IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v587y2003i1p180-207.html

Standards for Evidence and Evidence for Standards: The Case of School-Based Drug Prevention

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Petrosino

    (Study on Decisions in Education at Harvard; Center for Evaluation at the American Academy of Arts & Sciences; Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group)

Abstract

The Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group continues to focus on issues of evidence: what studies count in a systematic review and how many studies are needed to claim an intervention works. They are not alone. Since the mid-1990s, a number of similar efforts have sprung up to provide guidance to policy makers who wish to adopt programs to prevent violence or drug use. Many of these are particularly relevant to school-based drug prevention programs. This article describes seven efforts to produce guides to research-based programs, focusing on the standards adopted to determine what evidence counts and how much of it is necessary to determine that it worked. The author concludes with a discussion of some of the issues raised by this review.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Petrosino, 2003. "Standards for Evidence and Evidence for Standards: The Case of School-Based Drug Prevention," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 180-207, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:587:y:2003:i:1:p:180-207
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716203251218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716203251218
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716203251218?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David P. Farrington, 2003. "Methodological Quality Standards for Evaluation Research," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 49-68, May.
    2. Mark W. Lipsey, 2003. "Those Confounded Moderators in Meta-Analysis: Good, Bad, and Ugly," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 69-81, May.
    3. Ennett, S.T. & Tobler, N.S. & Ringwalt, C.L. & Flewelling, R.L., 1994. "How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of project DARE outcome evaluations," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 84(9), pages 1394-1401.
    4. David B. Wilson & Denise C. Gottfredson & Stacy S. Najaka, 2001. "School-Based Prevention of Problem Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 247-272, September.
    5. David Weisburd & Cynthia M. Lum & Sue-Ming Yang, 2003. "When can we Conclude that Treatments or Programs “Don’t Work†?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 31-48, May.
    6. Gorman, D. M., 2002. "Defining and operationalizing `research-based' prevention: a critique (with case studies) of the US Department of Education's Safe, Disciplined and Drug-Free Schools Exemplary Programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 295-302, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Friedrich Lösel & Andreas Beelmann, 2003. "Effects of Child Skills Training in Preventing Antisocial Behavior: A Systematic Review of Randomized Evaluations," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 84-109, May.
    2. Richard L. Dukes & Judith A. Stein & Jodie B. Ullman, 1997. "Long-Term Impact of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E," Evaluation Review, , vol. 21(4), pages 483-500, August.
    3. Kevin N. Griffith & Lawrence M. Scheier, 2013. "Did We Get Our Money’s Worth? Bridging Economic and Behavioral Measures of Program Success in Adolescent Drug Prevention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, November.
    4. Benjamin W. Fisher & Anthony Petrosino & Hannah Sutherland & Sarah Guckenburg & Trevor Fronius & Ivan Benitez & Kevin Earl, 2023. "School‐based law enforcement strategies to reduce crime, increase perceptions of safety, and improve learning outcomes in primary and secondary schools: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), December.
    5. Anderson, D. Mark, 2010. "Does information matter? The effect of the Meth Project on meth use among youths," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 732-742, September.
    6. Chad Nye & Jamie Schwartz & Herb Turner, 2005. "PROTOCOL: The Effectiveness of Parental Involvement for Improving the Academic Performance of Elementary School Children," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19.
    7. Anderson, D. Mark & Rees, Daniel I., 2015. "Per se drugged driving laws and traffic fatalities," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 122-134.
    8. Michael Wolfowicz & Yael Litmanovitz & David Weisburd & Badi Hasisi, 2020. "A Field-Wide Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Putative Risk and Protective Factors for Radicalization Outcomes," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 407-447, September.
    9. Richard F. Catalano & M. Lisa Berglund & Jean A. M. Ryan & Heather S. Lonczak & J. David Hawkins, 2004. "Positive Youth Development in the United States: Research Findings on Evaluations of Positive Youth Development Programs," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 591(1), pages 98-124, January.
    10. Joel H. Brown & Marianne D'Emidio Caston, 1995. "On Becoming "At Risk" Through Drug Education," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(4), pages 451-491, August.
    11. Andrés Raineri Bernain, 2001. "Desarrollo De Habilidades Psicosociales En Ejecutivos: Una Revision De La Literatura," Abante, Escuela de Administracion. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 4(2), pages 157-192.
    12. Ali Katebi & Mohammad Hossain HajiZadeh & Ali Bordbar & Amir Masoud Salehi, 2022. "The Relationship Between “Job Satisfaction” and “Job Performance”: A Meta-analysis," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(1), pages 21-42, March.
    13. Kelley, Allyson & Fatupaito, Bethany & Witzel, Morgan, 2018. "Is culturally based prevention effective? Results from a 3-year tribal substance use prevention program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 28-35.
    14. Richard L. Dukes & Jodie B . Ullman & Judith A. Stein, 1996. "Three-Year Follow-Up of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.)," Evaluation Review, , vol. 20(1), pages 49-66, February.
    15. Gorman, Dennis M. & Conde, Eugenia, 2007. "Conflict of interest in the evaluation and dissemination of "model" school-based drug and violence prevention programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 422-429, November.
    16. David P. Farrington, 2003. "British Randomized Experiments on Crime and Justice," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 589(1), pages 150-167, September.
    17. David Weisburd & Cynthia M. Lum & Sue-Ming Yang, 2003. "When can we Conclude that Treatments or Programs “Don’t Work†?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 31-48, May.
    18. Richard L. Dukes & Jodie B. Ullman & Judith A. Stein, 1995. "An Evaluation of D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education), Using a Solomon Four-Group Design With Latent Variables," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(4), pages 409-435, August.
    19. Soohyun Yi & Nathalie Duval-Couetil, 2022. "Standards for Evaluating Impact in Entrepreneurship Education Research: Using a Descriptive Validity Framework to Enhance Methodological Rigor and Transparency," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(6), pages 1685-1716, November.
    20. Joel H. Brown & Ita G.G. Kreft, 1998. "Introduction To the Special Issue," Evaluation Review, , vol. 22(1), pages 3-14, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:587:y:2003:i:1:p:180-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.