Macro-prudential Instruments in Eastern European and Balkan Countries
As most of the countries around the world, even in Eastern Europe it became necessary to implement the policy and macro-prudential instruments. The measures adopted by the authorities varied and they consisted in controlling the banksâ€™ loans issued in the foreign currency. Foreign currency lending was the main feature which was strengthened even more during the credit boom of the past decade. The policymakers in the region were clear about the need for development of the capital markets in local currency, in such a way that banks were to shrink for foreign currency funding and long-term maturities. It is obvious that macro-prudential instruments and policies varied amongst countries. This is due to the fact that each country has different problems of the macroeconomic nature and in the financial system. According to the report of IMF (2011b) when applying macro-prudential instruments should be noted that the same measures are not equally effective in all countries where they are applied. The instruments used have had a positive effect, namely the reduction of lending and liquidity coverage. It is important to realize that the degree of effectiveness of instruments does not depend on the stage of economic development or the exchange rate. So, the emerging economies that have fixed exchange rate and limited interest rate tend to use macro-prudential instruments. The same tools are equally effective when used in developed countries with flexible exchange rate regimes. The implementation of macro-prudential instruments costs that must be taken into account when calculating the benefits from these instruments (IMF, 2011a). The liquidity instruments that are used in Eastern European countries demonstrated that they were effective in limiting the financing in foreign currency. In this context, the instruments relating to capital may be helpful for limiting the credit growth (IMF, 2011b).
Volume (Year): 10 (2015)
Issue (Month): 2 (December)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Bucharest, 6th district, 47 Fabricii Street, Quadra Place, bl.J, fl.1, ap.12|
Web page: http://www.reaser.eu/pgsa/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Mishkin, F S., 2008. "How should we respond to asset price bubbles?," Financial Stability Review, Banque de France, issue 12, pages 65-74, October.
- Frederic S. Mishkin, 2011. "Monetary Policy Strategy: Lessons from the Crisis," NBER Working Papers 16755, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rse:wpaper:v:10:y:2015:i:2:p:58-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Manuela Epure)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.