IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/bemann/v15y2025i5p58-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students’ Preparedness For Digital Pedagogy In A Disadvantaged Higher Education Institution In South Africa: Kirkpatrick'S Evaluation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Sandiso NGCOBO

    (Mangosuthu University of Technology, Durban, South Africa)

  • Alfred Mvunyelwa MSOMI

    (Mangosuthu University of Technology, Durban, South Africa)

Abstract

Contemporary youth are frequently characterized as "digital natives" due to their perceived technological proficiency in the artificial intelligence age. This has driven educational institutions to integrate technology into their pedagogical approaches, either fully or in a blended format. However, the current body of research lacks investigation into the impact of self-training, schooling and that provided during orientation at university on students’ preparedness for digital education. Available studies have focused on teachers and workers in the corporate environment. To close the gap, this study adopted the Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model (KEM) to assess students’ preparedness for the use of Learning Management System (LMS) platforms, such as Blackboard. A closed-response online questionnaire, hosted on Google's platform, formed the basis of data collection from 424 participants at the beginning of the 2025 academic year in a South African university of technology designated as historically disadvantaged institution. The data indicate that, while some participants exhibit technological preparedness and literacy, a significant number equally require substantial training support exceeding the scope of standard university orientation. This imbalance is because of varying students’ schooling and socio-economic backgrounds, which would have disadvantaged students coming from rural areas. The diversity in the technological preparation of new students highlights the critical need for universities to enhance students' technological skills, without generalising their background preparedness, for students’ access and success with artificial intelligence tools as they transition to higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandiso NGCOBO & Alfred Mvunyelwa MSOMI, 2025. "Students’ Preparedness For Digital Pedagogy In A Disadvantaged Higher Education Institution In South Africa: Kirkpatrick'S Evaluation Model," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(5), pages 58-68, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:bemann:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:58-68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://beman.ase.ro/special_issue_5/6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peres, Renana & Schreier, Martin & Schweidel, David & Sorescu, Alina, 2023. "On ChatGPT and beyond: How generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 269-275.
    2. Ana-Maria ÈšUCA & Gabriela PRELIPCEAN, 2024. "The Relationship Between Ai And Labor Productivity €“ Myth Or Reality," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(4), pages 43-58, December.
    3. Richard Heeks, 2022. "Digital inequality beyond the digital divide: conceptualizing adverse digital incorporation in the global South," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 688-704, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robertson, Jeandri & Ferreira, Caitlin & Botha, Elsamari & Oosthuizen, Kim, 2024. "Game changers: A generative AI prompt protocol to enhance human-AI knowledge co-construction," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 499-510.
    2. Andrew Delios & Rosalie L. Tung & Arjen Witteloostuijn, 2025. "How to intelligently embrace generative AI: the first guardrails for the use of GenAI in IB research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 56(4), pages 451-460, June.
    3. Makoza, Frank, 2023. "Analyzing policy change of Malawi ICT and Digitalization policy: Policy Assemblage Perspective," EconStor Preprints 273309, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    4. Arpan Kumar Kar & P. S. Varsha & Shivakami Rajan, 2023. "Unravelling the Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) in Industrial Applications: A Review of Scientific and Grey Literature," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(4), pages 659-689, December.
    5. Celiktutan, Begum & Klesse, Anne-Kathrin & Tuk, Mirjam A., 2024. "Acceptability lies in the eye of the beholder: Self-other biases in GenAI collaborations," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 496-512.
    6. Acar, Oguz A., 2024. "Commentary: Reimagining marketing education in the age of generative AI," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 489-495.
    7. Elizondo-Candanedo, Raúl F. & Arranz-López, Aldo & Soria-Lara, Julio A. & Páez, Antonio, 2024. "When e-activities meet spatial accessibility: A theoretical framework and empirical space-time thresholds for simulated spatial settings," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    8. Damien Girollet, 2024. "Digital divides among microenterprises: Evidence from sub‐Saharan Africa," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 1350-1380, March.
    9. Kirshner, Samuel N., 2024. "GPT and CLT: The impact of ChatGPT's level of abstraction on consumer recommendations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Hoffmann, Stefan & Lasarov, Wassili & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2024. "AI-empowered scale development: Testing the potential of ChatGPT," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    11. Hartmann, Jochen & Exner, Yannick & Domdey, Samuel, 2025. "The power of generative marketing: Can generative AI create superhuman visual marketing content?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 13-31.
    12. Madon, Shirin & Masiero, Silvia, 2025. "Digital connectivity and the SDGs: Conceptualising the link through an institutional resilience lens," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    13. Modgil, Sachin & Gupta, Shivam & Kar, Arpan Kumar & Tuunanen, Tuure, 2025. "How could Generative AI support and add value to non-technology companies – A qualitative study," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    14. Subekti Priyadharma, 2024. "“Periphery-Centric” Approach as a Tactic for Everyday Digital In- and Exclusion of Indonesian Villages," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    15. Khizar, Hafiz Muhammad Usman & Ashraf, Aqsa & Yuan, Jingbo & Al-Waqfi, Mohammed, 2025. "Insights into ChatGPT adoption (or resistance) in research practices: The behavioral reasoning perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    16. wael AL-khatib, Ayman, 2023. "Drivers of generative artificial intelligence to fostering exploitative and exploratory innovation: A TOE framework," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    17. Sklenarz, Felix Anton & Edeling, Alexander & Himme, Alexander & Wichmann, Julian R.K., 2024. "Does bigger still mean better? How digital transformation affects the market share–profitability relationship," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 648-670.
    18. Wu, Qinqin & Zhuang, Qinqin & Liu, Yitong & Han, Longyan, 2024. "Technology shock of ChatGPT, social attention and firm value: Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. David Fehrenbach & Carolina Herrando & María José Martín-De Hoyos, 2024. "Co-Creation with AI in B2B Markets: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    20. Wang, Haibo, 2024. "Decoding herding dynamics in the generative AI investment amid key technological advancements: A timeline perspective," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:bemann:v:15:y:2025:i:5:p:58-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zamfir Andreea (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.