IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Les comptables nationaux s'accordent entre eux. Modification de la comptabilité nationale en France

  • Valérie Chauvin

[eng] France has changed its national accounts, and their basis year is now 1995 instead of 1980. National accounts are regularly changed for two reasons. Firstly, the concepts used to compute the data become gradually inadequate. Measures must then evolve. Since the previous System of national accounts of the United Nations, accountants have made a tremendous effort of synthesis. National accounts are easier to compare across countries and to compare with international statistics. Secondly, changing the accounts means a deeper analysis of the economy at a certain time. From 1978 to 1999, French growth has not been changed on average. However, the contributions to this growth have changed : a lesser dynamism of consumption is compensated for by more dynamic investments and stocks. In the institutional sectors, non financial business have experienced the greatest change : their saving rate has been eut down. JEL Code : M40 [fre] La France a modifié ses comptes nationaux, qui sont passés de la base 80 à la base 95. Les comptes nationaux sont remaniés régulièrement, pour deux raisons. En premier lieu, les concepts qui prévalent à l'élaboration des données perdent de leur pertinence avec le temps. Il faut donc faire évoluer les mesures. Depuis le précédent système de comptabilité nationale des Nations unies, les comptables ont réalisé un effort de synthèse pour améliorer la comparabilité des comptes nationaux entre différents pays, et avec les statistiques internationales. En second lieu, la révision des comptes est l'occasion d'étudier une économie plus à fond à une certaine date. Sur la longue période, le rythme de croissance moyen de la France n'a pas été affecté par ces nouvelles données. En revanche, cette croissance se répartit différemment, le moindre dynamisme de la consommation étant compensé par celui plus grand, des variations de stocks et de l'investissement. Pour les comptes d'agents, les ratios caractéristiques du compte des sociétés non financières ont été fortement modifiés; notamment, leur taux d'épargne a été réduit.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.3406/ofce.2000.1573
Download Restriction: no

File URL: http://www.persee.fr/doc/ofce_0751-6614_2000_num_72_1_1573
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Revue de l'OFCE.

Volume (Year): 72 (2000)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 157-183

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_2000_num_72_1_1573
Note: DOI:10.3406/ofce.2000.1573
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.persee.fr/collection/ofce

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Françoise Charpin, 1987. "Les défauts des comptes à prix constants," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 20(1), pages 189-207.
  2. Jean-Pierre Berthier, 1999. "Les nouvelles évaluations de biens et services dans les comptes nationaux," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 321(1), pages 7-29.
  3. Hélène Baudchon & Valérie Chauvin, 1999. "Les cigales épargnent-elles ? Une comparaison des taux d'épargne français et américain," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 68(1), pages 127-164.
  4. Virginie Madelin, 1999. "Les comptes des secteurs institutionnels : de la base 80 à la base 95," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 321(1), pages 31-55.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_2000_num_72_1_1573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.