IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v13y2024i4p350-361.html

Organizational redesign for government of Jakarta administrative city

Author

Listed:
  • Munjirin

    (Management, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jatinangor, Indonesia)

  • Wirman Syafri

    (Professor of Management, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jatinangor, Indonesia)

  • Mansyur Achmad

    (Professor of Management, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jatinangor, Indonesia)

  • Muhadam Labolo

    (Professor of Management, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jatinangor, Indonesia)

Abstract

The Jakarta City Government organization as a service instrument in order to meet the needs of the organization is currently considered no longer in accordance with the demands of the growing and increasing needs of the community. The overlapping main tasks of several organizational units and the long span of control became the reason for conducting research so that an efficient organizational format of the Jakarta City Government was found in serving the needs of Jakarta citizens The research method used was qualitative descriptive with 16 informants taken by purposive sampling. Data was taken by interviews, observations, focus group discussions and documentation which was then analyzed using NVIVO software. The novelty of this research is the majority of previous research examining organizational redesign in business enterprises, although some studies have also discussed the redesign of government organizations but not specific to the problems of the City of Jakarta. From the results of research that has been carried out with reference to five organizational points including strategic apex, operating core, middle line, technostructure, support staff, it was found that several changes need to be made starting at the strategic apex stage, it is necessary to restructure through the abolition of positions at the City Level such as the position of Vice Mayor. The operating core stage found that there are still overlapping authorities, uneven workloads, lack of facilities, lack of human resources and the need for service acceleration. The middel line stage found that the lack of sub-district role was proposed to be removed and needed to strengthen the authority of the sub-district. The stage of staff support was found that the official tribe had inappropriate duties and functions so that it was more effective and efficient when it was under the coordination and responsibility of the mayor. Key Words:Redesign, Redesign of Government Organization, Adaptation, innovation, Sustainable city

Suggested Citation

  • Munjirin & Wirman Syafri & Mansyur Achmad & Muhadam Labolo, 2024. "Organizational redesign for government of Jakarta administrative city," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 13(4), pages 350-361, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:350-361
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i4.3479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/3479/2343
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i4.3479
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i4.3479?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arundel, Anthony & Bloch, Carter & Ferguson, Barry, 2019. "Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 789-798.
    2. Nicolay Worren & Jeroen Bree & William Zybach, 2019. "Organization design challenges: results from a practitioner survey," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. John Alford & Carsten Greve, 2017. "Strategy in the Public and Private Sectors: Similarities, Differences and Changes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    2. Richter, Ralph, 2020. "Innovations at the edge: how local innovations are established in less favourable environments," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest Ar, pages 1-21.
    3. Sora Yoon, 2020. "A Study on the Transformation of Accounting Based on New Technologies: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    4. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2:p:175-195 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Nicolay Worren & Tore Christiansen & Kim Verner Soldal, 2020. "Using an algorithmic approach for grouping roles and sub-units," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Edson Kuzma & Simone Sehnem, 2023. "Proposition of a structural model for business value creation based on circular business models, innovation, and resource recovery in the pet industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 516-537, January.
    7. Niki Derlukiewicz & Anna Mempel-Sniezyk & Dominika Mankowska, 2021. "Development of Innovation Economy - Activity of Local Government in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2 - Part ), pages 175-195.
    8. Lars Fuglsang & Anne Vorre Hansen & Ines Mergel & Maria Taivalsaari Røhnebæk, 2021. "Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Kuziemski, Maciej & Misuraca, Gianluca, 2020. "AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    10. Michal Pohludka & Hana Stverkova & Beata Ślusarczyk, 2018. "Implementation and Unification of the ERP System in a Global Company as a Strategic Decision for Sustainable Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Halkos, George & Aslanidis, Panagiotis-Stavros, 2026. "Security, Freedom, and Justice in Greece: The Role of Governance Quality and Institutional Indicators," MPRA Paper 128991, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Owusu Victor Kwarteng & Gregar Ales & Ntsiful Alex, 2021. "Organizational diversity and competency-based performance: The mediating role of employee commitment and job satisfaction," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 16(4), pages 352-369, December.
    13. Aarthi Raghavan & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Araz Taeihagh, 2021. "Public Health Innovation through Cloud Adoption: A Comparative Analysis of Drivers and Barriers in Japan, South Korea, and Singapore," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-30, January.
    14. Joshua R. Bruce & John M. de Figueiredo, 2020. "Innovation in the U.S. Government," NBER Working Papers 27181, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Anca Antoaneta Vărzaru, 2022. "Assessing Digital Transformation of Cost Accounting Tools in Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Mette Sønderskov & Rolf Rønning, 2021. "Public Service Logic: An Appropriate Recipe for Improving Serviceness in the Public Sector?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, June.
    17. Shuanping Dai & Guanzhong Yang, 2020. "Does Social Inducement Lead to Higher Open Innovation Investment? An Experimental Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    18. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2020. "Towards a servitization of innovation networks: a mapping," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(9), pages 1368-1397, July.
    19. Tarabichi, Hani & Schildt, Henri & Kodeih, Farah, 2025. "Public sector innovation through nested experimental spaces: Reinventing the immigrant integration system," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(6).
    20. Jitendra Pratap Singh Chauhan & Sumeet Gupta, 2022. "Putting Sense and Mind into Your Enterprise Systems: A Qualitative Study of IS Assimilation in Large Public Organizations in India," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 11(1), pages 126-145, January.
    21. Matthijs Jansen, 2022. "Legitimation and Effects of Mission-Oriented Innovation Policies: A Spillover Perspective," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 243(4), pages 7-28, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:350-361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.