IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/rupeas/rps2313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-scale typology of rural areas under the post-Soviet transformations (on the example of the Tambov Region)
[Полимасштабная Типология Сельской Местности В Условиях Постсоветских Трансформаций (На Примере Тамбовской Области)]

Author

Listed:
  • Prusikhin, Oleg (Прусихин, Олег)

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University)

  • Krutov, Oleg (Крутов, Олег)

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University)

  • Vorobiev, Maxim (Воробьев, Максим)

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University)

  • Loktionov, Kirill (Локтионов, Кирилл)

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University)

  • Vepritsky, Alexander (Веприцкий, Александр)

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University)

  • Alekseev, Alexander (Алексеев, Александр)

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University)

Abstract

Russian countryside is heterogeneous, and in the post-Soviet period, this heterogeneity has increased. Moreover, the image of the countryside in the perception of the authorities and society is far from reality, which leads to the mistakes in the assessment of its condition and prospects. Russian scholars usually study the northern countryside and ethnic republics, while the studies of the Russian steppe regions are less common. The authors consider the factors of the rural territorial differentiation under the post-Soviet transformations in one of the most homogeneous steppe regions — Tambov — at the level of municipal districts and rural settlements. The suggested typology of districts is based on the statistical indicators which reflect changes in the intensity of territorial development in the last thirty years; and the typology of settlements is based on 53 interviews and observations during the expedition to the Michurinsky, Gavrilovsky and Uvarovsky districts in the summer of 2022. The authors conclude that the natural factor still determines the intensity of transformations both directly (higher intensification of crop production in the south) and indirectly (through the settlement and transportation system). The influence of the economic-geographical position (proximity to cities) and of the institutional factor (large investors are interested in unallocated land) is also significant.

Suggested Citation

  • Prusikhin, Oleg (Прусихин, Олег) & Krutov, Oleg (Крутов, Олег) & Vorobiev, Maxim (Воробьев, Максим) & Loktionov, Kirill (Локтионов, Кирилл) & Vepritsky, Alexander (Веприцкий, Александр) & Alekseev, Al, 2023. "A multi-scale typology of rural areas under the post-Soviet transformations (on the example of the Tambov Region) [Полимасштабная Типология Сельской Местности В Условиях Постсоветских Трансформаций," Russian Peasant Studies, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 8, pages 64-103.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:rupeas:rps2313
    DOI: 10.22394/2500-1809-2023-8-2-64-103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/rupeas/rps2313.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22394/2500-1809-2023-8-2-64-103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris Ballas & Thanasis Kalogeresis & Lois Labrianidis, 2003. "A comparative study of typologies for rural areas in Europe," ERSA conference papers ersa03p515, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Vicente Ruiz & Lewis Dijkstra, 2011. "Refinement of the OECD regional typology: Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1650, European Regional Science Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ángela Engelmo Moriche & Ana Nieto Masot & Julián Mora Aliseda, 2021. "Economic Sustainability of Touristic Offer Funded by Public Initiatives in Spanish Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Francisco José Goerlich Gisbert & Isidro Cantarino Martí, 2013. "Redefiniendo ciudades," Working Papers. Serie EC 2013-06, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    3. Viñas Carmen Delgado, 2019. "Depopulation Processes in European Rural Areas: A Case Study of Cantabria (Spain)," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(3), pages 341-369, September.
    4. Lukić Aleksandar, 2013. "Tourism, Farm Diversification and Plurality of Rurality: Case Study of Croatia," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 5(4), pages 356-376, December.
    5. Mieczysław Adamowicz, 2021. "The Potential for Innovative and Smart Rural Development in the Peripheral Regions of Eastern Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, February.
    6. Roman Römisch & Peter Huber & Klaus Nowotny & Ulrike Strauss, 2011. "CENTROPE Regional Development Report. Focus on Spatial Integration," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 43885.
    7. Monika Stanny & Łukasz Komorowski & Andrzej Rosner, 2021. "The Socio-Economic Heterogeneity of Rural Areas: Towards a Rural Typology of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Paolo Veneri & Vicente Ruiz, 2016. "Urban-To-Rural Population Growth Linkages: Evidence From Oecd Tl3 Regions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 3-24, January.
    9. Peter Nijkamp & Tuzin Baycan Levent & Aliye Ahu Gulumser, 2006. "Turkey's Rurality: A Comparative Analysis At the EU Level," ERSA conference papers ersa06p641, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Pienaar, Louw & Traub, Lulama, 2015. "Understanding the smallholder farmer in South Africa: Towards a sustainable livelihoods classification," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212633, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Marija Drobnjaković & Milena Panić, 2024. "Introduction of the Approach for Reviving the Sub-Municipal Level as a Spatial Aspect of Decentralization in Serbia," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Patrícia C. Melo & Conceição Rego & Paulo R. Anciães & Nuno Guiomar & José Muñoz‐Rojas, 2022. "Does road accessibility to cities support rural population growth? Evidence for Portugal between 1991 and 2011," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 443-470, March.
    13. Klimanek Tomasz & Filas-Przybył Sylwia, 2019. "The Impact Of The Applied Typology On The Statistical Picture Of Population Ageing In Urban Areas In Poland – A Comparative Analysis," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 20(4), pages 135-152, December.
    14. Braga Gustavo Bastos & de Carvalho Fiúza Ana Louise & Remoaldo Paula Cristina, 2018. "Eurostat methodology applied to the characterization of rural and urban Brazilian spaces," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 42(42), pages 151-162, December.
    15. Carmen Delgado-Viñas & María-Luisa Gómez-Moreno, 2022. "The Interaction between Urban and Rural Areas: An Updated Paradigmatic, Methodological and Bibliographic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Hogyeong Jeong & Yeeun Shin & Sang-woo Lee & Seokjun Han & Kyungjin An, 2025. "Identifying Local Characteristics for Customized Policy Application Within Rural Areas Using LDA Topic Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Tagesse A. Melketo & Endrias Geta & Stefan Sieber, 2021. "Understanding Livelihood Diversification Patterns among Smallholder Farm Households in Southern Ethiopia," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, December.
    18. Camaioni, Beatrice & Esposti, Roberto & Lobianco, Antonello & Pagliacci, Francesco & Sotte, Franco, 2013. "How rural is the EU RDP? An analysis through spatial fund allocation," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 2(3), pages 1-24, December.
    19. Depraz, Samuel, 2008. "Czy Powstanie Międzynarodowa Definicja Obszaru Wiejskiego W Europie?," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 2(139).
    20. Chris McDonald & Lorena Figueiredo, 2022. "A Framework for Comparative Assessment of Indigenous Land Governance," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:rupeas:rps2313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.