IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v34y2002i10p1725-1747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond the Sunan Model: Trajectory and Underlying Factors of Development in Kunshan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yehua Dennis Wei

    (Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA)

Abstract

Since the launch of economic reforms in the late 1970s, some cities and regions in China have been growing much faster than others, stimulating scholarly research on the forces underlying uneven development. This paper, through a case study of the emergence of Kunshan in southern Jiangsu (Sunan), shows that the orthodox Sunan model centered on the development of township and village enterprises (TVEs) has become inadequate to account for the recent development and restructuring in Sunan. I argue that spatial development in China is a complicated process incorporating the role of the state, local development conditions, and foreign investment. Moreover, there are strong geographical foundations for the functioning of local states. The arguments are particularly relevant to the transitional nature of provincial China, where the state still plays a significant role in development while local and global forces have emerged as equally important forces.

Suggested Citation

  • Yehua Dennis Wei, 2002. "Beyond the Sunan Model: Trajectory and Underlying Factors of Development in Kunshan, China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(10), pages 1725-1747, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:34:y:2002:i:10:p:1725-1747
    DOI: 10.1068/a3567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a3567
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a3567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Brohman, 1996. "Postwar Development in the Asian NICs: Does the Neoliberal Model Fit Reality?," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(2), pages 107-130, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ling Zhang & Yehua Dennis Wei & Ran Meng, 2017. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Spatial Determinants of Urban Growth in Suzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Canfei He & Qi Guo & David Rigby, 2017. "What sustains larger firms? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing industries," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 58(2), pages 275-300, March.
    3. Elvis Cheng Xu, 2019. "Impacts of Urbanisation on Trust: Evidence from an Experiment in the Field," Discussion Papers 2019-10, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    4. Yehua Dennis Wei & Xinyue Ye, 2004. "Regional Inequality in China: A Case Study of Zhejiang Province," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 95(1), pages 44-60, February.
    5. Yuan Yuan & Hongbo Li & Xiaolin Zhang & Xiaoliang Hu & Yahua Wang, 2019. "Emerging Location-Based Service Data on Perceiving and Measuring Multifunctionality of Rural Space: A Study of Suzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Shen, Xiaoxiao & Tsai, Kellee S., 2016. "Institutional Adaptability in China: Local Developmental Models Under Changing Economic Conditions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 107-127.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Burkett & Martin Hart-Landsberg, 2000. "Alternative Perspectives on Late Industrialization in East Asia: A Critical Survey," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 32(2), pages 222-264, June.
    2. Deshmukh, Ranjit & Bharvirkar, Ranjit & Gambhir, Ashwin & Phadke, Amol, 2012. "Changing Sunshine: Analyzing the dynamics of solar electricity policies in the global context," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 5188-5198.
    3. Joseph Nathan Cohen & Miguel Angel Centeno, 2006. "Neoliberalism and Patterns of Economic Performance, 1980-2000," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 606(1), pages 32-67, July.
    4. Shujie Yao & Zongyi Zhang, 2003. "Openness and Economic Performance: A Comparative Study of China and the Asian NIEs," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 71-95.
    5. Calixto Salomão Filho, 2015. "Monopolies and Underdevelopment," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 16587.
    6. Tshepo T. Gwatiwa, 2012. "The Dark Spots in the Japan-Africa Political Economy," Insight on Africa, , vol. 4(1), pages 69-86, January.
    7. Shujie Yao, 2006. "On economic growth, FDI and exports in China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 339-351.
    8. Lee Yong-Shik, 2018. "Law and Development: Lessons from South Korea," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 433-465, December.
    9. Cohen, Joseph N. & Centeno, Miguel A., 2006. "Neoliberalism and patterns of economic performance: 1980 to 2000," MPRA Paper 22436, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Roger Hayter & Sun Sheng Han, 1998. "Reflections on China's Open Policy Towards Foreign Direct Investment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 1-16.
    11. Lee Yong-Shik, 2019. "Political Governance, Law, and Economic Development," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 723-759, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:34:y:2002:i:10:p:1725-1747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.