IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v32y2000i6p1115-1134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Housing Consumption in Urban China: A Comparative Study of Beijing and Guangzhou

Author

Listed:
  • Si-ming Li

    (Department of Geography, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong)

Abstract

The Chinese government has made repeated attempts to end the so-called welfare provision of housing so as to reduce the burden on the state and the individual work units. Development companies have been set up to undertake housing construction and the housing units sold as commodities; these are referred to as ‘commodity housing’. The author conducts a comparative study of housing consumption in Beijing and Guangzhou, drawing upon two surveys of newly completed commodity housing conducted in 1996. In Beijing, which is dominated by the traditional socialist system of economic and social organisation, only a tiny portion of such housing is traded on the open market. In Guangzhou, where many of the market-oriented reform measures were first experimented with, the open market already accounts for a substantial proportion of the newly constructed stock. In both Beijing and Guangzhou, however, the work unit still constitutes the single most important buyer and distributor of commodity housing. Further, if the analysis is restricted to the subsidised sectors, which also include housing managed by the municipal housing bureau and resettlement housing, a comparison of the two samples reveals quite similar differential factors underlying housing consumption in the two cities, despite their difference in social and economic structure. The traditional redistributive system still exerts tremendous influence on housing consumption, even in cities renowned for their openness and market orientation. Certain differences in the results between the two cities are also revealed. For example, seniority is important only in Beijing, whereas professional and technical workers assume a special position only in Guangzhou. These differences point towards the importance of contextual considerations in the study of housing consumption in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Si-ming Li, 2000. "Housing Consumption in Urban China: A Comparative Study of Beijing and Guangzhou," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(6), pages 1115-1134, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:32:y:2000:i:6:p:1115-1134
    DOI: 10.1068/a32145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a32145
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a32145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fulong Wu, 1997. "Urban restructuring in China’s emerging market economy: towards a framework for analysis," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 640-663, December.
    2. Polinsky, A Mitchell, 1977. "The Demand for Housing: A Study in Specification and Grouping," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 45(2), pages 447-461, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferda Halicioglu, 2007. "The demand for new housing in Turkey: an application of ARDL model," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 62-74.
    2. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    3. Chengri Ding, 2004. "Urban Spatial Development in the Land Policy Reform Era: Evidence from Beijing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(10), pages 1889-1907, September.
    4. B.G. Dahlby, 1982. "Traditional View of the Incidence of the Property Tax: an Examination," Public Finance Review, , vol. 10(3), pages 369-383, July.
    5. Kasy, Maximilian, 2015. "Identification in a model of sorting with social externalities and the causes of urban segregation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 16-33.
    6. Isaac F. Megbolugbe & Peter D. Linneman, 1993. "Home Ownership," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(4-5), pages 659-682, May.
    7. Daniel H. Weinberg, 1982. "Housing Benefits From the Section 8 Housing Program," Evaluation Review, , vol. 6(1), pages 5-24, February.
    8. Harvey Cutler & Irina Strelnikova, 2004. "The Impact of the US Sales Tax Rate on City Size and Economic Activity: A CGE Approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(4), pages 875-885, April.
    9. Daniel You-Ren Yang & Hung-Kai Wang, 2008. "Dilemmas of Local Governance under the Development Zone Fever in China: A Case Study of the Suzhou Region," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1037-1054, May.
    10. Hai-Min Lyu & Wen-Chieh Cheng & Jack Shuilong Shen & Arul Arulrajah, 2018. "Investigation of Collapsed Building Incidents on Soft Marine Deposit: Both from Social and Technical Perspectives," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, February.
    11. Martin Feldstein, 1983. "Inflation, Tax Rules, and the Accumulation of Residential and Nonresidential Capital," NBER Chapters, in: Inflation, Tax Rules, and Capital Formation, pages 81-100, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. G. Donald Jud & James Frew, 1986. "Real Estate Brokers, Housing Prices, and the Demand for Housing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 23(1), pages 21-31, February.
    13. Feng, Rundong & Wang, Kaiyong, 2021. "Spatiotemporal effects of administrative division adjustment on urban expansion in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    14. H. Allen Klaiber & Ulrich B. Morawetz, 2021. "The Welfare Impacts of Large Urban Noise Reductions: Implications from Household Sorting in Vienna," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 78(1), pages 121-146, January.
    15. Douglas B. Diamond JR, 1980. "Income and Residential Location: Muth Revisited," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 17(1), pages 1-12, February.
    16. Hyun Bang Shin, 2009. "Residential Redevelopment and the Entrepreneurial Local State: The Implications of Beijing’s Shifting Emphasis on Urban Redevelopment Policies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(13), pages 2815-2839, December.
    17. Sun, Xiaojin & Tsang, Kwok Ping, 2019. "Large price movements in housing markets," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1-23.
    18. Mikaela Backman, 2014. "Returns to Education across the Urban-Rural Hierarchy," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 44(1), pages 33-59, Spring.
    19. Feldstein, Martin, 1981. "The Distribution of the U.S. Capital Stock Between Residential and Industrial Uses," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 19(1), pages 26-37, January.
    20. Bin Li & Kaihan Yang & Konstantin E. Axenov & Long Zhou & Huiming Liu, 2022. "Trade-Offs, Adaptation and Adaptive Governance of Urban Regeneration in Guangzhou, China (2009–2019)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:32:y:2000:i:6:p:1115-1134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.