IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v13y2024i4p388-402.html

Intergovernmental Relations and implementation of social housing policy in Gauteng Province, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Makota Gilbert Madisha

    (Department of Public Administration and Management, University of South Africa)

  • Prudence Khumalo

    (Department of Public Administration and Management, University of South Africa)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to assess intergovernmental relations in the implementation of social housing policy in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Despite all mechanisms, efforts and resources, the pace of social housing delivery is not at a point where it is measurably satisfactory across all spheres of government. The performance of government shows a lack of institutionalised arrangements, coordination, and alignment in implementing social housing policy. A mixed-methods research approach was implemented. Interviews were conducted with senior managers and research questionnaires were administered with operational staff within the national, provincial government and the three metropolitan municipalities in Gauteng Province which included City of Tshwane, City of Johannesburg and Ekurhuleni, state agencies involved in the delivery of social housing units and municipal social housing institutions, private and non-governmental social housing entities. The data were complemented by documentary content analysis pertaining to the provision of human settlements and social housing. The paper acknowledges the role played by government in implementing social housing policy, however, it proposes a model to fast track social housing delivery in Gauteng Province. Key Words:human settlements, social housing, intergovernmental relations

Suggested Citation

  • Makota Gilbert Madisha & Prudence Khumalo, 2024. "Intergovernmental Relations and implementation of social housing policy in Gauteng Province, South Africa," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 13(4), pages 388-402, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:388-402
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i4.3257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/3257/2346
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i4.3257
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i4.3257?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junki Kim, 2006. "Networks, Network Governance, and Networked Networks," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 19-34, July.
    2. Krzysztof Opolski & Piotr Modzelewski & Agata Kocia, 2019. "Interorganizational Trust and Effectiveness Perception in a Collaborative Service Delivery Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Omar Bentahar & Roslyn Cameron, 2015. "Design and Implementation of a Mixed Method Research Study in Project Management," Post-Print hal-01371708, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weihua Yan & Na Xu & Rui Xue & Zhenghang Ye & Zhaoyang Wang & Dingmeng Ren, 2022. "Efforts Proposed by IOC to Alleviate Pressure on Olympic Games Hosts and Evidence from Beijing 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Weerasinghe, Kasuni & Scahill, Shane L. & Pauleen, David J. & Taskin, Nazim, 2022. "Big data analytics for clinical decision-making: Understanding health sector perceptions of policy and practice," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    3. Sataporn Roengtam & Agustiyara Agustiyara & Achmad Nurmandi, 2023. "Making Network Governance Work in Forest Land-Use Policy in the Local Government," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    4. Muhammad Emdadul Haque, 2023. "Critical Success Factors (CSFs) in Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As)," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(10), pages 1-55, February.
    5. Richardson, Alan J., 2009. "Regulatory networks for accounting and auditing standards: A social network analysis of Canadian and international standard-setting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 571-588, July.
    6. Silvestre, Hugo Consciência & Marques, Rui Cunha & Dollery, Brian & Correia, Aldenisio Moraes, 2022. "Regional consortia and transaction costs for sanitation services in Brazil," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Nathalie Brender & Bledi Yzeiraj & Florian Dupuy, 2017. "Risk and accountability: Drivers for change in network governance. The case of school restaurants governance in a Swiss city," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1384636-138, January.
    8. Koroma, Jonathan & Rongting, Zhou & Muhideen, Sayibu & Akintunde, Tosin Yinka & Amosun, Tunde Simeon & Dauda, Sahr James & Sawaneh, Ibrahim Abdulai, 2022. "Assessing citizens' behavior towards blockchain cryptocurrency adoption in the Mano River Union States: Mediation, moderation role of trust and ethical issues," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Agata Kocia, 2024. "Communication as a Transmitter of Trust in Healthcare Network During Pandemic," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 18797-18812, December.
    10. Hamed Taherdoost, 2022. "What are Different Research Approaches? Comprehensive Review of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Research, Their Applications, Types, and Limitations," Post-Print hal-03741840, HAL.
    11. Nassim Ghondaghsaz & Zarina Chokparova & Sven Engesser & Leon Urbas, 2022. "Managing the Tension between Trust and Confidentiality in Mobile Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    12. Estrada, Samantha & Floren, Michael & Harding, Justin & Wroblewski, Matthew, 2021. "What is your research question? A mixed methods evaluation of an academic statistical consulting center," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:388-402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.