IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v9y2015i1p885-892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Value Of Benefits For Project Managers Compensation

Author

Listed:
  • Razvan NISTOR
  • Ioana BELEIU
  • Marius RADU

Abstract

The article examines how the project manager role characteristics are perceived, valued and promoted by the key recruitment stakeholders - managers, entrepreneurs, recruiters or head-hunters - during their discussions in project initiation phase with the candidates for managing positions. In our research, we aim to understand the differences between the stakeholders perceptions involved in the project manager selection and ongoing compensation discussion. We used log-linear preference model based on paired comparisons and rankings. Also, we used mean comparisons of the scores of project managers roles attributes ranked by respondents from different industries (IT and construction) and with different organizational role (Management and Recruitment). Findings - The importance of the research is that it adds to the understanding of project managers’ incentives and compensation. Also, it brings attention to the perceived value of the project roles attributes and the importance of the behavioral elements in project decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Razvan NISTOR & Ioana BELEIU & Marius RADU, 2015. "Perceived Value Of Benefits For Project Managers Compensation," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 885-892, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:885-892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conference.management.ase.ro/archives/2015/pdf/94.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dittrich, R. & Hatzinger, R. & Katzenbeisser, W., 2002. "Modelling dependencies in paired comparison data: A log-linear approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 39-57, July.
    2. João Vieito & Walayet Khan, 2012. "Executive compensation and gender: S&P 1500 listed firms," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 36(2), pages 371-399, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandra Grand & Regina Dittrich & Brian Francis, 2015. "Markov models of dependence in longitudinal paired comparisons: an application to course design," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 99(2), pages 237-257, April.
    2. Joyce C. Wang & Lívia Markóczy & Sunny Li Sun & Mike W. Peng, 2019. "She’-E-O Compensation Gap: A Role Congruity View," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 745-760, October.
    3. Bugeja, Martin & Matolcsy, Zoltan P. & Spiropoulos, Helen, 2012. "Is there a gender gap in CEO compensation?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 849-859.
    4. Mohan, Nancy, 2014. "A review of the gender effect on pay, corporate performance and entry into top management," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 41-51.
    5. Dittrich, Regina & Francis, Brian & Hatzinger, Reinhold & Katzenbeisser, Walter, 2006. "Modelling dependency in multivariate paired comparisons: A log-linear approach," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 197-209, September.
    6. Canil, Jean & Karpavičius, Sigitas & Yu, Chia-Feng, 2019. "Are shareholders gender neutral? Evidence from say on pay," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 169-186.
    7. J. Samuel Baixauli-Soler & Maria Belda-Ruiz & Gregorio Sanchez-Marin, 2017. "An executive hierarchy analysis of stock options: Does gender matter?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 737-766, October.
    8. Tomas Havranek & Anna Sokolova, 2016. "Do Consumers Really Follow a Rule of Thumb? Three Thousand Estimates from 130 Studies Say "Probably Not"," Working Papers 2016/08, Czech National Bank.
    9. Javakhadze, David & Shelton, Austin, 2022. "Executive social connections and gender pay gaps," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    10. Olivia Hebner & Courtney Collins & Franklin Mixon, 2018. "Do Gender and Race Play a Role in the Compensation of University Presidents? Evidence from Institution-level Panel Data," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 21(1), pages 1-20.
    11. Luisa Esteban-Salvador & Ana F. Gargallo-Castel, 2019. "Female Executives in the Service Sector: The Case of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Manuela Cattelan & Cristiano Varin, 2013. "Hybrid Pairwise Likelihood Analysis of Animal Behavior Experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 1002-1011, December.
    13. Baixauli-Soler, J. Samuel & Belda-Ruiz, Maria & Sanchez-Marin, Gregorio, 2015. "Executive stock options, gender diversity in the top management team, and firm risk taking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 451-463.
    14. Susana Alvarez-Diez & J. Samuel Baixauli-Soler & Maria Belda-Ruiz, 2016. "Early Exercise Behaviour in Performance-vested Stock Option Grants," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 17(1), pages 55-78, May.
    15. N. Chambers & G. Harvey & R. Mannion, 2017. "Who should serve on health care boards? What should they do and how should they behave? A fresh look at the literature and the evidence," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1357348-135, January.
    16. Francis, Bill B. & Hasan, Iftekhar & Hovakimian, Gayane & Sharma, Zenu, 2023. "Gender pay gap in American CFOs: Theory and evidence," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    17. Damiani, Mirella & Ricci, Andrea, 2015. "Gender earnings differentials and pay structure of Italian family managers," MPRA Paper 61429, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Franziska Handschumacher-Knors, 2023. "Does a gender pay gap exist on executive boards? An empirical multilevel analysis of executive board compensation in German listed companies," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(3), pages 325-357, April.
    19. Duong, Lien & Evans, John, 2016. "Gender differences in compensation and earnings management: Evidence from Australian CFOs," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(PA), pages 17-35.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:885-892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.