The Economics of Timber: A Renewable Resource in the Long Run
Critics of current and historical trends in timber production contend that private owners cut their woods more quickly than optimal while public managers cut their forests more slowly than optimal. Using the Douglas fir industry, this paper shows that private entrepreneurs holding rational expectations with respect to future prices have historically been discounting the future at a real rate of 5 percent -- a much lower rate than that available for other private investments -- and, therefore, that these owners have not cut their forests prematurely. In the case of public management, calculated shadow losses incurred by holding old timber are so great that an appeal to nontimber use values is not sufficient to reconcile management practices. Finally, predictions for the long-term price trends for timber indicate a slowdown in the rate of price increase.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 10 (1979)
Issue (Month): 2 (Autumn)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.rje.org|
|Order Information:||Web: https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/rje_online.cgi|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:10:y:1979:i:autumn:p:447-462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.