IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01371708.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Design and Implementation of a Mixed Method Research Study in Project Management

Author

Listed:
  • Omar Bentahar

    (CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine)

  • Roslyn Cameron

    (CBS - Curtin Business School - Curtin University)

Abstract

This article presents a mixed methodological approach in project management research and details the terms and the conditions of its design and implementation. Assuming, on the one hand, that qualitative methods allow the study of complex processes and phenomena in their idiosyncrasy, and, on the other hand that quantitative methods produce a nomothetic science based on statistical regularities (Miles, Huberman and Saldana 2013). We argue that mixed methods research allows, under certain conditions and trade-offs in the design and the implementation, the achievement of these two objectives. Mixed methods research remains underutilised in the management sciences despite the advantages in comparison to mono methods (Molina-Azorin and Cameron, 2010). This underutilization is linked to the tendency of certain discipline traditions and preferences for quantitative approaches as opposed to qualitative approaches. This opposition is also linked to the incompatibility thesis of the epistemological paradigms combined with the exclusive links between paradigms and methods. The theoretical foundations of mixed methods is relatively young and there remains many questions relative to the process of design, implementation and integration of qualitative and quantitative research to which researchers new to mixed methods may be confronted with. This article presents research which was carried out in two stages and focuses on the comprehension and the explanation of the diversity and the evolution of project manager's roles. The paper discusses and demonstrates the objectives of a research strategy based on a mixed methodological approach combining qualitative and quantitative methods and specifies the type of mixed method research according to the implementation order, the degree of combination of the two methods and the relative weight of the qualitative and quantitative methods. We propose a practical application of the theory of mixed methods that can assist and inspire project management researchers in the design and the implementation of their own mixed methods research.

Suggested Citation

  • Omar Bentahar & Roslyn Cameron, 2015. "Design and Implementation of a Mixed Method Research Study in Project Management," Post-Print hal-01371708, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01371708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Koroma, Jonathan & Rongting, Zhou & Muhideen, Sayibu & Akintunde, Tosin Yinka & Amosun, Tunde Simeon & Dauda, Sahr James & Sawaneh, Ibrahim Abdulai, 2022. "Assessing citizens' behavior towards blockchain cryptocurrency adoption in the Mano River Union States: Mediation, moderation role of trust and ethical issues," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Hamed Taherdoost, 2022. "What are Different Research Approaches? Comprehensive Review of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Research, Their Applications, Types, and Limitations," Post-Print hal-03741840, HAL.
    3. Muhammad Emdadul Haque, 2023. "Critical Success Factors (CSFs) in Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As)," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(10), pages 1-55, February.
    4. Estrada, Samantha & Floren, Michael & Harding, Justin & Wroblewski, Matthew, 2021. "What is your research question? A mixed methods evaluation of an academic statistical consulting center," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    5. Weerasinghe, Kasuni & Scahill, Shane L. & Pauleen, David J. & Taskin, Nazim, 2022. "Big data analytics for clinical decision-making: Understanding health sector perceptions of policy and practice," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01371708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.