IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfh/bbejor/v12y2023i3p352-355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Materialism on Politics: An Examination Through the Lens of Karl Marx's Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Dr. Shahzad Munawar Ch

    (Assistant Professor of Political Science, Higher Education Department, Pakistan)

  • Dr. Muhammad Ahtasham Jan Butt

    (Assistant Professor Higher Education Department, Pakistan)

  • Saira Zaka

    (MPhil research Scholar at University of Okara, Pakistan)

Abstract

Karl Marx's penetrating analysis of the nexus between materialism and politics offers a paradigm-shifting framework that transcends conventional political ideologies. The commodification of political processes, a cornerstone of Marx's perspective, delineates a departure from liberal theories by asserting that under capitalism, political actions become commodified tools serving the interests of the ruling class. This challenges prevailing notions of political autonomy, revealing elections and governance mechanisms as instruments perpetuating existing capitalist structures. Moreover, Marx's emphasis on class struggle as a primary force in political evolution distinguishes his perspective from conservative views, urging a scrutiny of political decisions through the lens of economic interests. The theory of alienation introduces a human dimension to political analysis, contending that capitalism estranges individuals not only from their labor but also from their essential humanity, influencing political engagement. Contrary to historical analyses emphasizing abstract notions Marx's historical materialism roots societal changes in shifts in the material conditions of production. This challenges liberal narratives highlighting that transitions such as from feudalism to capitalism are profound transformations of economic foundations that in turn shape political systems. Marx's perspective encourages a nuanced understanding of the intricate connections between materialism and politics, urging a reevaluation of the impact of economic determinants, class dynamics, human experience, and historical material conditions on the political landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Dr. Shahzad Munawar Ch & Dr. Muhammad Ahtasham Jan Butt & Saira Zaka, 2023. "The Influence of Materialism on Politics: An Examination Through the Lens of Karl Marx's Perspective," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(3), pages 352-355.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:352-355
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bbejournal.com/BBE/article/view/528/389
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://bbejournal.com/BBE/article/view/528
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lipset, Seymour Martin, 1959. "Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy1," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 69-105, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert MacCulloch & Silvia Pezzini, 2010. "The Roles of Freedom, Growth, and Religion in the Taste for Revolution," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 53(2), pages 329-358, May.
    2. Jian-Guang Shen, 2002. "Democracy and growth: An alternative empirical approach," Development and Comp Systems 0212002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Ahmet Faruk AYSAN & Mustapha Kamel NABLI & Marie‐Ange VÉGANZONÈS‐VAROUDAKIS, 2007. "Governance Institutions And Private Investment: An Application To The Middle East And North Africa," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 45(3), pages 339-377, September.
    4. Torsten Persson & Guido Tabellini, 2009. "Democratic Capital: The Nexus of Political and Economic Change," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 1(2), pages 88-126, July.
    5. Yong Glasure & Aie-Rie Lee & James Norris, 1999. "Level of economic development and political democracy revisited," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 5(4), pages 466-477, November.
    6. Emilia Justyna Powell & Steven Christian McDowell & Robert O’Brien & Julia Oksasoglu, 2021. "Islam-based legal language and state governance: democracy, strength of the judiciary and human rights," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 376-412, September.
    7. Pauline Grosjean & Claudia Senik, 2011. "Democracy, Market Liberalization, and Political Preferences," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(1), pages 365-381, February.
    8. Annette N. Brown & Drew B. Cameron & Benjamin D. K. Wood, 2014. "Quality evidence for policymaking: I'll believe it when I see the replication," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 215-235, September.
    9. Pettersson, Jan, 2003. "Democracy, Consolidation and Growth," Research Papers in Economics 2002:16, Stockholm University, Department of Economics, revised 15 Dec 2004.
    10. Ruiz Pozuelo, Julia & Slipowitz, Amy & Vuletin, Guillermo, 2016. "Democracy Does Not Cause Growth: The Importance of Endogeneity Arguments," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 7758, Inter-American Development Bank.
    11. Roberto Cellini & Tiziana Cuccia & Livio Ferrante & Domenico Lisi, 2024. "The Quality of Regional Institutional Context and Museum Service Provision: Evidence from Italy," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 10(1), pages 155-195, March.
    12. Leandro Prados de la Escosura, 2023. "Inequality Beyond GDP: A Long View," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 69(3), pages 533-554, September.
    13. Daron Acemoglu & Tuomas Pekkarinen & Kjell G Salvanes & Matti Sarvimäki, 2025. "The Making of Social Democracy: the Economic and Electoral Consequences of Norway’s 1936 Folk School Reform," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 23(1), pages 119-158.
    14. Tunahan Haciimamoglu & Oguzhan Sungur & Korkmaz Yildirim & Mustafa Yapar, 2025. "Rethinking the Climate Change–Inequality Nexus: The Role of Wealth Inequality, Economic Growth, and Renewable Energy in CO 2 Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Mark Gradstein & Branko Milanovic, 2004. "Does Libertè = Egalité? A Survey of the Empirical Links between Democracy and Inequality with Some Evidence on the Transition Economies," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 515-537, September.
    16. Shashi Kant Srivastava & Verma Deepika Chandra & Srinivas Jangirala & Janardan Krishna Yadav, 2024. "The Genesis of the Crypto-economy: Application of the Institutional Theory," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 49(3), pages 244-256, September.
    17. Anna Gdakowicz & Malgorzata Guzowska & Marta Hozer-Koćmiel & Leszek Gracz, 2023. "Gender Equality and Economic Growth in BSR and EAP Countries: A Quantitative Approach," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 354-378.
    18. Mohammad Reza Farzanegan & Sajjad Faraji Dizaji, 2014. "Political Institutions and Government Spending Behavior in Iran," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201403, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    19. Michal Madr, 2016. "Economic Development as a Factor of Democratisation: Evidence from Post-Socialist Economies," MENDELU Working Papers in Business and Economics 2016-70, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfh:bbejor:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:352-355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Muhammad Irfan Chani The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Dr. Muhammad Irfan Chani to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffhlpk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.