IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v15y2026i1p320-331.html

Collaborative learning in action: Building problem-solving communities in accounting education

Author

Listed:
  • Ajuma Walusa

    (Uninersity of Free State)

  • Makeresemese Rosy Q.M

    (University of KwaZulu-Natal)

Abstract

In the past, accounting education has frequently placed an emphasis on individual abilities and processes; nevertheless, the field of accounting in the real world requires collaboration and critical thinking. This study investigates the ways in which collaborative learning practices might transform accounting classes into communities that actively solve problems, so better preparing students for the issues they would face in their professional lives. The research investigates the use of small-group work, think-aloud protocols, and peer knowledge sharing in the context of financial accounting education. This is accomplished through the observation of classrooms and the analysis of teaching techniques. The findings indicate that when students take part in collaborative problem-solving activities, they have the opportunity to acquire a more profound comprehension of various topics, a more enhanced awareness of their own thought processes, and improved analytical abilities. This study demonstrates how collaborative learning environments are similar to professional accounting practices. These environments are characterised by teams working together to analyse complex financial data and make decisions based on that analysis. Among the important tactics that have been discovered include think-aloud protocols that clarify thinking processes, planned group activities that foster multiple points of view, and opportunities for peer teaching that reinforce learning through discussion. According to the findings of the research, collaborative learning not only improves the problem-solving abilities of individuals, but it also helps to cultivate vital professional qualities such as communication, teamwork, and critical evaluation of various approaches. These discoveries have significant repercussions for accounting educators who are interested in moving beyond the conventional teaching methods and adopting methods that are more interesting and productive for their students. According to the findings of the study, the establishment of collaborative learning communities in accounting education necessitates the meticulous organization of group activities, the competent facilitation of peer interactions, and the establishment of a classroom culture that places a high value on different thinking and the exchange of information. Accounting students benefit from this method because it helps them improve their technical and analytical skills while also preparing them for the collaborative nature of professional work. Key Words:Collaborative learning, accounting education, problem-solving, peer learning, metacognitive development

Suggested Citation

  • Ajuma Walusa & Makeresemese Rosy Q.M, 2026. "Collaborative learning in action: Building problem-solving communities in accounting education," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 15(1), pages 320-331, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:15:y:2026:i:1:p:320-331
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v15i1.4626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/4626
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v15i1.4626
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v15i1.4626?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Mufarrige & Todd J. Zywicki, 2021. "Simple rules for a complex regulatory world: the case of financial regulation," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 285-305, December.
    2. Majid Zamiri & Ali Esmaeili, 2024. "Methods and Technologies for Supporting Knowledge Sharing within Learning Communities: A Systematic Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-34, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Motshidise Swaratlhe & Tshepo Mabotja, 2026. "Dialogic teaching as a pedagogical strategy: enhancing communication competence in grade 9 technology classrooms," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 15(1), pages 390-401, January.
    2. Juliana Arifin & Nurul Syazwani Mohd Noor & Puspa Liza Ghazali & Roslida Abdul Razak & Hamizah Muhammad, 2024. "Educational Approach to Foster Knowledge and Understanding of Takaful among Malaysians," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 4462-4468, August.
    3. Yan Huang & Zhihui Zhang & Bingqian Xu & Xinyu Zhou & Jiayu Zhai & Da Gao, 2025. "Digital Learning Empowering Sustainable Education: Evidence from the Determinants of Chinese College Students’ Knowledge Innovation Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-20, October.
    4. repec:zib:zbjtin:v:4:y:2024:i:2:p:66-71 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Doste Khoshnaw & Georgiana Karadas, 2025. "Enhancing Knowledge Sharing Through Transactional Leadership in an Emerging Economy: The Strategic Role of Human Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Khalid Jamil & Wen Zhang & Aliya Anwar & Sohaib Mustafa, 2025. "Exploring the Influence of AI Adoption and Technological Readiness on Sustainable Performance in Pakistani Export Sector Manufacturing Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-28, April.
    7. repec:bjf:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:10:p:6-42 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Darwin Daniel Ordoñez Iturralde, 2025. "The influence of administrative thinking in knowledge management and innovation: a systematic review," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 26(02), pages 272-294, July.
    9. Faiz Mayah Alshammary & Dhakir Abbas Ali, 2024. "The Influence of Organizational Climate on Medical Employee Performance: Empirical Evidence from Hail Health Cluster," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 14(4), pages 1-10.
    10. Jabeen, Manahil & Jafar, Rana Muhammad Sohail & Li, Zhenghui, 2026. "Leveraging metaverse technologies for a sustainable future: The role of knowledge management practices and technology readiness," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    11. Han Cai & Lingfeng Zhu & Xiu Jin, 2024. "Validating the Causal Relationship between Quantum Leadership and Employee Innovation Performance from the Perspective of Organizational Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-25, September.
    12. Leyli Nouraei Yeganeh & Nicole Scarlett Fenty & Yu Chen & Amber Simpson & Mohsen Hatami, 2025. "The Future of Education: A Multi-Layered Metaverse Classroom Model for Immersive and Inclusive Learning," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-55, February.
    13. Guangyu Mu & Yuhan Wang & Nan Gao & Xiurong Li, 2023. "A Novel Tripartite Evolutionary Game Model for Internet Consumer Financial Regulation," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    14. repec:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:10:p:1208-1213 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. W.Boying & AS. Ismail & KN. Ali, 2024. "Bridging Safety and Innovation: Integrating Building Information Modelling (BIM) with Fire Safety Evacuation Compliance Checking Process," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(12), pages 3569-3579, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:15:y:2026:i:1:p:320-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.