IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arjebs/v10y2018i5p7-15.html

Determinants of Risk Behaviour in Livestock Development Programs: Evidence from South Africa's Kaonafatso Yadikgomo (Kyd) Scheme

Author

Listed:
  • Saul Ngarava
  • Abbyssinia Mushunje
  • Amon Taruvinga
  • Peter Mukarumbwa
  • Simbarashe Tatsvarei
  • Ebenezer T Megbowon

Abstract

Risk plays a significant role in input use decisions and production of output in agricultural production. Understanding farmer risk attitudes and their responses to risk is significant in designing effective intervention programmes. Few studies have tried to identify how the introduction of a livestock programme has tended to influence farmer risk profile. The objective of the study was to highlight the determinants of risk behaviour in participants of a livestock development programme. The study was carried out in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Province of South Africa, utilising a purposive sample of 164 respondents who are part of the Kaonafatso Yadikgomo (KYD) Scheme. The cross-sectional survey collected data pertaining to the risk attitudes of the livestock farmers from an attitudinal scale as well as socio-economic and farm biophysical characteristics. Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression were used to analyse the data. The results show that the livestock farmers were risk loving, with the risk attitude being influenced by the age of household head, monthly household income and experience in rearing cattle at the ð‘ < 0.1 level. Furthermore, the source of income, herd size, reason for slaughtering cattle distance to the nearest water source and access to a dip tank had significant influence of attitude towards risk at the ð‘ < 0.05 level. The study concludes that being part of a livestock development programme tends inflto uence the risk attitudes of the participants as the determinants were against a priori expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Saul Ngarava & Abbyssinia Mushunje & Amon Taruvinga & Peter Mukarumbwa & Simbarashe Tatsvarei & Ebenezer T Megbowon, 2018. "Determinants of Risk Behaviour in Livestock Development Programs: Evidence from South Africa's Kaonafatso Yadikgomo (Kyd) Scheme," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 10(5), pages 7-15.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arjebs:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:7-15
    DOI: 10.22610/jebs.v10i5(J).2493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jebs/article/view/2493/1705
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jebs/article/view/2493
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/jebs.v10i5(J).2493?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lagerkvist, Carl Johan, 2005. "Assessing farmers' risk attitudes based on economic, social, personal, and environmental sources of risk: evidence from Sweden," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19361, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Kassie, Menale & Yesuf, Mahmud & Köhlin, Gunnar, 2008. "The Role of Production Risk in Sustainable Land-Management Technology Adoption in the Ethiopian Highlands," RFF Working Paper Series dp-08-15-efd, Resources for the Future.
    3. Kinfe G. Bishu & Seamus O’Reilly & Edward Lahiff & Bodo Steiner, 2018. "Cattle farmers’ perceptions of risk and risk management strategies: evidence from Northern Ethiopia," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 579-598, May.
    4. F. van Winsen & Y. de Mey & L. Lauwers & S. Van Passel & M. Vancauteren & E. Wauters, 2016. "Determinants of risk behaviour: effects of perceived risks and risk attitude on farmer's adoption of risk management strategies," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 56-78, January.
    5. Ashok Mishra & Barry Goodwin, 2006. "Revenue insurance purchase decisions of farmers," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 149-159.
    6. Hurley, Terrance M., "undated". "A review of agricultural production risk in the developing world," Working Papers 188476, HarvestChoice.
    7. Bardhan, Dwaipayan & Dabas, Y.P.S. & Tewari, S.K. & Kumar, Avadhesh, 2006. "An Assessment of Risk Attitude of Dairy Farmers in Uttaranchal (India)," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25259, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Serra, Teresa & Goodwin, Barry K. & Featherstone, Allen M., 2011. "Risk behavior in the presence of government programs," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 162(1), pages 18-24, May.
    9. Gilbert Nartea & Satit Aditto & Christopher Gan, 2012. "Sources of Risk and Risk Management Strategies: The Case of Smallholder Farmers in a Developing Economy," Chapters, in: Nerija Banaitiene (ed.), Risk Management - Current Issues and Challenges, IntechOpen.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feyisa, Ashenafi Duguma & Maertens, Miet & de Mey, Yann, 2023. "Relating risk preferences and risk perceptions over different agricultural risk domains: Insights from Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Claya, Pablo Mac & Accursia, Federico M. & Harmath, Pedro, 2022. "Surviving as an Argentine Farmer: Factors that Influence Risk Management Strategies," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 13(04), December.
    3. Richard Kofi Asravor & Daniel Bruce Sarpong, 2023. "Risk preferences and management strategies of farmers in Ghana: Does the type of crop grown matter?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(6), pages 1080-1098, August.
    4. Zekiye Şengül, 2025. "Analyzing risk perception, risk attitude, and management strategy using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in pistachio production: the case of Siirt Province, Türkiye," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Samuel Sebsibie & Workineh Asmare & Tessema Endalkachew, . "Agricultural Technology Adoption and Rural Poverty: a Study on Smallholders in Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia," Ethiopian Journal of Economics, Ethiopian Economics Association, vol. 23(2).
    6. Xinru Chen & Yuan Jiang & Tianwei Wang & Kexuan Zhou & Jiayi Liu & Huirong Ben & Weidong Wang, 2025. "Enhancing Farmer Resilience Through Agricultural Insurance: Evidence from Jiangsu, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-30, July.
    7. Lotte Yanore & Jaap Sok & Alfons Oude Lansink, 2024. "Do Dutch farmers invest in expansion despite increased policy uncertainty? A participatory Bayesian network approach," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 93-115, January.
    8. Li, Fangfang & He, Dongwei & Liu, Jianghui & Hong, Na, 2025. "Does crop insurance increase farmers’ income? Evidence from the pilot program of agricultural catastrophe insurance in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1002-1019.
    9. Huong, Nguyen & Nanseki, Teruaki, 2015. "Households' Risk Perception of Pig Farming in Vietnam: A Case Study in Quynh Phu District, Thai Binh Province," Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics (formerly Japanese Journal of Rural Economics), Agricultural Economics Society of Japan (AESJ), vol. 17, pages 1-6.
    10. de Brauw, Alan & Eozenou, Patrick, 2014. "Measuring risk attitudes among Mozambican farmers," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 61-74.
    11. Fahad, Shah & Wang, Jing & Hu, Guangyin & Wang, Hui & Yang, Xiaoying & Shah, Ashfaq Ahmad & Huong, Nguyen Thi Lan & Bilal, Arshad, 2018. "Empirical analysis of factors influencing farmers crop insurance decisions in Pakistan: Evidence from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 459-467.
    12. Nataliya Trusova, 2017. "Structure of the Total Financial Potential of Agriculture: Regional Aspect," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 3, pages 119-125, September.
    13. Simone Severini & Cinzia Zinnanti & Valeria Borsellino & Emanuele Schimmenti, 2021. "EU income stabilization tool: potential impacts, financial sustainability and farmer’s risk aversion," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Suresh Kumar & Dharam Raj Singh & Alka Singh & Naveen Prakash Singh & Girish Kumar Jha, 2020. "Does Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Practice Enhance Productivity and Reduce Risk Exposure? Empirical Evidence from Semi-Arid Tropics (SAT), India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    15. repec:oup:apecpp:v:40:y:2018:i:3:p:353-378. is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Marius Michels & Oliver Mußhoff, 2025. "Psychological factors as triggers for futures trading adoption: evidence from German farmers," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. De Salvo, Maria & Capitello, Roberta & Gaudenzi, Barbara & Begalli, Diego, 2019. "Risk management strategies and residual risk perception in the wine industry: A spatial analysis in Northeast Italy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 47-62.
    18. Jiaxu Ling & Yongji Xue & Chenyujing Yang & Yuanyuan Zhang, 2022. "Effect of Farmers’ Awareness of Climate Change on Their Willingness to Adopt Low-Carbon Production: Based on the TAM-SOR Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Raghavendra Kushawaha & Naresh Kumar Sharma, 2025. "Risk behavior among farmers: examining expected utility and prospect theory approach," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 27(1), pages 20-46, April.
    20. Giampietri, Elisa & Yu, Xiaohua & Trestini, Samuele, . "The role of trust and perceived barriers on farmer’s intention to adopt risk management tools," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 9(01).
    21. Boyer, Christopher N. & DeLong, Karen L. & Griffith, Andrew P. & Martinez, Charles, 2024. "Examining how Risk Preferences and Information Affect Livestock Risk Protection Use," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343568, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arjebs:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:7-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jebs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.