IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/amerec/v56y2011i1p13-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty and the Policy Analyst

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Cate

Abstract

The paper reviews JNK's examination of the scope and method of political economy, suggests that Friedman's re-examination of JNK's pronouncements on methodology resulted in two problems (a) the over emphasis of positive science at the expense of the art of political economy (hereafter applied economics), and (b) the coupling of the positive science of political economy to laissez faire in the face of JNK's warning, argues that JMK used applied economic models based on the needs of the British economy in his books as the basis for his pragmatic public policy proposals, and concludes that, beginning with the Principles courses the profession must do a better job of (1) explaining the differences among positive science, normative science, and applied economics. (2) recruiting more students into economics in general and into applied economics in particular. (3) shifting resources away from positive science to applied economics, and (4) explaining ourselves to the general voter.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Cate, 2011. "Uncertainty and the Policy Analyst," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 56(1), pages 13-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:amerec:v:56:y:2011:i:1:p:13-19
    DOI: 10.1177/056943451105600103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/056943451105600103
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/056943451105600103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmen M. Reinhart & Kenneth S. Rogoff, 2009. "Varieties of Crises and Their Dates," Introductory Chapters, in: This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly, Princeton University Press.
    2. Keynes, John Neville, 1890. "The Scope and Method of Political Economy," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, edition 4, number keynes1890.
    3. Kydland, Finn E & Prescott, Edward C, 1977. "Rules Rather Than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 85(3), pages 473-491, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clément Fontan & François Claveau & Peter Dietsch, 2016. "Central banking and inequalities," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 15(4), pages 319-357, November.
    2. Buiter, Willem, 2014. "Central Banks: Powerful, Political and Unaccountable?," CEPR Discussion Papers 10223, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Kern, Andreas & Reinsberg, Bernhard & Rau-Göhring, Matthias, 2019. "IMF conditionality and central bank independence," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 212-229.
    4. Hans Gersbach & Volker Hahn, 2011. "Modeling Two Macro Policy Instruments - Interest Rates and Aggregate Capital Requirements," CESifo Working Paper Series 3598, CESifo.
    5. William R. White, 2013. "Is Monetary Policy a Science? The Interaction of Theory and Practice over the Last 50 Years," SUERF 50th Anniversary Volume Chapters, in: Morten Balling & Ernest Gnan (ed.), 50 Years of Money and Finance: Lessons and Challenges, chapter 3, pages 73-116, SUERF - The European Money and Finance Forum.
    6. William Roberts Clark & Vincent Arel-Bundock, 2013. "Independent but Not Indifferent: Partisan Bias in Monetary Policy at the Fed," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Jose A Lopez & Kris James Mitchener, 2021. "Uncertainty and Hyperinflation: European Inflation Dynamics after World War I [Modeling and forecasting realized volatility]," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(633), pages 450-475.
    8. Salter, Alexander William & Tarko, Vlad, 2017. "Polycentric banking and macroeconomic stability," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 365-395, June.
    9. Falilou Fall & Debra Bloch & Jean-Marc Fournier & Peter Hoeller, 2015. "Prudent debt targets and fiscal frameworks," OECD Economic Policy Papers 15, OECD Publishing.
    10. Magas, István, 2011. "Muraközy László (szerk.): 20 év múlva, vissza a jövőbe. Akadémiai kiadó, Budapest, 2011, 278 oldal [László Muraközy, ed: 20 év múlva, vissza a jövőbe (In twenty years' time, back to the future)]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 716-721.
    11. Fraccaroli, Nicolò & Sowerbutts, Rhiannon & Whitworth, Andrew, 2020. "Does regulatory and supervisory independence affect financial stability?," Bank of England working papers 893, Bank of England.
    12. Levieuge, Grégory & Lucotte, Yannick & Pradines-Jobet, Florian, 2021. "The cost of banking crises: Does the policy framework matter?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    13. Cachanosky, Nicolás & Salter, Alexander W. & Savanti, Ignacio, 2022. "Can dollarization constrain a populist leader? The case of Rafael Correa in Ecuador," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 430-442.
    14. Homburg, Stefan, 2017. "A Study in Monetary Macroeconomics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198807537, Decembrie.
    15. Daniel Gros & Sam Langfield & Marco Pagano & Dirk Schoenmaker, 2014. "Allocating macro-prudential powers," Report of the Advisory Scientific Committee 5, European Systemic Risk Board.
    16. Axelle Arquié & Jérôme Héricourt & Fabien Tripier, 2020. "Covid-19: Has the Time Come for Mainstream Macroeconomics to Rehabilitate Money Printing?," CEPII Policy Brief 2020-31, CEPII research center.
    17. repec:bap:eebook:02 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Issing, Otmar, 2012. "Central banks: Paradise lost," CFS Working Paper Series 2012/06, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    19. Karl Whelan, 2019. "The Euro at 20: Successes, Problems, Progress and Threats," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 50(4), pages 725-750.
    20. Tomasz Kamil Michalski & Guillaume Stoltz, 2010. "Do countries falsify economic date strategically? Some evidence that they do," Working Papers hal-00540794, HAL.
    21. Claudio Borio, 2011. "Central banking post-crisis: What compass for uncharted waters?," BIS Working Papers 353, Bank for International Settlements.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:amerec:v:56:y:2011:i:1:p:13-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/aex .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.