IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5332-d1675139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Local Characteristics for Customized Policy Application Within Rural Areas Using LDA Topic Modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Hogyeong Jeong

    (Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)

  • Yeeun Shin

    (Laboratory of Spatial Design Research, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)

  • Sang-woo Lee

    (Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)

  • Seokjun Han

    (HIGHDATA, Seoul 05836, Republic of Korea)

  • Kyungjin An

    (Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Rural plans incorporating regional identity are vital for fostering regional revitalization and offering viable policy alternatives. The need for a systematic approach that recognizes both the diversity and shared characteristics of rural areas has become increasingly clear. Although numerous studies have explored rural classification, research examining specific regional characteristics remains limited. Hence, this study aimed to establish a comprehensive standard for developing effective rural plans. To this end, a study was conducted to classify the characteristics of rural areas using topic modeling, which is a text-mining algorithm. An analysis of publications on rural revitalization projects in Korea over the past decade revealed five common factors of success themes across each region. The five success factors, “local cultural experience”, “environment and landscape utilization”, “community activation”, “regional infrastructure development”, and “local economic activation”, should be considered in rural areas with different characteristics when establishing rural plans and policies. This classification of success factors serves as the foundation for establishing rural plans and policies. By applying different weights to the five success factors according to the unique characteristics and conditions of each region, it would open a great number of possibilities to establish more precise and effective customized plans. Future research is required to provide more empirical and broadly applicable results based on the classification framework proposed in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Hogyeong Jeong & Yeeun Shin & Sang-woo Lee & Seokjun Han & Kyungjin An, 2025. "Identifying Local Characteristics for Customized Policy Application Within Rural Areas Using LDA Topic Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5332-:d:1675139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5332/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5332/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Dax & Michael Fischer, 2018. "An alternative policy approach to rural development in regions facing population decline," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 297-315, February.
    2. Marco Rossetti & Fabio Stella & Markus Zanker, 2016. "Analyzing user reviews in tourism with topic models," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 5-21, March.
    3. Alberto Arenal & Claudio Feijoo & Ana Moreno & Sergio Ramos & Cristina Armuña, 2021. "Entrepreneurship Policy Agenda in the European Union: A Text Mining Perspective," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(2), pages 243-271, March.
    4. Wang, Jieyong & Qu, Lulu & Li, Yurui & Feng, Weilun, 2023. "Identifying the structure of rural regional system and implications for rural revitalization: A case study of Yanchi County in northern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    5. Wenqi Li & Li Zhang & Inhee Lee & Menelaos Gkartzios, 2023. "Overview of Social Policies for Town and Village Development in Response to Rural Shrinkage in East Asia: The Cases of Japan, South Korea and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Cattivelli, Valentina, 2021. "Methods for the identification of urban, rural and peri-urban areas in Europe: An overview," Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 14(3), pages 240-246, March.
    7. Adamowicz, Mieczysław & Zwolińska-Ligaj, Magdalena, 2018. "New Concepts For Rural Development In The Strategies And Policies Of The European Union," Economic and Regional Studies (Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne), John Paul II University of Applied Sciences in Biala Podlaska, vol. 11(3), September.
    8. Zhang, Qian & Webster, Natasha A. & Han, Shengnan & Ayele, Workneh Yilma, 2023. "Contextualizing the rural in digital studies: A computational literature review of rural-digital relations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. De Toni, Andrea & Di Martino, Paolo & Dax, Thomas, 2021. "Location matters. Are science and policy arenas facing the Inner Peripheries challenges in EU?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    10. I-Cheng Chang & Jeou-Shyan Horng & Chih-Hsing Liu & Sheng-Fang Chou & Tai-Yi Yu, 2022. "Exploration of Topic Classification in the Tourism Field with Text Mining Technology—A Case Study of the Academic Journal Papers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    11. David Doloreux & Jose Gaviria de la Puerta & Iker Pastor-López & Igone Porto Gómez & Borja Sanz & Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, 2019. "Territorial innovation models: to be or not to be, that’s the question," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(3), pages 1163-1191, September.
    12. Monica Brezzi & Lewis Dijkstra & Vicente Ruiz, 2011. "OECD Extended Regional Typology: The Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions," OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2011/6, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mieczysław Adamowicz, 2021. "The Potential for Innovative and Smart Rural Development in the Peripheral Regions of Eastern Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, February.
    2. Gema Cárdenas Alonso & Ana Nieto Masot, 2022. "Mapping the Optimal Rural Areas to Invest in through the LEADER Approach: Case Study—Extremadura (SW Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Francisco José Goerlich Gisbert & Isidro Cantarino Martí, 2013. "Redefiniendo ciudades," Working Papers. Serie EC 2013-06, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    4. Baxter, Jamie Scott & Chatzichristos, Georgios & Christmann, Gabriela & Hennebry, Barraí & Kovanen, Sunna & Novikova, Marina & Olmedo, Lucas & Stoustrup, Sune W. & van Twuijver, Mara & Umantseva, Anna, 2020. "Social Enterprises in Structurally Weak Rural Regions: Innovative Troubleshooters in Action. Handbook for Practitioners," IRS Dialog 6/2020, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    5. Julia Neidhardt & Nataliia Rümmele & Hannes Werthner, 0. "Predicting happiness: user interactions and sentiment analysis in an online travel forum," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    6. Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Gabriela Popescu & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2023. "The Impact of Agritourism Activity on the Rural Environment: Findings from an Authentic Agritourist Area—Bukovina, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    7. De Toni, Andrea & Vizzarri, Matteo & Di Febbraro, Mirko & Lasserre, Bruno & Noguera, Joan & Di Martino, Paolo, 2021. "Aligning Inner Peripheries with rural development in Italy: Territorial evidence to support policy contextualization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    8. Zhao, Yu & Li, Yuheng & Liu, Yansui & Yuan, Xuefeng, 2025. "Evolution of rural human-earth system in midstream of China’s Yellow River and its implications for land use planning: A study of Lingbao County, Henan Province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    9. Choi, Hyunhong & Woo, JongRoul, 2022. "Investigating emerging hydrogen technology topics and comparing national level technological focus: Patent analysis using a structural topic model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    10. Monika Stanny & Łukasz Komorowski & Andrzej Rosner, 2021. "The Socio-Economic Heterogeneity of Rural Areas: Towards a Rural Typology of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    11. repec:ags:ijag24:344710 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Yang, Jingluan & Liu, Weidong, 2024. "Knowledge source switching under state interventions of latecomer regions: A case study of Shenzhen," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Paolo Veneri & Vicente Ruiz, 2016. "Urban-To-Rural Population Growth Linkages: Evidence From Oecd Tl3 Regions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 3-24, January.
    14. You Zhou & Yuxin Yao & Zhen Chu & Zheng Lei & Yun Zheng, 2024. "A New Approach to Rural Classification Based on the Filter-Method System: An Empirical Study in Nanning, South China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-25, November.
    15. Sen Lin & Shikun Qin & Li Peng & Xueying Sun & Xiaolu Dou, 2025. "Assessing Geographic Barriers to Access Long-Term Services and Supports in Chengdu, China: A Spatial Accessibility Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-22, April.
    16. Xiaqun Liu & Xiaoyue Qiu & Yaming Zhuang, 2025. "Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Rural Revitalization in China: A Perspective on Symbiosis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Ruohan Tang & Shaofeng Zhao & Won Seok Lee & Sunwoo Park & Yunfei Zhang, 2024. "Crisis Response in Tourism: Semantic Networks and Topic Modeling in the Hotel and Aviation Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-23, December.
    18. Nigel R Curry, 2021. "The rural social economy, community food hubs and the market," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(7-8), pages 569-588, November.
    19. Šťastná Milada & Vaishar Antonín, 2023. "Opportunities for the Development of a Borderland Rural Territory: A Case Study of the Hlučín Region," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 42(4), pages 91-106, December.
    20. Ana Nieto Masot & Gema Cárdenas Alonso & Luis Manuel Costa Moreno, 2019. "Principal Component Analysis of the LEADER Approach (2007–2013) in South Western Europe (Extremadura and Alentejo)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-15, July.
    21. Patrícia C. Melo & Conceição Rego & Paulo R. Anciães & Nuno Guiomar & José Muñoz‐Rojas, 2022. "Does road accessibility to cities support rural population growth? Evidence for Portugal between 1991 and 2011," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 443-470, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5332-:d:1675139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.