IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v9y2015i1p1-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defining A Spectrum For Strategic Thinking

Author

Listed:
  • Constantin BRATIANU

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the nature of strategic thinking and to construct a spectrum for it made of monochromatic thinking models. I design a framework defined by four basic dimensions which come from the nature of the future. These dimensions are: time, complexity, uncertainty, and innovation. For each dimension I define three basic monochromatic thinking models and specify for each of them the main feature. Then, I analyze each model capability of describing events and phenomena from the future and decide if it fits or not into the spectrum of strategic thinking. The main idea of this paper is based on the metaphor of the property of white light to be decomposed by a prism into a spectrum of monochromatic colors. That means that strategic thinking is a rather complex mental phenomenon that can be decomposed into a spectrum of simple monochromatic thinking models. All of these thinking models co-exist in our mind more or less, but only some of them are fitted for being a part of the strategic thinking spectrum.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantin BRATIANU, 2015. "Defining A Spectrum For Strategic Thinking," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:1-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://conference.management.ase.ro/archives/2015/pdf/1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Constantin BRATIANU & Ivona ORZEA, 2010. "Organizational knowledge creation," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 5(3), Autumn.
    2. Kevin Groves & Charles Vance & Yongsun Paik, 2008. "Linking Linear/Nonlinear Thinking Style Balance and Managerial Ethical Decision-Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 305-325, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.