IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v17y1985i10p1315-1329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Longitudinal versus Cross-Sectional Methods for Behavioural Research: A First-Round Knockout

Author

Listed:
  • R B Davies

    (Department of Town Planning, University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology, Colum Drive. Cardiff CF1 3EU, Wales)

  • A R Pickles

    (Department of Geography, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60201, USA; and Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge CB2 3EN, England)

Abstract

It is explained that statistical problems over omitted variables and endogenous factors cast doubt upon the wisdom of attempting inference about many forms of human behaviour from cross-sectional data. Simulations are used to confirm that cross-sectional analyses can produce seriously misleading results. The problems are avoided by using longitudinal methods.

Suggested Citation

  • R B Davies & A R Pickles, 1985. "Longitudinal versus Cross-Sectional Methods for Behavioural Research: A First-Round Knockout," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 17(10), pages 1315-1329, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:17:y:1985:i:10:p:1315-1329
    DOI: 10.1068/a171315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a171315
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a171315?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davies, Richard B. & Crouchley, Robert, 1984. "Calibrating longitudinal models of residential mobility and migration An assessment of a non-parametric marginal likelihood approach," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 231-247, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McClain, Verena & Waldorf, Brigitte, 2017. "Borrowing From The Demographer's Toolbox: Longitudinal Methods in Regional Science," Working papers 264970, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Wissen, Leo J., 1990. "Simultaneous Equation Systems Involving Binary Choice Variables," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt339562gx, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Grzeskowiak, Stephan & Sirgy, M. Joseph & Widgery, Robin, 2003. "Residents' Satisfaction with Community Services: Predictors and Outcomes," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 33(2), pages 1-36.
    3. Wissen, L.J.G. & Bonnerman, F., 1991. "A dynamic model of simultaneous migration and labour market behaviour," Serie Research Memoranda 0020, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    4. van Wissen, Leo J. & Golob, Thomas F., 1990. "Simultaneous Equation Systems Involving Binary Choice Variables," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5t28k04n, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Richard B. Davies & Robert Crouchley, 1986. "The Mover-Stayer Model," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 14(4), pages 356-380, May.
    6. Richard Davies & Andrew Pickles, 1986. "Accounting for omitted variables in a discrete time panel data model of residential mobility," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 219-233, June.
    7. Henley, A, "undated". "Residential Mobility, Housing Wealth and the Labour Market," Discussion Papers 9615, Department of Economics, University of Wales, Aberystwyth.
    8. Kettunen, Juha, 1997. "Education and unemployment duration," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 163-170, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:17:y:1985:i:10:p:1315-1329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.