policy Studies (BICEPS);Stockholm School of Economics in Riga (SSE Riga).
    9. Pu Hao & Shuangshuang Tang, 2015. "Floating or settling down: the effect of rural landholdings on the settlement intention of rural migrants in urban China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(9), pages 1979-1999, September.
    10. Zakharenko, Roman, 2007. "Migration, Learning, and Development," MPRA Paper 6262, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Qian, Wenrong & Li, Baozhi & Zheng, Liyi, 2015. "The Impact of Non-Agricultural Employment on Farmland Transfer and Investment in Agricultural Assets: Evidence from China," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212703, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. de Brauw, Alan & Rozelle, Scott, 2008. "Migration and household investment in rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 320-335, June.
    13. Zhang, Jipeng & Huang, Jin & Wang, Junhui & Guo, Liang, 2020. "Return migration and Hukou registration constraints in Chinese cities," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    14. Hirvonen, Kalle & Lilleør, Helene Bie, 2015. "Going Back Home: Internal Return Migration in Rural Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 186-202.
    15. Nicola D. Coniglio & Giuseppe De Arcangelis & Laura Serlenga, 2006. "Intentions to Return of Irregular Migrants: Illegality as a Cause of Skill Waste," SERIES 0011, Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza - Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro", revised Feb 2006.
    16. Bai, Y. & Wang, W. & Zhang, L., 2018. "How long do returning migrants stay in their home county: Evidence from rural China during 1998 to 2015," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277380, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Nicola D. Coniglio & Giuseppe De Arcangelis & Laura Serlenga, 2009. "Clandestine Migrants: Do the High-Skilled Return Home First?," Working Papers 80, Sapienza University of Rome, CIDEI.
    18. Feiwei Shen & Jing Zou & Xianhong Huang & Cong Wang & Mingjie Zhao, 2022. "Career Development, Institutional Factors, Social Factors and Urban Young Returnees’ Happiness in the Context of Healthy China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-20, July.
    19. Erika Arenas & Noreen Goldman & Anne Pebley & Graciela Teruel, 2015. "Return Migration to Mexico: Does Health Matter?," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 52(6), pages 1853-1868, December.
    20. Chen Chen & C Cindy Fan, 2018. "Gender and generational differences in first outward- and first inward-moves: An event-history analysis of rural migrants in China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(8), pages 1646-1669, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:42:y:2010:i:3:p:545-562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.